Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  femno said:
I cant see how you could possibly have better throttle repsonse with a single TB compared to six smaller ones basically bolted straight to the ports in the head?

As for lean on one cylinder, most a/m plenums have the same problem anyway with distribution.

Has anyone driven a SR20 Silvia then driven a GTI-R straight after? Tell me you cant notice the difference...not power wise but response.

And you cant really compare a built 26 with std TBs which probably runs lower CR too. My car is slightly 'doughy' compared to a factory 26.

Something to ponder......I wonder whether the extra response of the multi t/b setups might be from having a greater overall blade surface area compared to the single t/b setups.

My stock s15 had a smallish 50mm t/b then I bolted on the n/a t/b which was 60mm - it felt more responsive especially off boost. Then I did a built motor and Hypertune intake with theri 76 mm t/b setup and it also feels surprisingly responsive.

Is it the larger throttle blade area creating a larger opening for a given throttle movement be creating the phenomenum of response......which is why multi t/b plenums feel more responsive as they probably have a greater overall combined throttle blade area than a smallish single t/b.

  shanef said:
i bet both were 2.6's though, silly kents shoulda went 3.0, problem solvered

bit ot but i hate how 26's are down low, throttle responce mite be 'snappy' but theyve got n o t h i n g until about 4

im gona have to agree with you, firstly single tb is actually more responsive....

whoever posted about the suilvia and gtir, cannot compare as there are completly different sr20's, yes there is a difference, im pretty sure there are 131 differences between the gtir and silvia sr20

ive actually driven a gtr with firstly a standard setup, then a straight swap for a hypertune setup, untuned, the car responded exactly the same under 3500rpm, in the mid range and top end it was a shitload better than the 6 t/b's

  shanef said:
i bet both were 2.6's though, silly kents shoulda went 3.0, problem solvered

bit ot but i hate how 26's are down low, throttle responce mite be 'snappy' but theyve got n o t h i n g until about 4

They're both going RB30 now actually, funny how that works!

  Roy said:
RB30s are only for people who cant use a clutch and use the 5 gears Nissan gave them :blink:

All 5 gears are only needed by RB20 owners trying to keep up with RB30 owners :rolleyes:

  juggernaut1 said:
Something to ponder......I wonder whether the extra response of the multi t/b setups might be from having a greater overall blade surface area compared to the single t/b setups.

My stock s15 had a smallish 50mm t/b then I bolted on the n/a t/b which was 60mm - it felt more responsive especially off boost. Then I did a built motor and Hypertune intake with theri 76 mm t/b setup and it also feels surprisingly responsive.

Is it the larger throttle blade area creating a larger opening for a given throttle movement be creating the phenomenum of response......which is why multi t/b plenums feel more responsive as they probably have a greater overall combined throttle blade area than a smallish single t/b.

What you are after for crisp throttle response is good velocity and the ability to regulate it with the enough control that you can accurately fuel the engine and wind the ignition in. If you have a large throttle body then a small crack in the blade equates to a fair bit of air flow. Good for outright power, but for part throttel, crisp acceleration a small throttle body woudl be better. Thats why the smaller individual throttles woul dbe better for crisp acceleration as they being smaller diameter the gradient of airflow from the slightly open to fully open is more linear and therefore easier to control fuelling and tuning.

LOL, well thats at least what i learned / recall from designing an inlet system for a ZX6R engine. There is a reason why bikes run barrel/slide etc inlets and majority of race cars etc all run multi setups/

  shanef said:
oh but roy what about putting sedately around on the streets?

Hey, i drove a 800cc 3 cyl Handivan whilst building my old 427 Impala. Normal people seem to make do with 1.8L Corollas so there is no issue putting around the streets in a 1280kg RB20 powered GTSt. :blink:

I am curious to know more about the people that have gone single and picked up throttle response. Unless you are putting in a fill piece replacing the throttle bodies and install a throttle body onto the std plenum, then any change could be a result of aerodynamics in the plenum

  Roy said:
What you are after for crisp throttle response is good velocity and the ability to regulate it with the enough control that you can accurately fuel the engine and wind the ignition in. If you have a large throttle body then a small crack in the blade equates to a fair bit of air flow. Good for outright power, but for part throttel, crisp acceleration a small throttle body woudl be better. Thats why the smaller individual throttles woul dbe better for crisp acceleration as they being smaller diameter the gradient of airflow from the slightly open to fully open is more linear and therefore easier to control fuelling and tuning.

