Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Fuel economy between a 2.0 and a 2.5 RB? Really? Buy a Fkn push bike.

buy a fkn push bike??

why dont you come to WA and pay what we pay for fuel and you will soon get your big ass on a bike

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/3/#findComment-6658246
Share on other sites

Sounds like like these motors mite be v good to use. . With a slight drop in compression they would be good to turbo. . Good port size,vct etc.have look on a few engine impoters web sites but havnt sen any listed as yet

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/3/#findComment-6662058
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Hi guys, I thought I'd chime in with my experience so far.

My RB20DET had the oil pump fail in feb this year at its first track day, and I'd only owned it for a few weeks. This took out the crank and cam bearings, so I was looking for parts.

I actually stumbled across this very thread and learnt about the neo engine and thought the head looked pretty useful (i'm an airflow junky as its what I do for a living). However they are pretty rare here so I didnt think too much of it.

Anyway, found a good low mileage crank and was going to rebuild with off the shelf forged pistons and just enjoy the car. However, when I collected the crank I noticed the guy had a Neo engine under a sheet (only noticed due to the distinctive ports!), and before I knew it I was walking out with the head.

I didnt take the block because it didnt have provisions for turbo feed/drain, and I had no more cash on me. And its a good thing I didnt.

Its basically junk the short motor.

Mains bearings - 55mm

Big ends - 42mm

Gudgeons - 19mm

So there is zero cross compatability, and even getting bearings would be a hassle. So if you did use the whole motor, you'd have to get custom rods and pistons made as there is nothing on the shelf. You couldnt even get custom rods made with big gudgeons and 42mm little ends, and off the shelf pistons as the CR would be sky high, circa 11:1. And who knows how much boost the stock spindly rods and fancy pistons could take....and they are fancy, wish I took a photo.

So, I'm half way through my build and whilst I'm enjoying the learning curve, I could of had a fully forged monster of an RB20DET by now.

To answer the question, the head does bolt on........but thats about it.

The gasket lines up apart from the coolant return from the manifold, and the VCT provision oilway. You can block the vct oilway easy enough though.

First major problem....CR

DET pistons = a super high CR and no gasket will drop the comp enough. The chambers are approx 10cc smaller and sit shallower in the head with slightly different radial valve clearance so you need to keep an eye on that. And wild cams might have clicking clearance issues between inlet and ex valves. Valve sizes are the same but use longer valves with different angle retainers and collets, so you cant swap anything over.

The stock cams are junk, well not junk but even milder than DET cams, so they might spool well for a streetable turbo setup, but I'm looking for more. Luckily RB26 cams drop straight in and have the right BCD for the solid lifters. Aftermarket solid lifter cams for RB20det and 25det wont work as they have a 3mm smaller bcd. And you cant run hydro cams on solids for obvious reasons.

But if your planning on revving, the shim over bucket design isnt a known quantity so I've designed a shim under bucket design to run the 29mm bcd aftermarket cams. But because of the ridiculous tip heights on the valves you need to run solid lifters from a renault on the exhaust side and solids from a ka24de or a toyota tacoma on the intakes, and you'll need 1.5mm shims on the inlet and 3mm on the exhaust.

Oh, the buckets are 34mm OD compared to the 31mm for the DET.


Valve springs are soft as anything with seat and nose pressures of 55lbs and 114lbs respectively.............Same size as RB25 Neo springs though so most aftermarket setups should work. You wont need too much as the lifters and valves are super light. I've found an eibach spring out of a mazda that fits and gives me 70lbs on the seat and 160lbs on the nose.

Ah, I saw a thread on here about how some guy had massive wear on his exhaust buckets in his neo. Its not wear, its just a funny wear pattern that occurs because they run aluminium ex lifters with a funny coating. no idea why.

So thats the valvetrain sorted.

Next is manifolding.

Exhaust is fine, its all common and the det manifold bolts on.....with a little elongating of the holes.

The inlet is a massive problem.

Stock manifold is junk, dont even look at it.

DET manifold wont bolt up as the Neo uses the RB25 bolt pattern and the coolant rail return is in the rb25 location.......so you cant bolt up a 25's manifold straight either. If you get crafty with welding, well your next problem is that the ports shape doesnt match any rb25 even remotely, closest is the rb25de Neo's, but they would need porting out to size and other modifications.

