Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all sau'ers...

Im currently upgrading my r34gtt rb25det neo, with bolt on mods.

I will be using a hks 2835 pro s as well as all supporting mods.

Now ive spoken with my tuner and he recommend for tomei poncams thats i use 252 degree 9.15mm lift as i will prodominantly be driving on road (mind you its my weekender toy) and the odd track day a few times a year.

Ok well im NOT looking to fry my engine, so i dont want to be sitting off the rev limiter and high rpm's as ive been told will tend to fail a lot faster and in turn cause engine failure.

Although contradictory to all that, i want to be able to get a fat torque range throughout the mids and have minimal lag with the hks 2835 pro s but as well keep some power up top for when needed. (eg qaurter mile runs etc)

now my concern/enquiry is even though my tuner has recommended 252 9.15mm lift poncams i have also heard that 260 9.15mm poncams work a treat...now im not 100% certain which would be more beneficial to my application, as ive said above i am mainly wanting to minimise lag, keep the torque and maximise the mid range and not have to rev the hell out of the engine to only make power in the higher rpm's which in turn would cause more wear and tear and failure in the long run. (alot faster that is)

what is your opinion on all this?? (obviously from experiences)

from what ive read....sydneykid tends to have a great understand of cams and how they may/can benefit an engine so im hoping he may make an appearance to this thread.

any help would be much appreciated.

thanks, Bass.

Edited by allthewaytotheskyline

unfortunately, SK is no longer with us on these boards, so if you dig up old threads with stuff he's written, that's the best you're going to get.

don't know anything about poncams, but maybe try the RB25 turbo upgrage results thread, and search in there, see what other people are running, and what their graphs look like.

good luck

i put the 260 in my car made more power everywhere

brings on boost earlyer as well

hmmmm intriguing, which turbo were you using and do you happen to have a before and after dyno graph to compare against??

also how much earlier did the turbo come on??

cheers, Bass

unfortunately, SK is no longer with us on these boards, so if you dig up old threads with stuff he's written, that's the best you're going to get.

don't know anything about poncams, but maybe try the RB25 turbo upgrage results thread, and search in there, see what other people are running, and what their graphs look like.

good luck

ive searched all the poncam thread and need more particular evidence on rev's and lag...also my particular set up with the hks 2835 pro s.

unfortunate that SK is no longer with us as he was quite the resource for information (i wondered why when i tried to message his inox it said it was full)

anybody know how to get in contact with him???

well after speaking to a few reputable workshops/tuners i have been advised against the 252 degree 9.15mm lift poncams and have been directed to the 260's as the 252's will barely be noticable and depending on the tuning the 260's should be perfectly fine for midrange and all over torque as well as brining on boost some what earlier then standard cams.

if anyone objects dont hesitate to speak up.

thanks for your help peepz.

Edited by allthewaytotheskyline

I had the 256º duration, 8.5mm lift Poncams with a 2835 ProS... was a nice combo... but I don't think Tomei make the 256º for NEO... anyway you want as much lift as you can get without having to mess with the head (new springs, buckets ect) and the least amount of overlap to keep it making power down low... those 252º have a good amount of lift they would be a nice street cam, don't rule them out

I'm going HKS GT 2835 Pro S on an RB25 as well and for cams have been told to keep the lift as low as possible if response is a concern. I think I'll stick with the 256 degree 8.5mm lift tomeis from nengun, good price too. HKS are 8.8mm lift and a bit more expensive.

AS a sough rule of thumb, for every 14 degrees of extra camshaft rotation, ie increasing from 240 to 254, your peak power will shift 500rpm to the right in this case.

That said i went from the standard 240 cams and 7.8mm lift to Tomei 256 and 8.5mm and my engine is still making power at 8000rpm.

Have very close to the same setup but i have a garret equivalent, cant remember exact numbers, and have the 260 cams, power around town speeds is fine it is a little lazy but hit 3500-4000 and it will pull all the way to 7300. In safe tune im getting 285rwkw and on country trips i can get 10.5L/100km.

im gonna try my luck with the 260's only as i was told the 252's will barely be noticable...and seeing that my 2835 pro s has a .68 rear housing that will bring the lag down substantially...so i will be able to bring the 260's in without harming much in the lag section.

what do you all think?

that will help :P

i'm just not a fan of cams... for a street/track application where you want quick boost response...

IMHO (and many people disagree) the $ vs kw is not worth it for cams.

ECR33 Series 1 (RB25DET) - Duration: IN,EX 256 Lift: IN,EX 8.5mm AU $ 837.43 AU $ 1,019.10

Nissan RB26DETT, RB25DET, RB20DET Exhaust Pulley AU $ 213.39 AU $ 247.19

that's nengun's current pricing there... so that's $1250ish plus the price of dialing them in on a dyno all for maybe 10rwkw...

imho, get the ex cam gear and spend the rest of the money datalogit/e85 (remembering i make 311rwkw on the same turbo)

without tuning costs, cams will be around $100/kw and e85 is $15/kw

or spend it on on handling... i'd be willing to bet there's some suspension stuff you need :D

AS a sough rule of thumb, for every 14 degrees of extra camshaft duration, ie increasing from 240 to 254, your peak power will shift 500rpm to the right in this case.

That said i went from the standard 240 cams and 7.8mm lift to Tomei 256 and 8.5mm and my engine is still making power at 8000rpm.

that will help :D

i'm just not a fan of cams... for a street/track application where you want quick boost response...

IMHO (and many people disagree) the $ vs kw is not worth it for cams.