LOL, well thats at least what i learned / recall from designing an inlet system for a ZX6R engine. There is a reason why bikes run barrel/slide etc inlets and majority of race cars etc all run multi setups/

Actually the big single is a very crisp and bordering on twitchy at light load/low rpm throttle apps....and yes it did take a bit of time to tune for drivability in this area of the map. However, a larger pulley wheel could be made to slow the opening rate of the larger throttle butterfly down if it couldn't be tuned out.

  shanef said:
not street driven but throttle response and low end power delivery is almost everything. same as why most cars run low mount twins instead of big singles.

so ud rather have a poorly designed manifold and tune out the flaw? I'd rather have a proper manifold that flows evenly as possibly.

Proof please :stupid:

  shanef said:
i bet both were 2.6's though, silly kents shoulda went 3.0, problem solvered

bit ot but i hate how 26's are down low, throttle responce mite be 'snappy' but theyve got n o t h i n g until about 4

My turn... Armchair expert? :D

Mine is all in before 4000rpm. In fact it's hauling ass by 4000rpm... but then that's on a well developed set of bits and a tip top tune (that's only running 15psi, 20+psi would see it purely savage)

Yeah, I drag primarly, but I can go through the twisties with the best of them, and I don't know how awful much of that I ever spend below 4k rpm. My big arse slow spooling diesel bus turbo is full boogy by right at 4k and I think the way it hits when I put the hammer down is more than enough to compete with your 3.0L, but I'm not familiar with your setup, so I'd reserve judgement until I saw it. I love down low torque--I'm a V8 guy at heart and have a jeep with a stroker I6 in it in the states, but I don't know how aweful useful power below 4k is unless your talking about tight parking lot courses or crawling over rocks in the jeep.

  Roy said:
Hey, i drove a 800cc 3 cyl Handivan whilst building my old 427 Impala. Normal people seem to make do with 1.8L Corollas so there is no issue putting around the streets in a 1280kg RB20 powered GTSt. :D

I am curious to know more about the people that have gone single and picked up throttle response. Unless you are putting in a fill piece replacing the throttle bodies and install a throttle body onto the std plenum, then any change could be a result of aerodynamics in the plenum

i was taking the piss from ashlette sorry roy :)

  R31Nismoid said:
Proof please :)

My turn... Armchair expert? :)

Mine is all in before 4000rpm. In fact it's hauling ass by 4000rpm... but then that's on a well developed set of bits and a tip top tune (that's only running 15psi, 20+psi would see it purely savage)

proof of f**ken what? you urself said they run leaner at the back and to get around that u tune them out. put a proper plenum on it and itd flow near even and make more power, everywhere

u really should read ur posts, then ud see how flamen stupid you sound most/sometimes

whats 'all in'? 250kw and 130ft/lb? sounds right for a hipo rb20 :blink:

lol RB20... typical ignorant comment when you know full well I'm running a RB26/GT-SS

They run slightly leaner, is it a big deal? No. Makes next to zero difference for someone that has half an idea. Clearly most tuners must being its not an issue for ANYONE otherwise there would be dead motors all over the place from the "apparently so bad flowing factory RB26 intake"

I think you should stop with the smoke and mirror posts to try and detract from the fact your wrong by using race cars as examples of what is a good street setup. The two are nothing alike.

So go and get the proof that a single large T/B & plenum are going to be as good around town as a 6 T/B RB26 setup. You don't have anything to back it up at all which doesn't surprise me

i have to agree what works on the street wont work on the track and visa versa. you have a lot of variables on the street that you would not take into account on a race track its more point and shoot. has anyone actually measured the cross sectional area of the six individual butterflys compared to say a single 100mm item i'm thinking it would be larger in overall diameter

Unfortunately its not that simple, as only one cylinder breathes through each throttle(obviously), so its not all the time, only on intake stroke.

As for issues with uneven distribution with intake plenums, uras recently posted some interesting info, and there is plenty of evidence of it being an issue with rb26's, as almost every one that cracks a piston does it on #6, although this could be a combination of plenum distribution and uneven cooling system distribution.

or my setup im running multi throttles, with ram tubes and the biggest custom plenum i can fit in the bay to try and minimise the distribution problem by unshrouding the ram tubes and slowing the airflow velocity through the plenum over the ramtubes.

