Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Great to see they have backed it up.

But given all the past controversy, why didnt they run the stock wheels?

Nissan has said they will offer the Rays wheels as an option in Europe, so perhaps globally also. Then it's just a stock car with optional wheels.

To compare, the 911's are available with ceramic brakes as an option which they would obviously use in any record setting attempt.

Nissan has said they will offer the Rays wheels as an option in Europe, so perhaps globally also. Then it's just a stock car with optional wheels.

To compare, the 911's are available with ceramic brakes as an option which they would obviously use in any record setting attempt.

Yep. All the 911's ever given to Sportauto are PCCB'd and Sportcup'd. Knowing how important Nurburgring lap times are, all the Euro manufacturers offer hot options on pretty much every car, though fewer than 5% of sales actually tick them.

The E92 M3 that Sportauto tested was also Sportcup'd and had race pads on the front callipers.

Running a well designed R-compound would return more than 5 seconds on the 'ring.

A great track setup for the GT-R would be a combination of the Nismo wheels and the New 20" R888s that Toyo are working on right now.

When CAR UK, tested the very first GT-R to arrive in Britain (a white GT-R grey import) Porsche supplied a Turbo with PCCB, and the GT-R went 1.1 seconds faster after just one lap. A set of Rays alloy wheels available on V-Spec is hardly a big deal...although haters will use this aganst GT-R.

In case you haven't watched it..the CAR UK video...

Part 1

Part 2

What's the go with the 7.26.7 lap time on the weekend? Why is this not mentioned by Nissan press or any other motoring website? Was this not an official Nissan attempt? This time basically puts it in line with the Corvette ZR-1..and this is before we talk about spec V...

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...