Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was done speeding 36 over the limit and only got a month...then half way into that month i got done driving while suspended (by the same cop) and had to go to

court, i was giving an extra 2 months on my suspension and a $700 find...i thought the suspension time i got good on, ut the fine was a bit steep...and i had just payed my lawyer $750...ah well, ive lernt now i guess...i driv slower and shit myself wen i see cops, lol

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes, speed limits have also been designed with the worst drivers in mind, but I was always taught they covered adverse conditions too. I mean, if they didn't, then the law is effectively giving a driver permission to drive faster than is safe to do so...when we aren't allowed to do this in perfect conditions. I think you'll find that driving a car in roadworthy condition (somewhat subjective), you will be able to safely (also subjective) do the speed limit on any road in any condition unless the road has been poorly marked. The law has to account for the fact that not everyone uses common sense when driving, so not everyone is going to slow down in the wet.

Be interesting to find out exactly what criteria is used to obtain a speed limit.

That is a very dangerous and uninformed statement. The speed limit is there to state what is safe to do in ideal conditions, not what speed to do in extreme conditions.

The Great Ocean Road for example has a 100kmp/h sign on some corners that most people would struggle to do more than 40kmp/h around. Is it safe to do 100kmp/h around that corner because a sign says that you can? Hell f*cking no.

Please use a bit more common sense.

The Great Ocean Road for example has a 100kmp/h sign on some corners that most people would struggle to do more than 40kmp/h around. Is it safe to do 100kmp/h around that corner because a sign says that you can? Hell f*cking no.

Please use a bit more common sense.

While the speed limit might be 100 for those types of roads in some areas, there are also heaps of signs that advise which speed to do for the type of corner coming up. Anyone that completely ignores those deserve what they get. In some places there are also signs that state slippery when wet, slippery when icy (or whatever) etc.

I'm pretty certain that everyone here appreciates the signs that tell them the suggested speed and what type of corner is coming up so I don't think it's fair of you to say "use a bit more common sense".

End of the day, ideally, all drivers should know their car's limits and the conditions that they are driving in and drive to accommodate for that. A good example for most of you here is speed humps, they might say 20km/h but for some of you that would cause you to hit your head. :D

I've seen some roads around the Barwon Heads/PointLonsdale/Queenscliffe area that were posted around 80kph which should probably be posted as 60kph at the most. I'm not sure how the speed limits are set, but clearly there are some speed limits which make you wonder about the government and the authorities in charge of our roads.

That is a very dangerous and uninformed statement. The speed limit is there to state what is safe to do in ideal conditions, not what speed to do in extreme conditions.

The Great Ocean Road for example has a 100kmp/h sign on some corners that most people would struggle to do more than 40kmp/h around. Is it safe to do 100kmp/h around that corner because a sign says that you can? Hell f*cking no.

Please use a bit more common sense.

No no, you're misinformed. Read my post again, particularly the part you decided to highlight. Do you know what the word subjective means? And are you familiar with the context I used it in...twice?

Also note this part of a post that I made not long after: "It would be different if there was ice or oil or snow on the road". That's the sound of me conceding that there are some extreme conditions for which I would expect to be fined for when sticking to the speed limit throughout. You make it sound like I would ignore the fact that my car is losing traction, provided I am under the speed limit...which is just ridiculous...who would? Not only this, but I finished my post with a statement implying uncertainty as to how exactly a speed limit is decided upon. I don't need to be told I'm misinformed when I've shown evidence of second guessing my knowledge anyway.

Just as the law accounts for it, you too need to remember that there are ALOT of drivers out there who will stick to the speed limit no matter the conditions. I believe speed limits are designed conservatively for this reason. If you give the people written permission to do something, many will. We have had many a decrease in speed limit for built up and non-built up areas here in Victoria. Has the road toll decreased since the inception of these decreases? Nope; the original speed limits were conservative to begin with. Speed camera revenue sure has gone up though.