  • 4 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • But first....while I was there, I also swapped across the centre console box for the other style where the AV inputs don't intrude into the (very limited !) space.  Part# was 96926-4GA0A, 284H3-4GA0B, 284H3-4GA0A. (I've already swapped the top 12v socket for a USB bulkhead in this pic, it fit the hole without modification:) Basically to do the console you need to remove the DS and PS side console trim (they slide up and back, held in by clips only) Then remove the back half of the console top trim with the cupholders, pops up, all clips again but be careful at the front as it is pretty flimsy. Then slide the shifter boot down, remove the spring clip, loose it forever somewhere in the car the pull the shift knob off. Remove the tiny plastic piece on DS near "P" and use something thin and long (most screwdrivers won't fit) to push down the interlock and put the shifter down in D for space. There is one screw at the front, then the shifter surround and ashtray lift up. There are 3 or 4 plugs underneath and it is off. Next is the rear cover of the centre console; you need to open the console lid, pop off the trim covering the lid hinge and undo the 2rd screw from the driver's side (the rest all need to come out later so you can do them all now and remove the lid) Then the rear cover unclips (6 clips), start at the top with a trim tool pulling backwards. Once it is off there are 2 screws facing rearwards to remove (need a short phillips for these) and you are done with the rear of the console. There are 4 plugs at the A/V box to unclip Then there are 2 screws at the front of the console, and 2 clips (pull up and back) and the console will come out.
    • So, a bit of a side trip, but one that might be interesting for people with JDM cars and japanese head units. I know @Pac previously posted about a carplay/android auto adapter he installed which used the AUX input, and @V35_Paul put in one of the Tesla style units that replace both screens. The option I went with was a Lsait LLT-YF-VER5.87_2 (https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Lsailt-8GB-Android-Multimedia-Interface-for_1601187633672.html). Price was $1,150 for a single unit although they are much cheaper if you are willing to buy 2....$857ea. Make you you get the version 2 not version 1, it is faster and has a better UI - this is the manufacturer listing: http://www.lsailt.com/product/348.html. BTW if you've never bought from Alibaba before, don't be concerned....these guys can't stay in business unless they are responsive, ship fast etc, they were excellent (probably faster shipping than most local places) So, this was my task for a lazy Sat afternoon....looks complex but was all done in a few hours (it probably helps that I had some of it apart before so it was a bit familiar). I also decided to add a HD USB drive recorded at the same time and the unit also supports an aftermarket reverse cam (if you don't want to retain factory) and also AV in and HDMI out It looks much worse than it is, in fact in was genuinely all plug and play (no custom wiring at all). This video was pretty good (skipped a few steps), unfortunately they are an Aussie seller but no longer sell this unit (I guess Carplay/AA adapters are easier to install and much cheaper) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5hJfYOB8Dg
    • That still isn't a lot to go on. I don't have a Y50 Fuga Head Unit wiring diagram. I can say that a lot of nissans of that age shared head unit plugs, so if you are in Australia something like this would probably help: https://aerpro.com/app091# You plug that into the car loom, then either plug the head unit ISO into that (if it has ISO), or you buy and ISO adapter harness that you wire in. Bit of stuffing around, but once you have ISO its easy to change things in future.
    • It is a kunfine Android screen . Does anyone know the wirering diagram of the fuga ??
    • just an update to this, poor man pays twice  Tried sanding down the pulleys but it didnt do the trick. Chucked another second hand alternator in the na car which I got for free off my mate and its fixed the squelling. Must have been unlucky with the bearings.    As for my turbo car, I managed to pick up a cwc rb alternator conversion bracket + LS alternator for 250 off marketplace, looked to be in really good nick. Installed it , started the car and its not charging the battery.... ( Im not good with auto elec stuff so im not sure if this was all I needed to do but I verified such by using a multimeter on the battery when the engine was running and I was only getting 12.2v )   I had to modify the earth strap for the new LS alternator , factory earth strap was a 10mm bolt which did not fit the bolt on the LS alternator which was double the size so I cut it off , went to repco bought some ring terminals that fit, crimped it onto the old earth strap and bolted it up to the alternator , started the car and same issue. Ran like shit and was reading 12.2 at the battery.  For a "plug and play" advertised kit thats not very plug and play but alas.  My question is , am I missing something ? Ive been reading that some people recommend upgrading the stock 80 amp alternator fuse to a 140 amp but I dont see how that would stop the alternator charging especially at idle not under load.  Regardless ive pulled it out and am going to get it bench tested by an auto elec tomorrow but it would be handy to know if ive missed something silly or have done something wrong.   
×
×
  • Create New...