I had designed an adaptor plate to fir the rb20det manifold to the Neo, and it works, but pushes it out 2" so you'll have to check strut tower and master cylinder line clearance. Oh, and the manifiold sits about half an inch higher as the ports sit higher in the head to accommodate the down draught nature.

Thats about the basics......

If your wondering where I'm sitting now....I've got custom pistons made with a nice design to offset the quench bias for a nice burn and 8.5:1, forged rods, setup head and custom ex and inlet manifolds being made. Single stage external oil pump to safeguard my investment (dont get me started on the inherent design flaws on the stock pump drive system), an HX35 and hopefully in a few months, a running car that will probably break my gearbox.

There is more to getting it all to work, but its taken me months of research to get it all sussed as I've not had any engines to compare parts between and I'm learning RB's as I go.....talk about a steep curve!

Hope this helps anybody with specific questions about the neo engine.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/3/#findComment-6971321
Share on other sites

Hi guys, I thought I'd chime in with my experience so far.

My RB20DET had the oil pump fail in feb this year at its first track day, and I'd only owned it for a few weeks. This took out the crank and cam bearings, so I was looking for parts.

I actually stumbled across this very thread and learnt about the neo engine and thought the head looked pretty useful (i'm an airflow junky as its what I do for a living). However they are pretty rare here so I didnt think too much of it.

Anyway, found a good low mileage crank and was going to rebuild with off the shelf forged pistons and just enjoy the car. However, when I collected the crank I noticed the guy had a Neo engine under a sheet (only noticed due to the distinctive ports!), and before I knew it I was walking out with the head.

I didnt take the block because it didnt have provisions for turbo feed/drain, and I had no more cash on me. And its a good thing I didnt.

Its basically junk the short motor.

Mains bearings - 55mm

Big ends - 42mm

Gudgeons - 19mm

So there is zero cross compatability, and even getting bearings would be a hassle. So if you did use the whole motor, you'd have to get custom rods and pistons made as there is nothing on the shelf. You couldnt even get custom rods made with big gudgeons and 42mm little ends, and off the shelf pistons as the CR would be sky high, circa 11:1. And who knows how much boost the stock spindly rods and fancy pistons could take....and they are fancy, wish I took a photo.

So, I'm half way through my build and whilst I'm enjoying the learning curve, I could of had a fully forged monster of an RB20DET by now.

To answer the question, the head does bolt on........but thats about it.

The gasket lines up apart from the coolant return from the manifold, and the VCT provision oilway. You can block the vct oilway easy enough though.

First major problem....CR

DET pistons = a super high CR and no gasket will drop the comp enough. The chambers are approx 10cc smaller and sit shallower in the head with slightly different radial valve clearance so you need to keep an eye on that. And wild cams might have clicking clearance issues between inlet and ex valves. Valve sizes are the same but use longer valves with different angle retainers and collets, so you cant swap anything over.

The stock cams are junk, well not junk but even milder than DET cams, so they might spool well for a streetable turbo setup, but I'm looking for more. Luckily RB26 cams drop straight in and have the right BCD for the solid lifters. Aftermarket solid lifter cams for RB20det and 25det wont work as they have a 3mm smaller bcd. And you cant run hydro cams on solids for obvious reasons.

But if your planning on revving, the shim over bucket design isnt a known quantity so I've designed a shim under bucket design to run the 29mm bcd aftermarket cams. But because of the ridiculous tip heights on the valves you need to run solid lifters from a renault on the exhaust side and solids from a ka24de or a toyota tacoma on the intakes, and you'll need 1.5mm shims on the inlet and 3mm on the exhaust.

Oh, the buckets are 34mm OD compared to the 31mm for the DET.

Valve springs are soft as anything with seat and nose pressures of 55lbs and 114lbs respectively.............Same size as RB25 Neo springs though so most aftermarket setups should work. You wont need too much as the lifters and valves are super light. I've found an eibach spring out of a mazda that fits and gives me 70lbs on the seat and 160lbs on the nose.

Ah, I saw a thread on here about how some guy had massive wear on his exhaust buckets in his neo. Its not wear, its just a funny wear pattern that occurs because they run aluminium ex lifters with a funny coating. no idea why.

So thats the valvetrain sorted.

Next is manifolding.

Exhaust is fine, its all common and the det manifold bolts on.....with a little elongating of the holes.

The inlet is a massive problem.

Stock manifold is junk, dont even look at it.