As for the Great Ocean Road, there are MANY signs suggesting a slower speed than 100km/h on corners. Did you not see/read these last time you drove down it? That to me is common sense.

P.S. Well said rh1n0 :D

Edited by Birds

Its good to know the OP learnt from his mistakes - as most of us have.

In terms of the driving under the limit thing I live in Tasmania which has a (mostly) crappy population but some of Australias best driving roads around the corner from my back door. The speed limit on them is 110 kph mostly. I would say on a bright sunny day with perfect road conditions plus zero traffic you couldn't do the speed limit without, say, an R34 Z tune and gentlemen Jim driving for you and EVEN THEN I doubt its possible - some of the linked hairpins are insane off camber, uphill, narrow, blind corners that frequently have trucks travelling in the opposite direction.

Have seen many a car with victorian number plates/inexperienced/people from hobart who have never seen a windy road in ditches....

Drive to the conditions and all that crap.

As for the Great Ocean Road, there are MANY signs suggesting a slower speed than 100km/h on corners. Did you not see/read these last time you drove down it? That to me is common sense.

Yes, I've seen those signs. There's also a number of areas where there is no suggested speed for an up-coming corner.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @joshuaho96 Hmm considering the drama you've seen/experienced, have you looked into getting a built complete long motor shipped from Australia?  Considering the AUD is basically monopoly money when compared to the USD, at a glance this seems like a good option?
    • Bloody Skylines, they put you through the bloody wringer! Stick at it! Stunning drag strip BTW! Where is it? Can see part of the name on the slip and probably should just Google it!
    • I mean the other day I had to walk someone through diagnosing why their timing belt was walking off the cam gears. At least one of the issues was a bent tensioner stud. Local mechanics have found runout on the CAS mechanism causing weird failures. I'm also no saint here I've documented some of the things I've had to learn the hard way. Something I discovered recently is that my CA emissions catalytic converters weren't even welded correctly to align the downpipe to the main cat and they tossed the support bracket that goes from the transfer case to the downpipe to support everything there. I spend a lot of time chasing down these decidedly unsexy problems and the net effect is it feels like I never actually get to the original objective (flex fuel, VCAM, oil control, cooling, etc).
    • At times with how you make everything sound, all I imagine Americans doing when they see a gtr is standing there looking at it and bashing it with a gun like how a caveman would with a club and hoping it fixes itself 
    • I think this is just a product of how the US market works for this stuff. Shops are expensive and there's no real way of knowing what kind of results you're going to get, people don't really have the institutional knowledge. I have heard too much at this point to really put faith in anybody "full service" except maybe DSport and they aren't really a full service kind of shop. If you go to the right place I have no doubt they'll get it right for you. Some locals have set it up right but the cost really is nuts and even now they're still fighting issues. And you know I'm a crazy person who thinks things like twin scroll, relatively short low-mount cast headers, PCV recirc to intake, recirculating BOV, right-sized for ~400 whp, MAF load, validating all of that to a standard comparable to OEM test programs, etc are relevant. For what it's worth, multiple local owners at this point have been stuck in a perpetual cycle of blowing a motor -> getting someone to rebuild it -> some missed detail causes the bearings to wipe and spin just outside of break-in mileage or drop valves or some other catastrophe -> cycle repeats. I usually only find out about this because I'm perpetually helping random friends with diagnosing car troubles, Skyline or otherwise. The single turbo stuff if I'm honest is mostly secondary, it just doesn't seem to achieve the numbers in the ~2000-3000 rpm region that I would expect given the results I've seen here or in Motive's videos. I don't really know what we're missing here in the US to be causing this. Lots of people like to emphasize the necessity of finishing the project first and foremost, but I'm not made of money and I can't afford to be trashing a 15k+ USD engine build with any regularity. Or spending my relatively limited garage time these days unable to triangulate problems because too much was changed all at once. Also, even if it isn't a catastrophic failure I would consider spending the cost of single turbo conversion with nothing to show for it to be pretty bad. 
×
×
  • Create New...