Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey V35'ers

Hoping for people running a lightweight flywheel to give some feedback/opinion as to how it changed the car ?

My mech recommended me to get a lightweight flywheel as my next mod and my clutch has done near 60 thou so probably a good time to start researching :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/267462-anyone-with-lightweight-flywheel/
Share on other sites

hey mate

im going to be redoing my clutch soon as it is too on the way out at 55,000kms

my mechanic is bringing in his own line of coppermix clutches with lightened flywheels

im going to be a mule for him, so ill let you know how it goes

Mine apparently came with one from Japan, so can't really compare the before/after, but it drives well :thumbsup:

Although it seems to be correct because of a very small downside, if you start the car when it is warm the computer doesn't catch and hold the revs at 500rpm with no throttle, so just have to depress the accelerator a little after starting when warm, then after a few seconds it's all good, could maybe be adjusted, might mention it next time I get it serviced but no biggie.

Be interesting to see how it goes BLISTC, definitely keep us up to date! What weight will the flywheel be ?

Oaksey, i've also never heard of that phenomenon before in regards to running a lightweight flywheel. Usually, a car equipped with one will make audible (inside the cabin even) metal cling clang etc noises while just coasting around with the clutch engaged. Do you get that ?

Think my next mod might be custom tune actually, just found out some new stuff today :)

i m hving similar problem, 2 different mechs said that it should be the o2 sensor problem (and the light is also on, shown in speedo)

I gotta depress every time (once little depress) i start the car when it is warm or above cold.. or else it will just stall..

No, i dont have the aftermarket flywheel.. so i dont think tat is the problem caused..

Mine apparently came with one from Japan, so can't really compare the before/after, but it drives well :)

Although it seems to be correct because of a very small downside, if you start the car when it is warm the computer doesn't catch and hold the revs at 500rpm with no throttle, so just have to depress the accelerator a little after starting when warm, then after a few seconds it's all good, could maybe be adjusted, might mention it next time I get it serviced but no biggie.

when i get a V35 this was one of the mods i'd been thinking of, very interested to know the gains associated with the new flywheel, apparently, bare with me here cos im a complete newbie at this whole car thing, but apparntly, u cant really measure HP gains, or at least ive never seen any associated with a new light weight flywheel. but i think becuase its lighter it spins up faster and more easily, due to half the weight of the original. so in saying that i dont think u can measure its gains HP wise, y not measure it 0-100 wise, as in say u do 3 runs, and get an average, then after the flywheel do 3 runs again and get another aveage, same place, temp etc etc.

can someone else please spread some light on the situation/what ive just said. cheers.

when i get a V35 this was one of the mods i'd been thinking of, very interested to know the gains associated with the new flywheel, apparently, bare with me here cos im a complete newbie at this whole car thing, but apparntly, u cant really measure HP gains, or at least ive never seen any associated with a new light weight flywheel. but i think becuase its lighter it spins up faster and more easily, due to half the weight of the original. so in saying that i dont think u can measure its gains HP wise, y not measure it 0-100 wise, as in say u do 3 runs, and get an average, then after the flywheel do 3 runs again and get another aveage, same place, temp etc etc.

can someone else please spread some light on the situation/what ive just said. cheers.

your pretty much right on this one, a fly wheel mod does nothing for power but instead directly affects response.

Less weight means less inertia, so faster spin up, and also importantly, faster spin down.

This means that the car will be revier, on the flat should accelerate faster, but also will decelerate faster at times when the engine is under too high a load, such as going up a steep hill in a high gear. Basically the revs will drop faster and you'll need to shift down sooner.

Other than that its pretty straight forward, think of the flywheel as a battery for the engines momentum... heavier ones take longer to charge but hold more and as such take longer to discharge, lighter ones charge quick and lose charge quick.

Hoping for people running a lightweight flywheel to give some feedback/opinion as to how it changed the car ?

I had a JUN 14lb flywheel in my car, mated to an OEM clutch.

At low RPM it rattles, especially when you load the driveline in a higher gear.

The acceleration was improved, and when using the clutch the RPM didn't flare as much (despite a lack of throttle pedal input) and dropped faster, making it easier to upchange faster smoothly. Heel-toe changes were also easier to do since the throttle was more responsive to blips.

I did lose some ability to go up some hills in top gear, and having to change a bit more did negatively affect economy while commuting.

All in all, a worthwhile purchase for a performance driver. I don't think I could go back.

The JUN is for sale now, since I've got a Nismo Coppermix in the car.

