Jump to content
SAU Community

P Plater Laws And Power To Weight?

THR34T

By THR34T,
in Victoria

 Share

Recommended Posts

THR34T Mentor

THR34T

Posted
Posted

I've been hearing alot of rumours lately from people saying that they are scrapping the whole red and green P plater thing they have going on as the whole trial thing isnt working. i havent seen or heard of any facts about this but ive heard they plan to scrap it in july.

when i heard it i thought it was a load of crap.. has anyone heard anything similiar?

another thing was that they were changing it back to power to weight but that i cant believe..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/265972-p-plater-laws-and-power-to-weight/
Share on other sites
W0rp3D Grand Master

W0rp3D

Posted
Posted (edited)
There is no way they will scrap a scheme they have spend a small fortune on promoting/advertising/setting up... AND because it most certainly works better than the old one

I agree, even if it was proven to be the worst thing ever they would not scrap it because the government would then have to admit that they wasted tax payers money on some thing that didnt work.

Edited by W0rp3D
ss07 Community Regular

ss07

Posted
Posted

Can't say ive heard anything.

Not that it affects me that much being on green P's.

But somehow i doubt they would go back to the power to weight ratio - as ash said think of all that wasted money.

And if they went back to that, it gives the possibility for us to potentially drive some turbocharged cars etc, i wouldnt think they would give us that back.

And also they would be admitting that they were wrong haha, so fat chance.

Still, it would be good if its true...

But has anyone heard how they have been talking about trying to make the drinking age 21? Stupid..

Mohsen Grand Master

Mohsen

Posted
Posted

if they scrap the turbo o plater thing when they finally realise its pointless because ANY P PLATER CAN GO 100 IN A 60 ZONE in an na car.. same shit...

so yeah if that happens i will probably be doing somersaults down edgars and throwing shit at VL's.. ohh and start looking for a turbo car

THR34T Mentor

THR34T

Posted
  • Author
Posted

yeah, thanks. i still do think its all a load of crap as i did think that their current system is working a bit better than what it use to be. just heard from a ridicilous amount of people about it. just thought id see if anyone had heard anything similiar.

ta for replies

KARTAL Rookie

KARTAL

Posted
Posted

Ive heard a few things aswell..being a red p plater, personally would love for them to allow p platers to drive turbo's.

Found these and am waiting to see what happens...

http://www.carsales.com.au/news/2009/turbo...trictions-14479

http://carpoint.com.au/news/2009/volvo/gov...ot-by-all-14497

:) But I wouldnt hold my breath......

baron25 Proficient

baron25

Posted
Posted

Those changes would make sense, purely for the fact that like the article states, a growing number of makes (namely germans) are building low output, high efficiency turbos.

But i think it's something that they'd look long and hard at, as it's potentially giving the opportunity for new drivers to boost up the cars into dangerous levels. I know some will think 'how much could it possibly be', but if you could screw another 50-60kw (not unthinkable either, exhaust, filter, and some more boost would get you close) out of it, then you'd be approaching the magical 150kw mark, which is acknowledged as the limit for FWD's like VW's. Give that to someone who doesn't quite understand things like torque steer etc, and it'd be dangerous.

Really it's a reversal of the loophole that existed in NSW for awhile, which said "No turbo/supercharged vehicles" - which just made p-platers switch over to RX-8, 350Z and S2000's.

_bobo_ Mentor

_bobo_

Posted
Posted

i found this on another car forum..

P-platers can drive greener turbo cars

THE Victorian Government has lifted a ban on P-platers driving certain turbocharged and supercharged vehicles, citing environmental reasons.

In a statement released yesterday, Roads and Ports Minister Tim Pallas said the rule changes were designed to recognise "moderately powered, greener, lower-performance cars" that used turbocharging to improve fuel consumption.

But Mr Pallas made an embarrassing gaffe in announcing the new regulations, holding up a powerful and relatively thirsty turbo four-wheel-drive as an example of an environmentally friendly vehicle.

His statement said: "This is a commonsense approach, meaning young drivers won't be able to drive the sports-type, six-cylinder supercharged Holden Monaro, but would be able to apply for exemptions to drive the family fuel-efficient Mazda CX-7."

In fact, the CX-7 is more powerful than a Monaro and is one of the thirstier compact 4WDs on the market, using more fuel than a Holden Commodore wagon. A spokesman for the minister said he had made a mistake in the drafting of the statement and the new rules would single out only fuel-efficient turbocharged vehicles.

