Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

Just want to compare what results other people acheived from BMT Dyno.

Please also state the mods you have.

Anyway I go first.. Just had my car dynoed at BMT , im sure Sam will remember me ;)

Car:

------

-Skyline R33 GTST Type-M

Mods:

-------

-2 Stage Boost Controller (set to 11 psi, no spikes)

-3" Dump/Front pipe

-3" Cat

-3" Exhaust

-Apexi SAFC tuned from Sam himself

-NGK Plenium Spark Plugs gapped to 0.8mm

Result:

---------

-127rwkw

Is that abit too low? I know that the BMT dyno is more accurate than all the other Dynos out there and that other dynos run higher. Just wanna see what other people had acheived from BMT :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26690-bmt-dyno-results/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

ive heard it is more conservative.. i read somewhere a car was put on the bmt dyno and it got well i forget :P but then the same car was put on the dyno at auto salon and it was much higher. Does the word conservative mean more accurate?

i was rather shocked at 127rwkw i must say. the car should me more then that stock

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26690-bmt-dyno-results/#findComment-563745
Share on other sites

It is always hard to say more accuracy but I think all dynos are conservative compared to Autosalon. I dont know about BMT's as I use Ben at RacePace and Simon's at Nizpro that are different but come up with very similar figures that are usually consevative by other dyno's standard.

Mick.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26690-bmt-dyno-results/#findComment-563794
Share on other sites

yes dude, everything seems ok. turbo spinning, only got stock intercooler though :P i was shocked myself also.. its really weird, timed myself 0-100km using the apexi RSM and scored 5.8sec? my car isn't that sloww as i can feel the pull in it but why 127rwkw that puzzles me.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26690-bmt-dyno-results/#findComment-563807
Share on other sites

Hey Eric 127rwkw is a bit low considering ur car is an auto with auto u loose 10-15rwkw easy I got 140rwkw when mine was auto with 11psi boost 3" cat back zorst and tuned safc on BGT's dyno about 2yrs ago it could be the dyno itself. ur 0-100 time is pretty respectable so u might actually have more than what the dyno shows that would be my theory anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26690-bmt-dyno-results/#findComment-563971
Share on other sites

guys just to let u know most older dynos are not very accurate and generally put out a lot higher readings... all the new dynos that are around are genuine readings which u should really go by... it may only be low 120s but i bet it will beat or stay up with cars that have dynoed 180rwkw on other dynos.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26690-bmt-dyno-results/#findComment-564030
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...