Although it seems to be correct because of a very small downside, if you start the car when it is warm the computer doesn't catch and hold the revs at 500rpm with no throttle, so just have to depress the accelerator a little after starting when warm, then after a few seconds it's all good, could maybe be adjusted, might mention it next time I get it serviced but no biggie.

I've heard of a similar problem. The guy I bought my JUN from had the same problem, plus he found himself having to ride the clutch in from higher RPM (like 2K) to not stall. Mind you, his car had a rebuilt engine to Nismo S1 spec (internals, head work, cams, etc) which made it a little more sensitive to drops in low end torque.

I get a similar problem when I disconnect my ABS. Sometimes when I start the car it'll stall without a blip. Sometimes if I clutch in for a long period the revs will drop and it will stall, so I'll quite often have the engine cut out when coming to a halt. Plugging the ABS back in stops it.

Edited by scathing
  • 4 months later...

did any1 get a lightweight flywheel?

1 bloke i know put a different flywheel in and he had a lot of drama with vibration/rattling on idle/low rpm because the standard 1 has a gel pack in the centre to stop the vibrations, his was so bad he changed it back to the stocko fly

Anyone tried the ORC clutch + lightweight fly yet? If so, what are your impressions?

I purchased the same kit a while ago but havent bothered installing it... a bit worried given the negative comments floating around regarding other brands.

DSC00913.JPG

if you want the lightened flywheels that don't annoy your from the Cement Mixer sound. Get either Nismo or the JUN.

Nismo i had experienced with, and Jun Flywheels my friend did it. It has a very minimal cement mixer sort off noise but livable.

Cheers

did any1 get a lightweight flywheel?

1 bloke i know put a different flywheel in and he had a lot of drama with vibration/rattling on idle/low rpm because the standard 1 has a gel pack in the centre to stop the vibrations, his was so bad he changed it back to the stocko fly

After reading a lot of reviews on G35 driver and 350zTech, I went with a JWT Clutch and Flywheel combo (14lb flywheel) from Concept Z Performance (ebay store) and would say there has been minimal increase in grinding/chatter noise (maybe 20% louder at idle and about the same if <2000rpm and the engine is under load e.g. climbing a hill, but no noise once above that rpm range). There was a 'slight' loss of torque (although we are talking about driving a manual, so if an extra gear change up a hill is going to be a deal breaker... well?). I can't comment on the effects on fuel economy as the car is a weekend/track only car and rarely travels the same route often enough to compare.

Positives are noticably quicker acceleration (VDC wants to kick in more often now when getting away from traffic lights, even when just trying for just a usual to moderate takeoff) and much easier heel /toe down changes (easier to match the revs, and no more forward lurches if you get the revs wrong going down through the gears). I think this alone really makes the car feel more performance oriented and more enjoyable to drive especially on a twisty road.

If you are thinking about the JWT clutch as well, I would say the clutch it's about 30% stiffer than stock (probably to the point that if you have a daily drive and do "bumper to bumper" traffic it's going to get a bit uncomfortable, but if you just weekend/cruise/joyride/track, then it's fine). But if you do the cafe/latte scene, then you might need to practice reverse parking once or twice before hitting the Mini Cooper sized parking spots, as the clutch has about half the 'slip' of the stock one and let's face it, there's no more inglorious arrival then finding that perfect spot out the front and then stalling your car while parking infront of your soy, decaf, doubleshot, extra hot, extra froth, organic, fairtrade expresso bean 'clique'!

I would say that the clutch really comes into it's own on the track; where it's a vast improvement to the stock set, with really solid connection after each gear change and no sign of slip even after a 15+ hot laps.

Would I buy both of them again? Definately yes for the flywheel, and yes for the clutch as long as the car never becomes a daily commuter in traffic!

  • 4 months later...

Bringing this thread back from the dead.

I tried to sell that ORC flywheel / clutch package a while ago, but the buyer didnt turn up as arranged. So i decided to keep it and had it installed just yesterday.

At idle its a little louder than stock but only audiable with the windows open.

When driving the chatter noise is very loud but it goes away after 2,000rpm. I personally dont mind it, but to other people the car might sound fairly broken.

The clutch pedal is very soft and streetable compared to whatever clutch i had in there before (it has nissan stamped on it, but was very heavy, so im not sure what the deal is there).

The car feels only very slightly quicker, maybe just a placebo. I seem to have adjusted to the difference already.

Bringing this thread back from the dead.

