Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Dude, Benga is the king of dubstep.

Would love to see him play. He produces and mixes. Something that aint happening enough. How nice would it be to play your own stuff.

look at the benga detailed interview on youtube. he seems like a level headed guy too.

  • Replies 492
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

that is pretty cool steve! not exactly a turntablist, but the mc'ing makes up for it

kinda reminds me of a soulful/deep house dj; chuck love: does all his vocals and some insturments live in his performances. he's played here a few times in the last couple of years, definitely worth a night out to go and see:

edit - the women love it - sooooo much talent at his EC show a couple of years ago :blink:

i was close its $3999

xone3d_skinned.jpg<<click

However onto the debate (which mind you has been done hundreds of times).. This mixer is brilliant according to the likes of paul van dyk, deadmau5, henrik shwarz, ect they all rave about it.. but thats for them they're all doing semi live or 100% abelton performances, its not so much of a mixer more than a controller, if you're not heavily using abelton live why would you even look at one, let alone comment about it or think about buying one, its built for a purpose, it does that purpose and from what i hear and have seen it does it well. For me i'll stick to the 4 EQs on my 92 thankyou-very-much but for others its a godsend.

I guess my point is this is not a "good" or a "bad" mixer, because well, its not really a mixer, and because of this the debate of 92 or 800 versus 3D is completely stupid.

source

EDIT

there is also the xone 4d $3690

xone_4d.jpg<<click

Ive played with a kaos pad before. You can sit there for hours mucking around with it.

Good for live stuff. Hard to remember what you did if you want to play a organised set with it tho.

Had a good night last night. Hope the neighbors are OK. :)

What you don't get the joke?

Turntables are not technically instruments.................... but then I'm old school and cut my teeth on 6 strings playing Rock & Roll.

As a 25yr "veteran" I'm retired and most of my gear now gathers dust.

i play drums, ive been playing since i was about 14. i took some lessons at school, then after just play along to songs by listening to them. i normally jam on weekends with a mate, playing mostly metal stuff.

ive got some guitars too, ill post some pics later!

post-14648-1241343746_thumb.jpg

post-14648-1241343758_thumb.jpg

post-14648-1241343773_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...