DET manifold wont bolt up as the Neo uses the RB25 bolt pattern and the coolant rail return is in the rb25 location.......so you cant bolt up a 25's manifold straight either. If you get crafty with welding, well your next problem is that the ports shape doesnt match any rb25 even remotely, closest is the rb25de Neo's, but they would need porting out to size and other modifications.

I had designed an adaptor plate to fir the rb20det manifold to the Neo, and it works, but pushes it out 2" so you'll have to check strut tower and master cylinder line clearance. Oh, and the manifiold sits about half an inch higher as the ports sit higher in the head to accommodate the down draught nature.

Thats about the basics......

If your wondering where I'm sitting now....I've got custom pistons made with a nice design to offset the quench bias for a nice burn and 8.5:1, forged rods, setup head and custom ex and inlet manifolds being made. Single stage external oil pump to safeguard my investment (dont get me started on the inherent design flaws on the stock pump drive system), an HX35 and hopefully in a few months, a running car that will probably break my gearbox.

There is more to getting it all to work, but its taken me months of research to get it all sussed as I've not had any engines to compare parts between and I'm learning RB's as I go.....talk about a steep curve!

Hope this helps anybody with specific questions about the neo engine.

thanks for the info, well done on your research

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/3/#findComment-6971391
Share on other sites

It sounds like they intended the 20 Neo to be a high revving thing and it's a shame Nissan didn't turbocharge it . I'm surprised they changed so many things in the last years of the humble RB straight six and now it seems all V6s .

The old L Series engines also went through changes getting into the emissions era , eg L24Es had long skinny conrods with small gudgeon pins and possibly small crank pins . Nissan cast iron liners into the exhaust ports you'd think to keep the exhaust temps up .

I suppose the value in a 20 Neo is the head if it has shallower chambers and a few valve train mods to make them hang together at high revs . I agree that the way to tie it all together is to fabricate an inlet manifold and maybe even reproduce an RB20DETs lower half to suit the 20 Neo head .

I think people would only ever do these things if they really had to have an RB20 and if they had the freedoms an RB25T Neo would make a better base . Actually IMO the best RB20 you could ever make would be a shorter stroke RB25 because it would rev well and benefit from all the bigger bore RB bits like heads manifolds etc . One off crank would be exy but the overall potential would be huge .

A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/3/#findComment-6971669
Share on other sites

the cast liners in the L series were there in conjuction with air injection nozzles in the exhaust manifold, i would assume it would be there for some kind of afterburner effect to clean up the exhaust emissions. . . good thing we have ecus/cats to do this now!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/3/#findComment-6971681
Share on other sites

Sounds like the correct answer is the first one that comes to mind on this topic! Which is "25DET Neo" engine swap. It's hard to believe that all your effort will be sufficiently rewarded.

It depends how you define reward. If its simply resultant numbers, then I could have a pretty damn good RB30 running with the costs..........but then again, how many people are running those and what sense of achievement is there is buying off the shelf?

The effort I put in will hopefully be rewarded with the fact that it works and that I provided solution after solution to problems. A sense of achievement and figuring out what nobody else has done already......being first to the answer is sometimes just as fun, and providing useful information to the community.

I also hope that it will go pretty fast.......haha

I'm also planning for the eventuality that racing regulations will limit me to engine capacity.

It sounds like they intended the 20 Neo to be a high revving thing and it's a shame Nissan didn't turbocharge it . I'm surprised they changed so many things in the last years of the humble RB straight six and now it seems all V6s .

The old L Series engines also went through changes getting into the emissions era , eg L24Es had long skinny conrods with small gudgeon pins and possibly small crank pins . Nissan cast iron liners into the exhaust ports you'd think to keep the exhaust temps up .

I suppose the value in a 20 Neo is the head if it has shallower chambers and a few valve train mods to make them hang together at high revs . I agree that the way to tie it all together is to fabricate an inlet manifold and maybe even reproduce an RB20DETs lower half to suit the 20 Neo head .

I think people would only ever do these things if they really had to have an RB20 and if they had the freedoms an RB25T Neo would make a better base . Actually IMO the best RB20 you could ever make would be a shorter stroke RB25 because it would rev well and benefit from all the bigger bore RB bits like heads manifolds etc . One off crank would be exy but the overall potential would be huge .

A .

I dont think they changed it for any purpose such as rpm as the manifolding and cams just dont allow it. I think its more of a fact that its a parts sharing exercise with the 25 neo to reduce costs.

The crank is actually the same as the earlier single cam rb20's I think.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/3/#findComment-6972231
Share on other sites

Thats probably true, but it still uses the old geometry from the single cam.

