Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've been hearing alot of rumours lately from people saying that they are scrapping the whole red and green P plater thing they have going on as the whole trial thing isnt working. i havent seen or heard of any facts about this but ive heard they plan to scrap it in july.

when i heard it i thought it was a load of crap.. has anyone heard anything similiar?

another thing was that they were changing it back to power to weight but that i cant believe..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/265972-p-plater-laws-and-power-to-weight/
Share on other sites

There is no way they will scrap a scheme they have spend a small fortune on promoting/advertising/setting up... AND because it most certainly works better than the old one

I agree, even if it was proven to be the worst thing ever they would not scrap it because the government would then have to admit that they wasted tax payers money on some thing that didnt work.

Edited by W0rp3D

Can't say ive heard anything.

Not that it affects me that much being on green P's.

But somehow i doubt they would go back to the power to weight ratio - as ash said think of all that wasted money.

And if they went back to that, it gives the possibility for us to potentially drive some turbocharged cars etc, i wouldnt think they would give us that back.

And also they would be admitting that they were wrong haha, so fat chance.

Still, it would be good if its true...

But has anyone heard how they have been talking about trying to make the drinking age 21? Stupid..

if they scrap the turbo o plater thing when they finally realise its pointless because ANY P PLATER CAN GO 100 IN A 60 ZONE in an na car.. same shit...

so yeah if that happens i will probably be doing somersaults down edgars and throwing shit at VL's.. ohh and start looking for a turbo car

yeah, thanks. i still do think its all a load of crap as i did think that their current system is working a bit better than what it use to be. just heard from a ridicilous amount of people about it. just thought id see if anyone had heard anything similiar.

ta for replies

Ive heard a few things aswell..being a red p plater, personally would love for them to allow p platers to drive turbo's.

Found these and am waiting to see what happens...

http://www.carsales.com.au/news/2009/turbo...trictions-14479

http://carpoint.com.au/news/2009/volvo/gov...ot-by-all-14497

:) But I wouldnt hold my breath......

Those changes would make sense, purely for the fact that like the article states, a growing number of makes (namely germans) are building low output, high efficiency turbos.

But i think it's something that they'd look long and hard at, as it's potentially giving the opportunity for new drivers to boost up the cars into dangerous levels. I know some will think 'how much could it possibly be', but if you could screw another 50-60kw (not unthinkable either, exhaust, filter, and some more boost would get you close) out of it, then you'd be approaching the magical 150kw mark, which is acknowledged as the limit for FWD's like VW's. Give that to someone who doesn't quite understand things like torque steer etc, and it'd be dangerous.

Really it's a reversal of the loophole that existed in NSW for awhile, which said "No turbo/supercharged vehicles" - which just made p-platers switch over to RX-8, 350Z and S2000's.

i found this on another car forum..

P-platers can drive greener turbo cars

THE Victorian Government has lifted a ban on P-platers driving certain turbocharged and supercharged vehicles, citing environmental reasons.

In a statement released yesterday, Roads and Ports Minister Tim Pallas said the rule changes were designed to recognise "moderately powered, greener, lower-performance cars" that used turbocharging to improve fuel consumption.

But Mr Pallas made an embarrassing gaffe in announcing the new regulations, holding up a powerful and relatively thirsty turbo four-wheel-drive as an example of an environmentally friendly vehicle.

His statement said: "This is a commonsense approach, meaning young drivers won't be able to drive the sports-type, six-cylinder supercharged Holden Monaro, but would be able to apply for exemptions to drive the family fuel-efficient Mazda CX-7."

In fact, the CX-7 is more powerful than a Monaro and is one of the thirstier compact 4WDs on the market, using more fuel than a Holden Commodore wagon. A spokesman for the minister said he had made a mistake in the drafting of the statement and the new rules would single out only fuel-efficient turbocharged vehicles.

Turbocharged vehicles will now be banned or exempt based on their power-to-weight ratio, with drivers able to gain exemptions if their vehicle produces less than 125 kW of power per tonne. But the revised rules still leave loopholes for powerful six-cylinder vehicles, which still escape the P-plate ban. The Toyota Aurion and RAV4 V6 offroader both produce more power per tonne than the rules allow but are still deemed suitable for P-platers.

The spokesman confirmed those vehicles would remain unaffected by the new power-to-weight rules, which apply only to turbocharged vehicles.

Yer If they do change it to you can drive a turbo, its only 100kw per tone they are changing it to, not 125kw (rough guess) when i was on my p's like 5 months ago.

So that does eliminate the good turbo cars :down:, a 34gt-t is 130-40 kw per tone i think not 100%

only thing that ive heard is that they might be planning on changing that rule of one passaeger for red p's, doesnt bother me since i got greens.

Worst. Law. Ever.

Seriously. So much for the designated driver. Unless he/she feels like doing 4 trips.

http://www.theage.com.au/environment/pplat...90313-8xy0.html

so preety much if youre driving a car thats 1500kg your aloud to have 187kw car?

would i be able to drive a stock r33 skyline gtst around now?

http://www.theage.com.au/environment/pplat...90313-8xy0.html

so preety much if youre driving a car thats 1500kg your aloud to have 187kw car?

would i be able to drive a stock r33 skyline gtst around now?

Did you read the whole article?

"the new rules would single out only fuel-efficient turbocharged vehicles."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...