Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think the ruling was that Skaifes door was ok at first, but then after the safety car, due to the extra congestion, vehicles in close proximity it became a safety concern.

Doesnt make sense really as after 30sec of racing under green the only car he would have overtaken would have been Murphys, which i dont think he would have caught even if he wasnt black flagged.

Makes me want to sell the Skyline and start saloon car racing, emulate Doughboy in a VN (Are you reading this?)

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest RedLineGTR

i rekon as soon as the door had the problem they should of made him go in....not wait like 4 laps before they decided while the safety car was out..because they thought it might hit some of the other cars etc etc...and other teams were bitching about it..

Bowe is a winger, Skaifes passing move was perfectly fine as was S. Richards. from what I saw JB saw he was being passed and tryed to suddenly close the door but far too late. He bitches and moans about other drivers causing inccidents but I think he should work on his own driving first.

All credit to Murph and kelly they did a fantastic job would have been a really good fight to the finsh with skaife if they hadnt pulled him in, which if they were going to do it should have been done right away instead of near the end.

Disappointing weekend from SBR, I'm a holden fan but I still like to see a good contest. Jimmy and steven's duel for 4th near the end was great! as was Larry Perkins' drive, he may not have the pace but there is no denying he knows how to make a car wide and fend people off how long was ingall behind him!

Congrats to Shuey on another F1 championship too all in all a great weekend of motorsport.

I dont like Ingall at all, so i loved seeing old LP holding him at bay.

What would make me really happy is Ingall putting the car into the wall over the next few rounds and SBR drop him.

Dont think its that much of a stretch as they dont tolerate poor results, only have to look at Baird, Longhurst, Besnard, Larkham, over past seasons, they have all been chopped at the drop of a hat.

Not likely to happen but as far as recent results go, Ingall makes silly mistake at Sandown, didnt show a lot of confidence in traffic in todays race, is known as a pretty poor qualifier, hasnt come to grips with the Ford as quickly as he expected....

Then they have Mark Winterbottom who with Noske was lapping well and handling the responsibilty/pressure running at the front, and SBR dont know what to do with him next season?

BTW, I totally disagree with the comment about the richards v bowe incident.

JB has *always* been an overly defensive driver, he had been holding up SR for 10 minutes with half an hour of the race to go

If it was the last few laps that would be one thing, but there was ages to go at that time. The rules are quite clear that you can't block, if you do you should be shown the blue flag, if you ignore it 3 times, black flag. The flaggies need to be encouraged to use the blue flag for more than just leaders lapping traffic.

Blocking is the scrounge of racing worldwide - most categories are close enough that it only takes a little blocking to ruin the whole race

/rant

The thing with skaife was that they were aware that there was a problem with the door and if it was going to be a problem with traffic they should have said something as soon as the saftey car was going out not a few laps later, i dont think its the last we will hear of the incident either.

Roy, you make some good points RE: SBR not tolerating substandard perfromances and the brilliance that Winterbottom displayed all year and at Bathurst. I reckon they may run a 3rd car in 2004 if they can get $$ and an extra spot from TEGA.

However, Russell hasnt exactly been disappointing this year (he's running 3rd in Championship) + the Stones have outlayed big $$ to have him. Just like Lowndes, Ingall will be staying put and will more than likely finish his career at Ford (and SBR).

Add W.Gardner to your list of rejected SBR drivers too... hehe.

Wasnt old Waynes fault though... hell the regulatoins have been changed because of his accident last year.

Winterbottom went well, but there were times where he looked a little ragged, but christ he did a sensational job. That ragged thing could be said about Lowndes in his first bathurst when he overtook Bowe on the outside at the end of mountain straight.

As for Ingall being 3rd in the chamionship, well he has been towed along by Ambrose for some of those points/results at Sandown and Bathurst. I think you will find with the exception of QLD Raceway where he was given the lead from Ambrose most of his results have struggled to keep pace with Ambroses with 4 or 5 finishes in 8th thru 13th.

But i suppose that can be said for many teamates.

I think you will find that it was Ford that paid all the money for Ingall, Not SBR.

So it is possible Ford could throw him in another Ford franchise like they did with Lowndes. Forbes Racing is a franchise that SBR/Ford could easily pick up for another of their drivers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
×
×
  • Create New...