Jump to content
SAU Community

Switzer P800 Nissan Gt-r Makes Over 700 Hp At The Wheels


Recommended Posts

Hey Guys... saw this on the main page!

had a quick look around, found this dyno video and um i it looks to me 700hp @ just the front wheels haha fools

http://www.dragtimes.com/2009-Nissan-GT-R-Videos-18061.html

and not only saying that... i am sure a 700hp GTR would be faster then

( 0-60 time of 3.35 seconds and a 1/4 Mile of 11.28 seconds at 132 MPH )

what you guys reckon?

+1 BS

It's true that an AWD supercar with 700 AWHP should be going far faster than 3.35 and 11.28. That's almost as slow as the original R35. Double the ponies should make the car a low 10 sec car at least.

Maybe their babying the clutch/transmission. I have my doubts about its longevity when far more mildly modified R35s are breaking them at the drag strip.

You sir have no idea. You know the front wheels wont turn without the back ones!

JK

Um how about No? Its called disconnect rear drive shaft = only fronts? I aint to sure on there setup...

but if you watched the dyno... they keep the cam of the back wheels and also when it comes on full throttle only the front

climb the dyno rollers 'rear didnt'

and yup thats what i thought also... thats pretty slow for nearly over 50% power increase from factory?!

OK? whats with all the wanks on here?

I'VE READ THE ARTICLE AND WATCHED THE VIDEO!!

I'm refering to the 700hp one, because all the article goes on about is the 700hp, compare that to the GTR 480/ish

still the times dont matched the HP power to get up and go power...

it aint even faster?

R35 GTR's have a gearbox safty function that will reduce the throttle imput at the throttle body regardless of the position of the pedal if it senses to much torqe load on the gearbox.

Is quite feasable that this is the culprit behind the average times.

just because a car makes a certain amount of power is not always going to equate specatacular acceleration times as getting the power to the ground is they key and with a lot of modern cars there is a lot of computer trickery going on.

The most powerfull car is not allways the fastest.

Um how about No? Its called disconnect rear drive shaft = only fronts?

I'm sorry mate but if you knew how an R35 works you'd know that's not possible. in an R35 power goes from the engine to the rear mounted transaxle, and there is a shaft sending drive back to the front. so you could disconnect that and run in RWD, but if you disconnected the rear tail shaft you'd have no wheel drive. and even trying to run in RWD i'm not sure if the ecu would allow it.

  • 2 weeks later...

ps. the 700hp they speak of is noted to be flywheel hp at the end of the video clip...

so thats not 700hp at the wheels...

and no you cant run a gtr as fwd only... the movement on the dyno is pretty typical due to the physics of whole thing...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Some of them keep working fine. 9 out of 10 of them end up causing an absolute misery bleeding the system and get thrown on the workshop floor in a tantrum and never thought about again because they were never really needed and just added crap to the car that we could have done without. Same-same with HICAS, A-LSD, and various other stupidities that over eager 10x engineers thought we had to have.
    • Not required but appreciated. Super Coppermix Twin even the non-competition model feels like the pedal is noticeably heavier than stock which was pretty well judged IMO. I'll be swapping in the Nismo operating cylinder soon to see how that feels.  Personally I haven't felt anything that justifies replacing the damping loop, at least compared to more modern stuff where the clutch delay valve is actually quite noticeable.
    • He made that comment in my thread - In my case the vents ARE to lower engine heat, when the car is not moving, which is the only scenario I have heat problems with the aircon on, sitting in traffic, on 40C+ days. I can't imagine a scenario that this NC needs any at this point in time. I do not know if it will actually make my cooling when the car is MOVING worse, and I sincerely hope that won't be the case. If it does, well, um, f**k.
    • Nice, thanks. Thats why I was asking, there'd been a fair bit of discussion in the E90 world about vents and where it makes sense to put one (ie, over the filters is not great as that is inline or slightly behind the struts and in higher pressure area). I struggle with air flow and pressures. It sill weirds me out that a radiator in the boot can work. 
    • Neither really Vents, when located in the right place, will lower the engine bay "pressure", as air has a path to escape, thus lowering the engine bay pressure, thus.....improving the efficiency on the coolant stack (read: IC, condenser, radiator) This is why the Blits vented bonnet on my 33 worked so well, the vent was in the front 1/3 of the bonnet, which put it right after the radiator  If the vents are to far back toward the windscreen, which is a high pressure zone, it can actually force air into the engine bay, causing higher pressure and effectively loosing efficiency on the cooling stack, like the fab of raising the rear of the bonnet, which does allow heat to escape, but only when the car isn't moving  There's heaps of cool "fluid dynamics" info out there, but, I'll attach a video of a 'Merican joint that focuses on "Miatas" as I found it when looking into vents for mine, they explain it way better than me  
×
×
  • Create New...