Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Trying to figure out what controls the speed sensitive steering in my R32 for a couple of reasons..

First being that I would like to turn it off for track days (could just pull the plug from the HICAS computer I guess).

Secondly, I would like my Stagea to have the same sort of speed sensitive steering.. definitely needs to be heavier at high speed.

Is it purely electronically controlled? or is there special valving or something involved?

/discuss

Pretty sure its the HICAS computer, check the tutorial on removing hicas, it mentions not disconnecting the ECU for a reason on an R33, I *think* its the same for an R32 but best to check...

On r32 for speed sentivity - valve .. controlled by ECU, based on speedo.

Disconnecting the plug is not going to do much, other than let the toe in of the rear wheels vibrate around which will not give you any benefit. To do it properly you need to lock the rack.

Rear swaybar and locked rack makes a good difference - very predictable.

Where is that valve located? pump or rack? would there be a way to set this up in the Stagea?

Already got a lockbar along with swaybars and coilovers etc in the 32, HICAS computer is still plugged in. Would pulling the plug on the HICAS computer immediately turn the steering hard? I guess if it's controlled by the HICAS computer and that is removed then it should instantly become heavy..

what do u mean take it out for track, u mean the HICAS or the speed sensitive front steering?

there is a speed sensitive control, pretty sure it works off the speedo cable, im pretty sure there are 2 stages, full power steering, and just power assist. personally i think any proper circuit work feels like shit with only power assist, having only power assist for highway driving is good as not much turning is needed, so the wheel is firm and doesnt want to move a lot, but when ur trying to move it a lot like at the track it feels like shit.

a manual rack is one thing, a powered rack without powersteering is another, atm i have an issue where i can only get power assist at all speeds (due to not having a speedo) and especially for drift it feels like shit, yes its harder to turn, but not in a good way, the rack is very sluggish unlike a manual rack, it provides fark all feedback and just doesnt feel very responsive at all.

this probably has nothing to do with what ur talking about, but yeh.

I'm talking about the speed sensitive steering for the front..

My understanding was that it is progressive from ~60km/h - ~100km/h.

Anyway, the MAIN reason for this topic, is to try to understand what controls the speed sensitive steering and whether it could be adapted to another car..

Basically, on a 32 anyways, you have the mechanical speedo drive to the dash cluster. Then from the cluster you get a pulsed output relative to speed (frequency changes not duty cycle) that is transmitted to the hicas / ps module in the boot. This then works out what is meant to happen and outputs a signal to the solenoid on the power steering rack (front of car) that changes the hydraulic assist effort. This signal is fixed frequency but varying duty cycle.

I understand with 33 and 34's it is the same, just no hicas hydraulics, but power steer assis is still hydraulic solenoid, same same.

To transfer the lot into another vehicle you would need some sort of module to replicate this completely and having a speed input available, using a hicas ecu wouldn't work cos it will fault with not seeing the the correct responses from the hicas, wheel sensors, steering wheel angle sensor. As well as using a rack with the solenoid on it.

I have thought about making a unit up to remove the hicas ecu and just do the steering assist but haven't been arsed yet. Got my hicas / power steering all working before I made it that far.

If any of that made sense, well..

:/

James.

*edit ps, definately progressive, I have a graph here from the gtr workshop manual, and a couple of cro photos from when I was discussing this with SK a long time ago..

Edited by heller44
my stag felt a little better once i added adjustable camber/castor bushes and wound in max castor

My stag handles really well, it's just the steering at high speed is too light for my liking..

Heller, cheers :) I was thinking something like a variable resistor on the wire going to the rack solenoid but now that you say it's varying frequencies that controls would probably need something like a pulse width modulator? (I'm not an electronics guy :))

Does the stag have variable assist at all?

One thing you could do for track use with the 32 is shove a switch in line with the rack solenoid, open the circuit. My car was like this for over a year cos the git that wired everything up forgot to wire the rack in, along with the clutch switch, reverse light, speed signal, etc etc... :) was quite driveable, even carpark speeds weren't a problem, if you climb under the car, and look from the back of the rack forward, you will see the solenoid where the steering column mates up. Just unplug it there and test..

The unit I was thinking of making would just take a speed input and generate the solenoid drive.. Letting you lock out the hicas without a fault and being able to adjust the gain of the steering to how you wanted it.. Reasonably simple circuitry just haven't found time effort motivation..

Interesting topic, does the solenoid operate a variable volume valve to regulate the amount of oil flow? In other words, what mechanical device regulates the amount of power steering? And in what way does the solenoid operate that mechanical device?

Does the stag have variable assist at all?

One thing you could do for track use with the 32 is shove a switch in line with the rack solenoid, open the circuit. My car was like this for over a year cos the git that wired everything up forgot to wire the rack in, along with the clutch switch, reverse light, speed signal, etc etc... :P was quite driveable, even carpark speeds weren't a problem, if you climb under the car, and look from the back of the rack forward, you will see the solenoid where the steering column mates up. Just unplug it there and test..

The unit I was thinking of making would just take a speed input and generate the solenoid drive.. Letting you lock out the hicas without a fault and being able to adjust the gain of the steering to how you wanted it.. Reasonably simple circuitry just haven't found time effort motivation..

Is the solenoid you are referring to the big HICAS solenoid thing under the intake manifold? if so, I removed that when I removed all of the associated HICAS gadgetry. All that is left is the HICAS computer in the boot..

I like your thinking with the circuitry, I'm not sure if the Stagea has variable assist but even if it didn't, could a signal be intercepted or modified at all?

The solenoid is built into the steering rack itself, where the steering column meets the horizontal part of the rack the solenoid is like a large wart on the intersection, two wires coming out of it to a two pin inline connector to a harness that dissapears up into the nethers of the car.. You might be able to see easier than me, the 26 and its attendant bits fills the engine bay that well my monkey mitts can't follow..

If there is no solenoid on the stag, you would have to insert something like a bypass valve in the hydraulic loop to reduce the assist. Not something I would be playing with. Have a look and see, I would be suprised if it doesn't have it since it is basically a 'line anyway.

One way to alter the solenoid drive signal is to use something like the jaycar kit, digital pulse adjuster.. takes a duty cycle input and modifies it for the output.. Seem to remember an autospeed artical using this kit for adjusting the steering response on a lexus or something a while back.

James.

Excellent work James, I will report back when I have investigated a little further!

Engine is coming out of the 32 soon so will look at the rack and splice in a switch. Will also attempt to look at the rack in the Stag.. not sure if I'll be able to see anything past the diff/driveshaft/etc.

Put the car up on ramps, slide in under the drivers side floorpan and look forward at the rack. It is very obvious what you are looking at when you get there.

Try unplugging the solenoid before you go to the trouble of a switch.. You might not like it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
×
×
  • Create New...