Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ecu need learning throttle close position and (TAS) throttle adjust screw if ecu connector or throttle position connector is removed, after adjusting timing , adjusting idle, when battery becomes flat or after changing batteries ,Z33 34 M35 etc

I think some people need this one.

So this is something different to the idle learn procedure? If so, I'd say EVERYONE needs it.

Would you care to elaborate on the procedure for this, please Toshi?

Edited by Daleo

I cant seem to find the Teps website, has it disappeared?

lol, the link in my sig hasn't changed... still works no problem

On top of that I think you might find the VQ35 does not have a throttle restriction.

They still use the VQ25det engine, but stroke it out using (at a minimum) VQ35de crank and rods.

Doesn't make it 3.5L though.

EDIT: just calculated it, 3.25L if you put VQ35 crank and rods in a vq25det (maintaining the same bore)

Edited by iamhe77

I've seen a 3.6L TEPS built VQ25DET on a link on here. The Flash web site that stole heavily from Fast and the Furious...

If VQ35 crank and rods make it 3.25L, what else do they do to them?

I've seen a 3.6L TEPS built VQ25DET on a link on here. The Flash web site that stole heavily from Fast and the Furious...

If VQ35 crank and rods make it 3.25L, what else do they do to them?

Nope, sorry... not 3.2L... 3.5 crank and rods make it 2.8L (2771.42cc)

Here is the TPS.

It means you can adjust the idle to some extent and also get more air at startup? And perhaps slightly more throttle position at stall or when driving which will explain the slight differences we are seeing on the Informeter.

post-63525-0-44798200-1305173478_thumb.jpg

Here is the TPS.

It means you can adjust the idle to some extent and also get more air at startup? And perhaps slightly more throttle position at stall or when driving which will explain the slight differences we are seeing on the Informeter.

The difference could be that the Impul was able to adjust it slightly.

I will put the stock ECU back on and test in the next few days.

Cheers

Andy

They still use the VQ25det engine, but stroke it out using (at a minimum) VQ35de crank and rods.

Still doesn't explain how they get it to 3.6L :nyaanyaa:

As Scott said, to reach 3.6L they bore and stroke the VQ25det, then use a VQ35de crank and put in their own rods and pistons as per below

(ain't they puurdy :))

TEPS36LVQ25detpistonsandrods.jpg

I spoke to Jetwreck and he said his nismo ecu not problem under 3000rpm.

G-ZONE said throttle controller and remap throttle map is same performance.

Scotty have throttle controller but its not good work.(This means Scotty changed throttle map but he could not fix under 3000rpm problem)

How is Ks rom?

Ks rom do not change throttle map.

If Ks rom fixed under 3000rpm problem its mainly std map problem.

If Ks rom can not fix under 3000rpm maybe throttle map problem.

How is Ks rom?

Ks rom do not change throttle map.

If Ks rom fixed under 3000rpm problem its mainly std map problem.

If Ks rom can not fix under 3000rpm maybe throttle map problem.

All correspondence I had with Ks stated that they cannot remove the <3000rpm restriction.

The cam advance map on the Vmanage seems fine, as in it is advanced at stall. The problem is the throttle plate no opening and it doesn't matter what you do to get around it as airflow is the ultimate problem. It looks like there is only two ways around it, to run the stock turbo or to go the cable throttle route.

Craig still cant launch his car unless he spools the turbo up which takes a few seconds. The Nismo still limits the throttle at launch unfortunately.

If its just throttle problem how is install big throttle?

Air flow more than std throttle.

I think wire can not install with std ecu.

If you take out electric throttle how to adjust idle and idle up?

Think outside the box Toshi, the idle can be adjusted with the adjustment screw on the side of the cable throttle, im using an EA Ford one I think.

The stock ecu will go into limp mode which is 1200 revs, then the Emanage will take full standalone control = WIN. :thumbsup:

Enlarging the throttle will work to some extent but im just sick of the whole thing, I want full control of the air and attached to my foot. What's wrong with a throttle cable anyway?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Uncle Duncan Yeap, FI Interchiller  Works well, normal IAT's cruising with the WTA only went from 50°c+ to 25-30°c with the interchiller  Before, when on it hard, the IAT would see 80-90°c, now, the highest has been was around 38°c IIRC IAT is measured under the blower hat I recommend it for the street or strip where your only on it hard for 10 or so seconds, but it wouldn't be efficient for sustained track use as it would heat soak from the AC turning off or whatever it does during WOT to protect the compressor It really needs the AC running for it to not heat soak and keep the WTA coolant chilled My WTA coolant temps when just cruising is around 2°c
    • Hey Mark...sorry to interrupt your career change to hair dressing... but...did you ever fit the interchiller to the commodore, and if so how was it? And, who made it?
    • I've been pondering this, I really enjoy the convertible thing, for me, it's like riding a motorbike, without all the issue of riding a motorbike, mainly, my old sore arthritic joints getting beaten up, and, being able to do it in shorts and a T-shirt and not needing a helmet and all the other gear required, especially like wearing jackets and pants in the summer, or needing 6 layers of cloths in the winter, or not having wet weather gear handy when your 100km away from home on the bike when it decides to start raining As for the hard top and its Coupe look, whilst I do lose all that open top feeling that I really enjoy, from my experience with the NB with a detachable hard top, the cabin is a much nicer place to be, the difference in noise for one, a hard top quietens down the interior, alot, with the soft top up or down it's pretty noisy, which, after 5 or so hours, can get tiring But, as you stated, the detachable hard top totally changes the look of the car, in a really good way, and for me, the look of a detachable hard top is so much better than the PRHT which looks more like a after thought with its weird bulbous rear roof line For me, the minimal effort of putting in on, or storing it after removing it, is well worth the time and effort for the look alone And yes, I'm sure the next owner will be grateful for it as well.......  
    • I get into huffs with people when I suggest the MX5 looks so much better as a coupe than it does as convertible. Pretty sure I don't prefer the convertible version of anything. Good job on the hardtop! The next buyer will appreciate.
    • IMO wrap does have its uses, but like you said, quality wrap, and professional installation, would probably cost want a quality paint job does, but, the paint, if maintained, is basically for life, and much easier to touch up if required  In other news: it's pissing down here, with thunder, lightning and only some small hail "at this stage", luckily all "my" cars are undercover  I've also been contacted by a guy in Newcastle about the SS, he said he will come down next weekend for a look, we'll see how that transpires I guess 🫰
×
×
  • Create New...