Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

With hesitence I am putting up my 1992 HCR32 GTS-t Type M (which I have owned since July 2005. I am the 2nd owner of this car since buying it off a good friend. It was first imported and complied in late 2000 so has been in the country since then.

Has had a few mods done to it since its been here.

Here is a list of things on it so far mechanically.

Engine

- Standard RB20DET

- Splitfire Coilpacks

- Link GTS-Link ECU

- RB25 High-flowed turbo with steel internals.

- Stainless Turbo manifold

- Blitz Front Mount Intercooler

- Blitz Super Sound DD BOV

- Bosch 040 Fuel-Pump

Driveline

-Exedy Cushion Button Single plate clutch.

Suspension

-Yashio Factory Street Coil-overs (not sure what model but only has 6-level damper adjustment)

-JJR Solid Adjustable Castor rods.

Wheels

-Simmons FR17 (Fronts) 17x8 (Rear) 17x9

*front left wheel missing centre-cap.

Exterior

-Standard looking car with the Nissan Type-M 'Aero-Style' kit. No Wing

Interior

-Nardi Steering Wheel

-Apexi RSM + G-sensor

-Apexi EL Series boost-gauge.

The car has done 232,000km. I first purchased it when it had 174,000km in 2005. It has treated me well since then and has rarely given me any issues aside from the usual seizing coil-packs and blown turbo gaskets. Normally driven on the weekends or sometimes to work.

Engine was comp-tested recently and showing clean and even 130psi across all cylinders and no oil-leaks.

Always garaged and cleaned on a regular basis. Car is the original Metallic Black in colour and the body and paint-job is in overall good condition for its age yet has picked up dings and scratches over the years. It has had a number of small bumps which have been fixed and resprayed (ie parking lot scars).

Looking at $10,500 ONO without RWC but open to discussions on RWC. Registered until Nov' 2009.

Located in Melbourne, Western Suburbs, feel free to PM me or E-Mail me at seamew.tan@gmail.com.

p1010248n.jpg

p1030231n.jpg

Deciding on an upgrade so hope she goes to a good owner.

Will post up more pics soon.

Edited by Jenius
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Big single, and seqy. #sorted
    • The R32 suffers from an instrument binnacle that is uncomfortably close to the design of a VN Commodore's. But beyond that, the layout of the rest of everything, and the materials (ie the vinyl coverings on dash, armrest, etc) are acceptable, and the patterns on the fabrics are not as blergh as those in the R33. And R33 seats are....quite unattractive. I know it's only small details there, but I reckon the R33 got worse than the 32. But the big blergh is the overall shape of the dash on the R33. It's just has that whole Maxima/Pulsar sort of look to it. Nothing special at all. Generic Nissan sedan. Whereas, at least the R32 dash/binnacle was different. Less a wide expanse of boringly curved plastic. More a "cockpit" sort of look, even if nowhere near to the degree that the A90 Supras got. R34 seats look good on their own, until you realise that they are indistinguishable from the shape and fabric on 70 other Japanese cars. And the foam bolsters on them suffer even worse than the earlier cars. Other than that I don't really have an opinion the rest of the R34 interior. I took the bits of the R34 I wanted (brakes and engine) and added them to the best external appearance Skyline in the modern era (the 32). So nyerr!
    • Can I be your first customer? I would like hard lines done for the fuel system, 8AN up and 8AN back and the underside wire wheeled and coated (brush or sprayed) with that black tar shit.
    • Speak for yourself, I love the R33 interior. 32 is blergh. I like the 34 interior too. Then you start getting much newer in most cars and they all turn back to blergh. 馃槢
    • 500-600hp into a RB is already 'sinking endless amounts of money' into an engine. Especially a 30 year old engine. Unfortunately this is the RB Game. Considering stock power (or at least stock components) will do ~360whp on 98 by simply turning up the boost on the stock gear on a RB26, that would be where I'd say the cutoff point for "sinking endless amounts of money into the engine" Cause to even do this reliably you'd probably need to replace all the bits anyway cause they're old, starting your sinking journey anyway. I reckon the least painful way is rebuilding the engine to make 50hp over stock lol. The 'plan your ownership around a rebuild' was a common saying 15 years ago.
  • Create New...