Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So some of you guys know I (and some others) love to get into big debates over american hp vs. aussie hp. I do think they can be different (but I will not accept one figure is "better" or more "accurate" than the other.) Many figures that are posted on here from around the world are shot down because they don't match the hp to mph figures you guys have. I have combed the dyno results threads and see no mph stats for a most of the posts. I was wondering if some of the experts could give some hp to mph ballpark figures for different body styles (or weights really). Examples........

R32 GTSt's are around 3000lb?

100mph-110mph = XXXrwhp'ish

110mph-120mph = XXXrwhp'ish

120mph-130mph = XXXrwhp'ish

R33 GTSt's are around 3300lb?

100mph-110mph = XXXrwhp'ish

110mph-120mph = XXXrwhp'ish

120mph-130mph = XXXrwhp'ish

R32 GTR's are around 3300lb?

100mph-110mph = XXXrwhp'ish

110mph-120mph = XXXrwhp'ish

120mph-130mph = XXXrwhp'ish

Also, how would AWD effect that equation? I think a R32 GTR weighs about the same as a R33 GTSt, correct? Would the same mph to hp figure be true? Obviously the E.T.'s are going to vary a lot with all cars depending on suspension, tires, driver, track, etc. For example, my best mph (with a Gtec) has been 127mph in a R32 GTSt. What kind of hp would you guess I'm making (o jeez, I just asked that question. Sorry :banana: )

Again, I'm just looking for broad ballpark estimates, not figures I could hold anybody too.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Subscription post.

There is one thing I would like to point out that you have said about suspension, tyres and various other setups that will make the car perform differently, and we don't need an American to have an arguement...we have enough between ourselves lol,

and that is take one engine...Engine = 1000hp, put engine into car A. Car A has a 'no-expense-spared' and no stone unturned approach for the build up. Car A does 8.00 at 180mph. Pull engine out and Put in Car B with less spent and not as many improvements for a completely dedicated drag car, it is driven on the street. Car B does 10.00 at 165mph.

We have a couple of examples of this in Australia where engines are borrowed (and those figures above do not represent any particular one) and the times, and MPH will differ dramatically.

I still maintain that MPH is not an accurate indication of HP but moreso an accurate indication of a cars potential to do a better time and the fact that it's 'setup' may not be perfect.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4553176
Share on other sites

If you are conserned with mph vs hp. go the extra step and put weight into it too.

Google 1/4 mile calculators from weight, et, and hp and it should give you a close enough answer.

letstorquebhp.com is a good site. You can select from 4wd, rwd to fwd too :)

Hope this helps

Edited by R33GOD
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4553258
Share on other sites

I still maintain that MPH is not an accurate indication of HP but moreso an accurate indication of a cars potential to do a better time and the fact that it's 'setup' may not be perfect.

I would completly agree with that. Example, my times/mph are on drift type Cusco suspension, a factory viscous, 275/40R17 drag radials, and NOT on a prepped track (or any "track" for that matter :) ). I think with a better drag set up (and maybe a driver mod), I would not only have much better E.T.'s, but also a higher mph. I spin completly through 1st and 2nd gears. Glad you like the idea of the thread too :D I was worried it would be recieved as a "how much hp do I have?" post.

Also, R33god if you'll notice I did specify in the post weight (via chassis type) was a must for info.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4553277
Share on other sites

If you are conserned with mph vs hp. go the extra step and put weight into it too.

Google 1/4 mile calculators from weight, et, and hp and it should give you a close enough answer.

letstorquebhp.com is a good site. You can select from 4wd, rwd to fwd too :)

Hope this helps

Im suspect about those to be honest as sometimes they say my car should have made 250rwkw to run 110mph, but i know thats not right :D

For the record i've run the following:

1480kg (3280lb) - i weight in @ 80kg's

220rwkw (296rwhp)

110mph

From what ive understand, thats pretty much spot on the money :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4553357
Share on other sites

There is alot of variables that go with each persons car, so i think it would be a good idea to state not only what power and weight of car, but also what tyres and sizes along with ratio of diffs ect. Idealy to build up a diary of info it would be best to use one car,one dyno and one track and driver also performing mods as you go i would think, but im sure you could get some rough power figures v mph

Edited by SilverCal
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4553908
Share on other sites

I know you can usually tell from avatars or screen names, but just to get people in the habit, make sure you post body type and/or weight if known. I don't think we need wheel size and gears and stuff. To much clutter for ballpark figures.

Keep it coming guys, good stuff. Maybe what type of dyno used also?

Edited by Cjmartz2k
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4553914
Share on other sites

While various things play a part, you can still get a very good idea of where a setup 'should' be roughly with either ET or MPH if you know what car/weight and so on.

Street rubber tends to let the MPH increase a tad, where stickier seems to lower it a bit because you get to the end sooner (due to a nice low 60ft)

Recent case with R33 GTR kid, his MPH was very low for the power he had, turns out he didn't actually have that power due to a leak somewhere and less boost/power that he didnt know about.

So there is very much good merit too it

Yeah and I did a 13.6 @ 109.6 mph with 260rwkw in a 32 GTST.

260rwkw in such a light car would be good for a 115+mph, and deep into the 12s if you keep at it!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4554001
Share on other sites

yeah mph doesnt seem to get effect greatly by tyres/ratios/60ft time. hp vs weight, you should get pretty damn close to the mph regardless of setup, unless your talking about something rediculous that you have to pedal the whole way down the 1/4

edit - refer to morosso calculator for what your car 'should' run

Edited by VB-
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4554026
Share on other sites

Also take into effect power curve...

Really, it's the area under the torque curve that gets you down the strip quickest... :)

500RWHP Dyno queens are CONSTANTLY shown up on the strip by 300RWHP STREET cars... Purely, as the 500RWHP car has the worlds shittest power delivery...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4554212
Share on other sites

Also take into effect power curve...

Really, it's the area under the torque curve that gets you down the strip quickest... :)

500RWHP Dyno queens are CONSTANTLY shown up on the strip by 300RWHP STREET cars... Purely, as the 500RWHP car has the worlds shittest power delivery...

A laggy motor will show zero lag if launched hard enough at drags and 99% of them wont drop boost between gears either (unless its something that doesnt come on till 6000rpm etc). Maybe a 5th gear roll on yer but from standing start no chance.

I run a t04z and car is hopeless below 4k rpm but at the drags it launches like a rocket and not one hint of lag and the time refects that. Maybe running a gt47 or twin gt3540s or something, but not a 500hp car which is gt35 or t04z territory.

mine weighs 1750kg and does 124.6mph, dyno shows 560rwhp.

Edited by unique1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4554407
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...