Jump to content
SAU Community

Quick Release Steering Wheel Kits - Who Has Used? Experiences? Quality?


Recommended Posts

Well after personally having my old pride and joy stolen a couple of years back, and yes I am still bitter lost $25k plus a years worth of free time spent modding,I have being trying to figure out ways of making the car less stealable. I have heard the old trick of pulling out the fuel pump fuse but im pretty sure the car thieves would be onto that one by now. It doesn't seem to matter what alarm you have they still seem to be able to steal our pride and joy. Now people have suggested removing the ECU but that would take a little too long for my liking to do everytime you park and leave the car.

I was considering the use of a detachable steering wheel kit so that everytime you park somewhere a little dodgy you could turn the wheels towards the kerb, engage steering lock and then completely remove the steering wheel from the car. Theory being they could start the car but how the hell are they going to steer it? I was hoping that looking through the window and seeing no steering wheel would be a major put off and lets move onto the next car type of thinking if you know what I mean.

Now I am going to buy one of these kits as a deterant but was wondering if anyone has had any experience with them? There are lots of cheap ones floating around but im not too keen on a really cheap one incase it fails and I am left with a detached steering wheel whilst driving lol. I am also wondering if the steering wheel would then have play once fitted? Im guessing the good quality ones would be fine as race cars use similar setups and there is no way they would accept a wobbling steering wheel or play.

Does anyone know of a quality brand of kit and how much/ where you buy them?

Any other serious ideas people can come up with to stop the thieves?

Thanks in advance for your responses

bell or bells was the one i was going to get

cant remember the exact name though.

they use them in d1 so you know they put up with abit of shit. i think a sponsor once had them for sale here too.

i thought i posted in here? oh well,

works bell comes to mind http://www.worksbell.co.jp/en/

Thats just the ticket exactly what I am after! Anyone know a distributer or seller in Australia with em?

Thanks for the reply absolute perfect I like the lock they have to stop someone using their own steering wheel with quick release!

I had a Works Bell on my RX-7.

A few points to consider:

1) If you're losing your airbag, it's gonna be defectable and unsafe

2) The day you forget to take the steering wheel off, or can't be stuffed, will be the day the car gets nicked

3) If someone wants to steal your car badly enough, they'll do it.

  • 3 months later...

i thought i posted in here? oh well,

works bell comes to mind http://www.worksbell.co.jp/en/

Thanks for the reply absolute perfect I like the lock they have to stop someone using their own steering wheel with quick release!

Thats just the ticket exactly what I am after! Anyone know a distributer or seller in Australia with em?

We're Works Bell's official Australian distributor (and a long term trader on SAU).

- The Tuners Group

Got a racespec one on the GTR - it is good quality, fits nicely and works well. And it was only $70 odd if I remember correctly. Far cheaper than the alternatives, and it has no free play or anything like that. I actually expected it to be a lot worse than it is!

bare in mind, if its a type of car that someone knows is worth a lot, they're most likely going to put it on a truck or something then be stupid enough to drive it around in which case all they would need is 4 of these and its gone.

WheelDolly.jpg

short of carrying 10ft fencing around with you to place around your car in carparks, an alarm and club lock or quick release is the most practical option to avoid your pride and joy getting stolen. Sure, if someone wants it that bad they can and will take it, but you have to use all practical means necessary to thwart them!

Considered a GPS tracker? Its one thing to do everything you can to stop them, but as said previously if they really want it, they'll get it. I'd say some sort of tracking device would be a better option, you can find it and bring a few hundred guys down with you to go get it, hopefully rearranging someone's head in the process!! :whistling:

it doesnt stop real crooks, my mate caught crips gang members in LA pushing his lowered pickup, driving it with vise grips for a steering wheel and a old chunk of steel jammed into the shifter to get it out of gear. he had a removable shifter and steering wheel.

in the end they got it a few days later and it was stripped down to the shell

no matter how secure you think it is , consider it gone if a real crim wants it

but take all steps to thwart them......a big junk yard dog works better!!!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah. For something like boost control I wouldn't start my design with PID. I'd go with something that originates in the fuzzy logic world and use an emergency function or similar concept. PID can and does work, but at its fundamental level it is not suited to quick action. I'd be reasonably sure that the Profecs et al all transitioned to a fuzzy algorithm back in the 90s. Keep in mind also that where and when I have previously talked about using a Profec, I'm usually talking about only doing an open loop system anyway. All this talk of PID and other algorithms only comes into play when you're talking closed loop boost control, and in the context of what the OP needs and wants, we're probably actually in the realm of open loop anyway. Closed loop boost control has always bothered me, because if you sense the process value (ie the boost measurement that you want to control) in the plenum (after the throttle), then boost control to achieve a target is only desirable at WOT. When you are not WOT, you do not want the the boost to be as high as it can be (ie 100% of target). That's why you do not have the throttle at WO. You're attempting to not go as fast as you can. If the process variable is measured upstream of the throttle (ie in an RB26 plenum, or the cold side pipework in others) then yeah, sure, run the boost controller closed loop to hit a target boost there, and then the throttle does what it is supposed to do. Just for utter clarity.... an old Profec B Spec II (or whatever it is called, and I've got one, and I never look at it, so I can't remember!) and similar might have a MAP sensor, and it might show you the actual boost in the plenum (when the MAP sensor is connected to the plenum) but it does not use that value to decide what it is doing to control the boost, except to control the gating effect (where it stops holding the gate closed on the boost ramp). It's not closed loop at all. Once the gate is released, it's just the solenoid flailing away at whatever duty cycle was configured when it was set up. I'm sure that there are many people who do not understand the above points and wonder wtf is going on.  
    • This has clearly gone off on quite a tangent but the suggestion was "go standalone because you probably aren't going to stop at just exhaust + a mild tune and manual boost controller", not "buy a standalone purely for a boost controller". If the scope does in fact stop creeping at an EBC then sure, buy an EVC7 or Profec or whatever else people like to run and stop there. And I have yet to see any kind of aftermarket boost control that is more complicated than a PID controller with some accounting for edge cases. Control system theory is an incredibly vast field yet somehow we always end up back at some variant of a PID controller, maybe with some work done to linearize things. I have done quite a lot, but I don't care to indulge in those pissing matches, hence posting primary sources. I deal with people quite frequently that scream and shout about how their opinion matters more because they've shipped more x or y, it doesn't change the reality of the data they're trying to disagree with. Arguing that the source material is wrong is an entirely separate point and while my experience obviously doesn't matter here I've rarely seen factory service manuals be incorrect about something. It's not some random poorly documented internal software tool that is constantly being patched to barely work. It's also not that hard to just read the Japanese and double check translations either. Especially in automotive parts most of it is loanwords anyways.
    • If you are keeping the current calipers you need to keep the current disc as the spacing of the caliper determines the disc diameter. Have you trial fitted the GTS brakes fit on a GTSt hub or is this forward planning? There could be differences in caliper mount spacing, backing plate and even hub shape that could cause an issue.
    • Hi there I have a r33 gts with 4 stud small brakes, I'm going to convert to 5 stud but keep the small brakes, what size rotor would I need?
    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
×
×
  • Create New...