Either way, its probably not the best for boost.

Depends how well its made. The crank could well be able to withstand some stick, and the rods might be a wonder of engineering.......but the lean burn piston design probably wont be too effective with boost.

I dont suppose some obscure garage in japan has a turbo kit for the ER34 2.0 gt?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/3/#findComment-6972586
Share on other sites

Whoops, sorry steve, didnt realise it was you posting, thought it was someone else....this forum isnt the easiest on the eye when scanning through.

The det manifold will bolt straight on, but the rest of the work with IC, injectors, management etc etc.....seems just as much work to boost an installed neo as it is to hybrid a neo engine onto a det install.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/3/#findComment-6973956
Share on other sites

so its pretty much the same amount of work as boosting a rb25de neo , the only difference in my mind is that the 25de neo would take boost better as it doesnt have the disavantage of the light weight bottom end that the 20neo has

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/3/#findComment-6973991
Share on other sites

It depends how you define reward. If its simply resultant numbers, then I could have a pretty damn good RB30 running with the costs..........but then again, how many people are running those and what sense of achievement is there is buying off the shelf?

The effort I put in will hopefully be rewarded with the fact that it works and that I provided solution after solution to problems. A sense of achievement and figuring out what nobody else has done already......being first to the answer is sometimes just as fun, and providing useful information to the community.

Well if that is how you get your jolleys why not take it a step further and put a CA18E motor in your skyline and spend $15k making it perform almost as well as a stock rb20det? It just sounds absolutely mind boggling retarded pushing shit up hill with a motor like this, cost more, takes more time, won't work as well, basically everything is worse, more difficult and the end result is worse than a stock rb25det neo in absolutely every single regard.

Just throw it in the bin and buy a motor that was designed to do what you want, not try and hack up the piece of shit model to almost do what you want. You can get a sense of achievement studying an engineering degree, spending $10k on a boat anchor or a motor isn't a sense of achievement, it is borderline retardation. I will never understand why people do things like this, there is good reason why it has never been done before...

edit: you've gone and removed the one feature that would have made this a half decent motor.. VCT. Now I really have to ask are you just doing this to troll us?

Sounds like the correct answer is the first one that comes to mind on this topic! Which is "25DET Neo" engine swap. It's hard to believe that all your effort will be sufficiently rewarded.

Yep pretty much you might as well just throw all your cash in your fireplace otherwise!

so its pretty much the same amount of work as boosting a rb25de neo , the only difference in my mind is that the 25de neo would take boost better as it doesnt have the disavantage of the light weight bottom end that the 20neo has

It also has an extra 25% capacity so drives infinitely better along with having VCT

Edited by Rolls
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/3/#findComment-6975631
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's odd, it works fine here. Try loading it on a different device or browser? It's Jack Phillips JDM, a Skyline wrecker in Victoria. Not the cheapest, but I have found them helpful to find obscure parts in AU. https://jpjdm.com/shop/index.php
    • Yeah. I second all of the above. The only way to see that sort of voltage is if something is generating it as a side effect of being f**ked up. The other thing you could do would be to put a load onto that 30V terminal, something like a brakelamp globe. See if it pulls the voltage away comepletely or if some or all of it stays there while loaded. Will give you something of an idea about how much danger it could cause.
    • I would say, you've got one hell of an underlying issue there. You're saying, coils were fully unplugged, and the fuse to that circuit was unplugged, and you measured 30v? Either something is giving you some WILD EMI, and that's an induced voltage, OR something is managing to backfeed, AND that something has problems. It could be something like the ECU if it takes power from there, and also gets power from another source IF there's an internal issue in the ECU. The way to check would be pull that fuse, unplug the coils, and then probe the ECU pins. However it could be something else doing it. Additionally, if it is something wired in, and that something is pulsing, IE a PWM circuit and it's an inductive load and doesnt have proper flyback protection, that would also do it. A possibility would be if you have something like a PWM fuel pump, it might be giving flyback voltages (dangerous to stuff!). I'd put the circuit back into its "broken" state, confirm the weird voltage is back, and then one by one unplug devices until that voltage disappears. That's a quick way to find an associated device. Otherwise I'd need to look at the wiring diagrams, and then understand any electrical mods done.   But you really should not be seeing the above issue, and really, it's indicating something is failing, and possibly why the fuse blew to begin with.
    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
×
×
  • Create New...