I tried to sell that ORC flywheel / clutch package a while ago, but the buyer didnt turn up as arranged. So i decided to keep it and had it installed just yesterday.

At idle its a little louder than stock but only audiable with the windows open.

When driving the chatter noise is very loud but it goes away after 2,000rpm. I personally dont mind it, but to other people the car might sound fairly broken.

The clutch pedal is very soft and streetable compared to whatever clutch i had in there before (it has nissan stamped on it, but was very heavy, so im not sure what the deal is there).

The car feels only very slightly quicker, maybe just a placebo. I seem to have adjusted to the difference already.

Yep, I got an ORC as well. The dicky throw out bearing doesnt help with the idling noises, but it certainly chatters and grinds away up to 2000rpm. What I dont get is how it completely dissapears almost instantly at 2000, not matter what gear you are in.

Couple of ways to fix it, dont go below 2000rpm, or above 4th gear around town, or keep the windows and stereo volume up.

Only real issue is - it doesnt seem to have much torque at idle so you need a few revs or it tends to want to stall on take off. (But then I havent had it any other way, so maybe this is standard with the V35)

Yep, I got an ORC as well. The dicky throw out bearing doesnt help with the idling noises, but it certainly chatters and grinds away up to 2000rpm. What I dont get is how it completely dissapears almost instantly at 2000, not matter what gear you are in.

Couple of ways to fix it, dont go below 2000rpm, or above 4th gear around town, or keep the windows and stereo volume up.

Only real issue is - it doesnt seem to have much torque at idle so you need a few revs or it tends to want to stall on take off. (But then I havent had it any other way, so maybe this is standard with the V35)

Cool. I agree with the instant 2000 rpm thing, very wierd.

You are right, it does take a few more revs to get going off the line.

After some more driving yesterday i can confirm that it has made a noticeable difference to accelleration in at least first and second gears.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all. I am aware there is lots of discussions about jacking points, where to lift the car and what not. But as usual just a lot of "in my opinion" and nothing definitive, and everyone does it in a different way. I want to hear from some experienced people on which points on the car it's okay/safe/recommended to lift the car using a four point hoist/lift. I will attach some images of my underbody. Sills are largely okayish, the driver side jacking point is pretty mangled though and it looks like the underfloor is slightly pushed in too, but I might be wrong. In the German Skyline forum, the consensus is to use the sidemember chassis rails in the front and the rear subframe? bushing in the rear. I know the manual says to never use the sidemember for loading but lots of folk do it and it was definitely done on my car too as they are slightly bent too. Based on the images, what points do I use to not make the already present damage worse? I'd use wood or rubber blocks to spread the load across a bigger area of course. Driver side sidemember and jacking point mangled one) https://imgur.com/a/eKjzrJX Driver side rear jacking point https://imgur.com/a/W3DWF1P Passenger side sidemember and jacking point https://imgur.com/a/65UvIJe Passenger side rear jacking point https://imgur.com/a/h3k7j53 We can also see some underbody rust but so far it all looks somewhat treatable and nothing that requires a Yoshida style restoration.
    • Have you put an aftermarket oil pressure gauge on and verified your oil pressure?   Noise being on the block, on exhaust side, how high up the block does it seem to be? It could be the VCT system getting cranky, especially if it's mainly at idle, and when warm, as that'll be your lowest point for oil pressure. Could be showing that oil passages / VCT solenoid are blocking.
    • Well, hydraulic lifters will get noisy if they are dirty/fouled in some way, and exactly how that manifests will depend on exactly what schmutz is where. There is a procedure on here somewhere for dismantling and soaking/cleaning them. Replacing them with new is about 50% of the work and about 5% of the money!
    • Thanks for the reply @GTSBoy this is is a hydraulic lifter engine. Yea right i did not realise the lifters were supposed to be compressible while installed. I could push them down but i had to lean almost my while body weight on them.  I have never heard of a lifter/ lifters ticking only at hot idle and getting worse the hotter it gets. I have owned a few jdm cars with noisy lifters. This noise is slightly more subtle, it is more of a sharp gentle metalic tic than the solid and more loud tapping I've heard on lifters. I have used a metal rod, alloy tube, hose and stethoscope and could not find the source of the tick. But it appears to be loudest on the actual engine block behind the exhaust cam gear and next to the oil filter. I had mate (40 year old mechanic) go over it with me and he couldn't find it either..  Could it be a cam seal issue of some sort?  Cheers  
×
×
  • Create New...