Turbocharged vehicles will now be banned or exempt based on their power-to-weight ratio, with drivers able to gain exemptions if their vehicle produces less than 125 kW of power per tonne. But the revised rules still leave loopholes for powerful six-cylinder vehicles, which still escape the P-plate ban. The Toyota Aurion and RAV4 V6 offroader both produce more power per tonne than the rules allow but are still deemed suitable for P-platers.

The spokesman confirmed those vehicles would remain unaffected by the new power-to-weight rules, which apply only to turbocharged vehicles.

Mangune Mentor

Mangune

Posted
Posted

Yer If they do change it to you can drive a turbo, its only 100kw per tone they are changing it to, not 125kw (rough guess) when i was on my p's like 5 months ago.

So that does eliminate the good turbo cars :down:, a 34gt-t is 130-40 kw per tone i think not 100%

KezR33 Veteran

KezR33

Posted
Posted
only thing that ive heard is that they might be planning on changing that rule of one passaeger for red p's, doesnt bother me since i got greens.

Worst. Law. Ever.

Seriously. So much for the designated driver. Unless he/she feels like doing 4 trips.

Supra- Enthusiast

Supra-

Posted
Posted

http://www.theage.com.au/environment/pplat...90313-8xy0.html

so preety much if youre driving a car thats 1500kg your aloud to have 187kw car?

would i be able to drive a stock r33 skyline gtst around now?

W0rp3D Grand Master

W0rp3D

Posted
Posted
http://www.theage.com.au/environment/pplat...90313-8xy0.html

so preety much if youre driving a car thats 1500kg your aloud to have 187kw car?

would i be able to drive a stock r33 skyline gtst around now?

Did you read the whole article?

"the new rules would single out only fuel-efficient turbocharged vehicles."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Murray_Calavera
      The Evolution Of "night Fury"

      By Murray_Calavera · Posted

      Price seems pretty good to me. Also seems a hell of a lot cheaper then buying another vehicle that only ever gets used for towing.  I'm a long way from you mate, I'm a couple of hours out of Brizzy. 
    • niZmO_Man
      Dumb rich kid tries modding for the first time

      By niZmO_Man · Posted

      New [400]Z, they're available in manual and you don't have to worry about parts scarcity. 
    • turbo76lx
      Torana Lx Gtr Hatch, Lots Of Pictures

      By turbo76lx · Posted

      Just planning to have the wiring neat and hide as much as possible.
    • MBS206
      R32 GTS (RB20DE) Injectors Replacement

      By MBS206 · Posted

      The sodium acetate, mixed with citric acid, doesn't actually buffer each other. Interestingly though, if you used Sodium Acetate, and acetic acid, THAT becomes a buffer solution. Additionally, a weak acid that can attack a metal, is still a weak acid that can attack a metal. If you don't neutralise it, and wash it off, it's going to be able to keep attacking. It works the same way when battery acid dries, get that stuff somewhere, and then it gets wet, and off it goes again breaking things down. There's a reason why people prefer a weak acid, and it's because they want TIME to be able to be on their side. IE, DIY guys are happy to leave some mild steel in vinegar for 24 hours to get mill scale off. However, if you want to do it chemically in industry, you grab the muriatic acid. If you want to do it quicker at home, go for the acetic acid if you don't want muriatic around. At the end of the day, look at the above thumbnail, as it proves what I said in the earlier post, you can clean that fuel tank up all you want with the solution, but the rust that has now been removed was once the metal of the fuel tank. So how thin in spots is your fuel tank getting? If the magazine on the left, is the actual same magazine as on the right, you'll notice it even introduces more holes... Well, rust removal in general actually does that. The fuel tank isn't very thick. So, I'll state again, look to replace the tank, replace the fuel hanger, and pump, work out how the rust and shit is making it past the fuel filter, and getting into the injectors. That is the real problem. If the fuel filter were doing its job, the injectors wouldn't be blocked.
    • GabsReDeal
      R32 GTS (RB20DE) Injectors Replacement

      By GabsReDeal · Posted

      Despite having minimal clothing because of the hot weather right now, I did have rubber gloves and safety glasses on just in-case for most of the time. Yes, I was scrubbing with my gloves on before, but brushing with a brush removes the remaining rust. To neutralize, I was thinking distilled water and baking soda, or do you think that would be overkill?
×
×
  • Create New...