ECR33 Series 1 (RB25DET) - Duration: IN,EX 256 Lift: IN,EX 8.5mm AU $ 837.43 AU $ 1,019.10

Nissan RB26DETT, RB25DET, RB20DET Exhaust Pulley AU $ 213.39 AU $ 247.19

that's nengun's current pricing there... so that's $1250ish plus the price of dialing them in on a dyno for maybe 10rwkw...

imho, get the ex cam gear and spend the rest of the money datalogit/e85 (remembering i make 311rwkw on the same turbo) or on handling (i'd be willing to bet there's some suspension stuff you need :)

Agreed :P

that will help :P

i'm just not a fan of cams... for a street/track application where you want quick boost response...

IMHO (and many people disagree) the $ vs kw is not worth it for cams.

ECR33 Series 1 (RB25DET) - Duration: IN,EX 256 Lift: IN,EX 8.5mm AU $ 837.43 AU $ 1,019.10

Nissan RB26DETT, RB25DET, RB20DET Exhaust Pulley AU $ 213.39 AU $ 247.19

that's nengun's current pricing there... so that's $1250ish plus the price of dialing them in on a dyno all for maybe 10rwkw...

imho, get the ex cam gear and spend the rest of the money datalogit/e85 (remembering i make 311rwkw on the same turbo)

without tuning costs, cams will be around $100/kw and e85 is $15/kw

or spend it on on handling... i'd be willing to bet there's some suspension stuff you need :D

Actually, thats some pretty good advice right there.

I have been tuning RB's for years and cams never do what the owner expects unless they are making close to triple stock power outputs of the motor. or is you intend to run massive boost. for anything less than 18psi and your turbo choice i would forget about the cams. especially on a neo.

spend the money on an exhaust manifold. or as joejojojojojojojojojjojojojojojojoj..... says handling :)

I can tell what SK found on their R33 RB25 and that was that headwork really paid off , with the standard cams and turbo .

At the time he told me that cams were an easier way to partly achieve what better porting and valve sizes do .

Personally I would err on the conservative side with cams for a couple of reasons .

First the thing gets wheeled out for a spin on the weekends so needs to be a nice drive on the street , torque where its needed most makes a much easier car to live with .

Secondly these RB25's are a single throttle inlet system so unlike an RB26's individual throttle system won't cope as well with longer duration cams and reversion .

Thirdly if you make the thing rev other expensive things need to be done to keep it reliable over time . Wear and tear lives at higher revs so if you can find ways to make torque at lower revs it should cut down on the wear/tear thing .

Personally I would put the money into headwork even if it meant buying another head to mod and fit when convenient , cams I'd do second and turbo last .

Thats what I'm doing with my R33 only the Poncams are in the head waiting to be fitted .

I guess I'm lucky , I got to see Gary's progress with that RB25 and it was done in stages so it could be still used between steps .

I only have one VG30 turbine housing and I wish I had two because if I did id use it with the std RB25 turbo when the head and cams go on , I want to keep mine for a Hi Flow if I go that way .

My 2c , cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You've just discovered a really good reason to tell yourself, yes, I do need to buy an aftermarket ECU. Put the MAF in the bin. Slap in the new ECU and have a think about what turbo sounds you prefer.  Do you want a 90's style BOV wooosh? Do you want a hektik tsututututu?  Mate, can't go wrong. Just gotta get that ECU and the world is your oyster. 
    • Hi. Iam just curisou about this topic. I saw this video. It is about Greddy Type FV2. I know that BoVs are about that sound but how and when to use it? I read some topic here and from what i have understand on stock RB with MAF there will be some "problems" if you use this BoV? It vents the air in to the atmosphere and the MAF on stock car needs this air back in to the intake and not out? Or is it wrong? If so...i saw you can put some adaptor to circule air back...but does that not "loose" that sound? I saw another BoV from Turbosmart and it has two "exhaust" like ports? One is for the stock tubing for letting air back and one is for "sound" and let the air in the atmosphere? Can someone please explain? This is the Greddy one:  And this is the Turbosmart.     THANK YOU!! EDIT: So i read about this topic some more and i if i understand that correctly: That Greddy can function either like BoV or 100% Bypass valve? And that Turbosmart is what they called hybrid so you can adjust what and how many air can be vented out or back in? Is this right? THX!
    • That dirty voltage drop is the culprit I suspect 
    • i cant get them all in 1 screenshot unfortunately as i just dont know how to move things around tbh, but they are all from the same log and the line crosses at the same point for all of them
    • It's about time I start work on my sun tan. So I knocked up a few parts that will all combine together to become my new power steering reservoir. Now just to produce an abundance of UV and IR rays while melting a heap of bits of alu to become one... Well, that's after I put one more hole in it for the return line to plumb to. It likely won't be this weekend, as Sunday I'm meant to be in doing some last minute stuff to the AMG race car, and the weekend after will be filled with non my Skyline stuff, followed by Bathurst 6 hour. So I don't expect to get to melt metal for at least 3 weeks.   I also managed to stuff up and start cutting the hole for the res to pump pipe on the wrong side of the line... It means instead of the lines being nice and tight against the inner guard, they'll be out off the guard.    The size of it means I should end up with about 1.8L of power steering fluid, and still have space for another half a litre before it reaches the overflow/breather. This is wayyyyyyy more capacity than factory, which should help keep Powersteer oil temps lower, and the design hopefully allows it to prevent any aerated oil being able to makes its way down to the bottom as it'll have a couple of baffles and some hopeful trickery to force air bubbles away from the bottom.
×
×
  • Create New...