Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

Just want to compare what results other people acheived from BMT Dyno.

Please also state the mods you have.

Anyway I go first.. Just had my car dynoed at BMT , im sure Sam will remember me ;)

Car:

------

-Skyline R33 GTST Type-M

Mods:

-------

-2 Stage Boost Controller (set to 11 psi, no spikes)

-3" Dump/Front pipe

-3" Cat

-3" Exhaust

-Apexi SAFC tuned from Sam himself

-NGK Plenium Spark Plugs gapped to 0.8mm

Result:

---------

-127rwkw

Is that abit too low? I know that the BMT dyno is more accurate than all the other Dynos out there and that other dynos run higher. Just wanna see what other people had acheived from BMT :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26690-bmt-dyno-results/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

ive heard it is more conservative.. i read somewhere a car was put on the bmt dyno and it got well i forget :P but then the same car was put on the dyno at auto salon and it was much higher. Does the word conservative mean more accurate?

i was rather shocked at 127rwkw i must say. the car should me more then that stock

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26690-bmt-dyno-results/#findComment-563745
Share on other sites

It is always hard to say more accuracy but I think all dynos are conservative compared to Autosalon. I dont know about BMT's as I use Ben at RacePace and Simon's at Nizpro that are different but come up with very similar figures that are usually consevative by other dyno's standard.

Mick.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26690-bmt-dyno-results/#findComment-563794
Share on other sites

yes dude, everything seems ok. turbo spinning, only got stock intercooler though :P i was shocked myself also.. its really weird, timed myself 0-100km using the apexi RSM and scored 5.8sec? my car isn't that sloww as i can feel the pull in it but why 127rwkw that puzzles me.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26690-bmt-dyno-results/#findComment-563807
Share on other sites

Hey Eric 127rwkw is a bit low considering ur car is an auto with auto u loose 10-15rwkw easy I got 140rwkw when mine was auto with 11psi boost 3" cat back zorst and tuned safc on BGT's dyno about 2yrs ago it could be the dyno itself. ur 0-100 time is pretty respectable so u might actually have more than what the dyno shows that would be my theory anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26690-bmt-dyno-results/#findComment-563971
Share on other sites

guys just to let u know most older dynos are not very accurate and generally put out a lot higher readings... all the new dynos that are around are genuine readings which u should really go by... it may only be low 120s but i bet it will beat or stay up with cars that have dynoed 180rwkw on other dynos.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26690-bmt-dyno-results/#findComment-564030
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Reasonably hard, although I haven't run it with the new Endless setup yet. The old brakes were F50's on 335mm rotors and the car did a 1:40.6 at Phillip Island which is a reasonable time, I'm seeing high 600s on the temperature paint. A guy I know ran the Endless fluid at WTAC without issues and he was doing 1:33's I think (Evo) with a 355/332 setup. I don't get out to the track as much as I'd like but we put the car on the hoist and spanner check every bolt and re-paint mark everything, bleed the brakes, change the fuel, check the coolant system and re-bleed blah blah blah before every event. Motorsport is expensive, RB's are expensive so a couple of hours before an event is time well spent. It's also a net time saving because if you can keep your RB from self destructing it saves you time in the long term!
    • Welcome Alice......hope you have a bit more luck from here on! What was done in the build?  
    • Hello! I'm new here, I have an R33 GTST that is currently being finished up! Last year was pretty rough, blew two stock turbos so I decided to build the car. Has been down since November, but I get it back next weekend!
    • Hello, I believe my car was imported to America in the 2000s by Kaizo Industries. Would anyone be able to help me find more info on them? I've only found all the basic stuff like that paul walker bnr34, them being shutdown by feds, just stuff like that. Any help would be much appreciated, thanks!
    • I am using Motec M150.  I am not working on the car myself actually.  My workshop is giving all these info, they are quite reputable in the industry and are very familiar with Motec and RBs and have done a few big setups with VCam and single turbo on RBs.  In fact, they built and tuned my engine from day one.  But they are stumped with my engine at the moment and cannot work out how come the compression is so low with the VCam. They told me that they have now swapped in some Kelford cams (without the VCam) and can achieve around 130psi compression and the low end torque is better, but now the engine is doughy as.  It boosts and peaks at more than 1000rpm slower, with twin HKS GTIII RS, it doesn't get full boost until over 5000rpm. I have always thought the VCam was a bit disappointing at the low rpm. To a point I had to ride the clutch a fair bit to get up a small hill from stand still.  That was when I had a clutch.  Now changing to a 8HP, I don't have that luxury and this problem has become a major issue. I am beginning to think the VCam never work since the day it was installed.  Maybe it was just sitting at the most advanced point, that is why it went good at top end but very ordinary at the bottom.  Therefore, with the help of the Holinger 6 speed and paddle shift, as long as it was moving, it drove pretty good.
×
×
  • Create New...