Jump to content
SAU Community

Na R34 Rear Swaybar

resh

By resh,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

iseekool Veteran

iseekool

Posted
Posted

All good mate. Just making sure :P

Mark I can understand how absurd it sounds that an R34 of all cars would not have it at standard but I assure you mine does not have one (and yes, I'm not confusing this with a strut brace). At first I thought that the owner in Japan must have removed it but after hours of searching this forum I found one or two others who have also realised they do not have one.

Of course there is that possibility that the Japanese owners of all of our cars were deluded and thought it would be a clever idea to remove the sway bar, but if they were that way inclined they wouldn't be driving skyline's in the first place!

For anyone who is keeping an eye on this thread I still haven't received a response from whiteline or another suspension/handling mob I've emailed but I'm sure the coming of the working week will bear some fruitful responses.

N-DAWG Mentor

N-DAWG

Posted
Posted

Found the invoice!

Here goes with an extract:

BNF24Z Swaybar-h/duty Blade adjustable

BNR11Z Swaybar-h/duty Blade adjustable

KDFL-101 NISSAN SKYLINE GTR NZ Fr LOWER

KDRL-61SP NISSAN SKYLINE R33 GTR Rr LOW

SPF0984K UNIVERSAL SWAY-BAR BRACKET

Looking at this site, the swaybar codes match up as being front and rears for R33 and R34 RWD.

http://www.skylineowners.com/forum/showthread.php?t=112382

The KD Codes are for the king springs. I listed them above for informational purposes since parts for a R34 N/A Sedan components were in question here. Hope that the codes are accurate, basically transposing what I have here.

Hope this helps.

  • 5 weeks later...
resh Contributor

resh

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Just an update for anyone who is wondering what has been happening with this...

Whiteline have replied and surprise surprise they aren't sure if the R34 GTT part will fit!

However, the part they have said should fit is the same as Nath has listed which is BNR11Z which comes with all the required components except the D-Bush saddles (which I'm assuming is the universal sway bar bracket listed in Nath's list).

Here is a link to what the whiteline kit contains http://www.rcephotos.com/photos/Whiteline/BNR11Z

I'm just about ready to bite the bullet and go ahead with it all, just need to work out a wrecker to get those D-bush saddles from (as they are present on the GTT) and where I can get the swaybar from at the best price.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • welshy_32ZILA
      Welshys 32ZILA and the 8HP.

      By welshy_32ZILA · Posted

      I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • welshy_32ZILA
      Welshys 32ZILA and the 8HP.

      By welshy_32ZILA · Posted

      It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • PranK
      Use text replace function to auto-link to referred threads?

      By PranK · Posted

      Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • GTSBoy
      Use text replace function to auto-link to referred threads?

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Wazmond
      Use text replace function to auto-link to referred threads?

      By Wazmond · Posted

      Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...