Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt-r Sets 'lap Record' At The Nurburgring


Max_ST-R
 Share

Recommended Posts

Great to see they have backed it up.

But given all the past controversy, why didnt they run the stock wheels?

Nissan has said they will offer the Rays wheels as an option in Europe, so perhaps globally also. Then it's just a stock car with optional wheels.

To compare, the 911's are available with ceramic brakes as an option which they would obviously use in any record setting attempt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nissan has said they will offer the Rays wheels as an option in Europe, so perhaps globally also. Then it's just a stock car with optional wheels.

To compare, the 911's are available with ceramic brakes as an option which they would obviously use in any record setting attempt.

Yep. All the 911's ever given to Sportauto are PCCB'd and Sportcup'd. Knowing how important Nurburgring lap times are, all the Euro manufacturers offer hot options on pretty much every car, though fewer than 5% of sales actually tick them.

The E92 M3 that Sportauto tested was also Sportcup'd and had race pads on the front callipers.

Running a well designed R-compound would return more than 5 seconds on the 'ring.

A great track setup for the GT-R would be a combination of the Nismo wheels and the New 20" R888s that Toyo are working on right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When CAR UK, tested the very first GT-R to arrive in Britain (a white GT-R grey import) Porsche supplied a Turbo with PCCB, and the GT-R went 1.1 seconds faster after just one lap. A set of Rays alloy wheels available on V-Spec is hardly a big deal...although haters will use this aganst GT-R.

In case you haven't watched it..the CAR UK video...

Part 1

Part 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the go with the 7.26.7 lap time on the weekend? Why is this not mentioned by Nissan press or any other motoring website? Was this not an official Nissan attempt? This time basically puts it in line with the Corvette ZR-1..and this is before we talk about spec V...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...