Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thanks dude. much appreciated. in the end i have researched my butt off to make sure im doing the right thing! and i know i am...sure its 30k but i know its gonna be worth it in the end lol :P im happy with my decision.

Well, stroking a 2.5 to a 2.7 is going to adversely effect you compression ratio and make the engine more prone to detonation, you need to shift a huge amount of air for 500kw, the two of these add up to disaster. But I think the sc and engine will run out of huff long before then.

Demotivation09.jpg

Edited by The Mundi
  • Replies 134
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

lolz na man she wants to do something unique like blow her car; thats different!

jokes aside, i like the charged route...check out the s15 twincharged which is really cool (i know its turbocharged too) but in the US they are selling quite a few supercharger kits for bmw 3 series with great results! aim for a reasonable amount of power like 400ish hp from an efficient supercharger and you can have a torque monster

The bmw kit is stealth; anodised black it just blends in with the engine covers so it can be made 'stealthy' im a big fan

Well now that I've read this from start to finish I'll comment:

To ahjosh - your a knob.

To the 34 girl - I think you may need to rethink the numbers, I know you say you have done "alot" of research and Im not doubting that. What I am doubting is the ability of a stroked 2.5L engine being able to produce 750Hp with a supercharger.

Regardless of what you do during this rebuild it simply won't flow enough - and if it does it will last all of about 1 day running 40 psi.

I don't mean any disrespect, but have you seen anyone get near these results with an RB25? or RB27? Best I've heard of is about ~200kw

At the end of the day - your car and your money so do what you want. But when its done don't expect people not to say "I told you so"

My 2 cents

Well now that I've read this from start to finish I'll comment:

To ahjosh - your a knob.

To the 34 girl - I think you may need to rethink the numbers, I know you say you have done "alot" of research and Im not doubting that. What I am doubting is the ability of a stroked 2.5L engine being able to produce 750Hp with a supercharger.

Regardless of what you do during this rebuild it simply won't flow enough - and if it does it will last all of about 1 day running 40 psi.

I don't mean any disrespect, but have you seen anyone get near these results with an RB25? or RB27? Best I've heard of is about ~200kw

At the end of the day - your car and your money so do what you want. But when its done don't expect people not to say "I told you so"

My 2 cents

totally agree with u on the fact tht ahjosh is a knob and the chick... but u can take a rb25 is capable of just more than ~200kw. im currently puttin gout 250rwkw....

but yea... 500kw even after increasing to 2.7L is just a joke.

totally agree with u on the fact tht ahjosh is a knob and the chick... but u can take a rb25 is capable of just more than ~200kw. im currently puttin gout 250rwkw....

but yea... 500kw even after increasing to 2.7L is just a joke.

he's referring to using a supercharger...

RB25's can make a shedload more than 200rwkw - has been proven many times, just not with superchargers...

there's a difference in the exponential power that a turbo makes and the linear power that a supercharger works. Also due to the supercharger's direct attachment to the engine (wheras a turbo works independently off the exhaust) there's a loss incurred. So just because a turbo can let an RB25 make more than 200 easily, doesn't mean a supercharger's gonna be just as easy.

just regarding the rb motor..i can't double check, but isn't there a few 1000hp skylines? what engines were they using? probably would be helpful looking up what exactly they did

Getting the horsepower from a supercharger isn't the problem. Getting the horsepower from a low compression engine to turn the supercharger to begin with will be a problem.

Maybe I should get all of my engineering/car manual stuff out and write up a FAQ on superchargers. It sure would stop a lot of speculation... Hell I'm going to do it.

EDIT: Oh and superchargers don't neccessarily make linear power gains. Centrifugal superchargers have a somewhat similar power curve to a turbo due to their design. Hell don't worry I'll write this FAQ up and be done with it.

Edited by R33_Dude

It's not hard to tell that no-one has done any real research into it.... 2 seconds of RB supercharger kit found one to suit an RB30 off the shelf.

Castlemain Rod shop do a SC14 kit for an RB30. I'm sure you could use that kit and modify the outlet pipe to suit the NEO. As for wasting cash, a complete kit cost $2400. Easy.

Here's the link

So now go do it.

Ok so lets just say that "hyperthiticly" I'm considering supercharging my r34 skyline as im on my p's,will a sc14 supercharger make enough difference to bother with and would it be hard to hide,I'd plan on setting up a hiden on/off button so i can use it when im on the track and then turn it of for daily driving :)

What will i need? other then the supercharger and do i need to add anything,would i be able to do it myself without any hasel's?

Stick to NA on Ps and turbos on full licence.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes, while being... strictly unnecessary. Tuning is a bit like quantum physics. You don't need to understand what Schroedinger's equation actually means. You just need to run the computation and accept the answers. With tuning, you just push page up/down until the exhaust tells you that you've got the fuel right. The VE can stay hidden behind the curtain like the Wizard of Oz and you'll never need to know what he looked like.
    • The second part yes, the first part about easy VE calculation is something I've seen a few people talk about online.
    • You 100% could do that, would save money on a gym membership lol. But yeah, getting a cordless orbital sander will feel priceless coming from doing it manually.  Good luck with it mate
    • I initially was going to do the whole car with a block then realised, it would be a bigger monster of the job 😂 I guess that's all part of the learning process. I appreciate all that advice, I think I got a good idea on how to tackle this whole job.
    • I admire your efforts with the scuff pad.  As a mere mortal, I use this for the baulk of my sanding work- https://sydneytools.com.au/product/milwaukee-m18bos125-0-18v-li-ion-cordless-125mm-5-random-orbital-sander-skin-only Yes you can easily create a low spot while sanding. There are 2 types of filler, 1 part of 2 part. The 2 part filler will get used for large corrections and the 1 part filler will get used for pin holes and areas that only need slight filling.  Depending on how zealous you are with the sander (very easy to do with a power tool) or if you are chasing rust etc, yes those low spots will need to get filled or you will end up with a very obvious defects in the paint.  Using the guide coat and large sanding block, high and low areas will be revealed (watch youtube videos for a good visual on this). Its up to you if you think its worth the effort to make the car completely flat before you spray it (you make it flat by filling the low areas).  At the end of the day, it comes down to time. The end result comes from the level of prep put in to the car. If you want a perfect result, you have to put in the time during the prep stage or else it will be impossible to achieve a perfect result during the spraying process. 
×
×
  • Create New...