Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Heya Guys.

im taking my car to the drags tomorrow night.

it has 217kw at all four wheels with 450 nm of torgue.

do u guys have an idea of what time id get ??

or whats the best tyre pressure psi on standard rims tyres 245/45/17's that are slightly bold lol :)

and would like to know. your power and times u have ran.

cheers Chris.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268529-quater-mile-time/
Share on other sites

Depends on a few things.

How well your reaction time is?

Who gave you your Dyno sheet and was it accurate?

Who tuned your car?

Will it be wet or dry?

How good is your clutch?

I will though take a guess.

You will be in the high 12's.

Depends on a few things.

How well your reaction time is?

Who gave you your Dyno sheet and was it accurate?

Who tuned your car?

Will it be wet or dry?

How good is your clutch?

I will though take a guess.

You will be in the high 12's.

ahh sweet. thanks for the reply.. ill let you know what i run tomorrow lol ( hopefully it is dry )

It's a little more complicated than "x" Power = "y" Time

you need to take into account suspension tune, driveline, how good you are between gears, all that stuff comes into account too.

That's why you haven't been inundated with figures.

Stock R33 GTR sould do about 13.7 secs, with 206 kW's.

(Nissan claim 206 kW's).

You with 217 kW's, you should do better then 13.7 secs.

Depending on how good your launch + (clutch, tyres, suspension + all your mods) and reaction time is, I would say high 12's.

14.9@98MPH

217KW WAS AT A FOUR WHEELS....He should get high 13's with that.

206KW From Factory is at the fly-wheel.....AT FOUR WHEELS is like 170KW....this is why a stock GTR does 13.5 seconds.

Got Boost and REV210...........really guys a holden does those times....

Chris....you are a laugh too.

217KW WAS AT A FOUR WHEELS....He should get high 13's with that.

206KW From Factory is at the fly-wheel.....AT FOUR WHEELS is like 170KW....this is why a stock GTR does 13.5 seconds.

Got Boost and REV210...........really guys a holden does those times....

Chris....you are a laugh too.

yeah but, he hasn't run his car yet.

So until he does, he gets the appropriate response for a 'gonna'

14.9@98MPH

They would be alot meaner to him in the motorsport section :starwars:

217KW WAS AT A FOUR WHEELS....He should get high 13's with that.

206KW From Factory is at the fly-wheel.....AT FOUR WHEELS is like 170KW....this is why a stock GTR does 13.5 seconds.

Got Boost and REV210...........really guys a holden does those times....

Chris....you are a laugh too.

haha. nah man i know what time gtr's run stock. mine was 166.7kw at all four wheels stock. now its 217 at all four wheels right.

stock standard with the full light wieght asian drivers.. iv seen em hit low 13's and a 12.9 .

but mine has heavy duty clutch ( gonna launch ride the clutch kinda launch so i dont bog down ) at about 4000 rpm

and hills motorsport tuned and dyno'd my car.

so yeh. unfortunetly i couldnt race. but i will be racing this wensday. so ill let yous know then

i know im an average drive ( 19 yr old.. bla blah too young ) ... but im hoping for low 13's high 12's

as im only launching at 4000 rpm

Depends on a few things.

How well your reaction time is?

Who gave you your Dyno sheet and was it accurate?

Who tuned your car?

Will it be wet or dry?

How good is your clutch?

I will though take a guess.

You will be in the high 12's.

His reaction time has absolutely nothing to do with his quarter mile time...

The person that tuned the car has nothing to do with what quarter mile it'll do...

He won't be racing if it's wet...obviously...

If the dyno is accurate and isn't reading high and you do in fact have 217kw at the wheels, my guess, in a 33 GTR (if you can drive) would be a mid 12 at around 110mph.

For reference purposes, and this isn't the best reference...in a calais turbo auto with exactly 200kw at the wheels I did a 12.69@110mph. You should get a better 60 ft that that ever would've, effectively lowering your ET, and with a little more power, pull better mph. I'm just trying to factor in a little extra weight the 33 would be carrying, but yeah...anyway good luck.

His reaction time has absolutely nothing to do with his quarter mile time...

The person that tuned the car has nothing to do with what quarter mile it'll do...

He won't be racing if it's wet...obviously...

If the dyno is accurate and isn't reading high and you do in fact have 217kw at the wheels, my guess, in a 33 GTR (if you can drive) would be a mid 12 at around 110mph.

For reference purposes, and this isn't the best reference...in a calais turbo auto with exactly 200kw at the wheels I did a 12.69@110mph. You should get a better 60 ft that that ever would've, effectively lowering your ET, and with a little more power, pull better mph. I'm just trying to factor in a little extra weight the 33 would be carrying, but yeah...anyway good luck.

well said mate.. thank you very much

ill be sure to let yous all know soon

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's a good point. The rears of the covers themselves have no baffling at all though. Higher up more chance of air for venting the crank case. Lower on the side more likely to be submerged. I might be able to fit them on the sides but with both the sump drain fittings being on the drivers side the passenger one will need to make a U Turn and be nearer the turbo. But it will look neat being not up on top.
    • It won't likely matter where along the cam covers you put the big fittings. I would suggest putting them on the sides if you can, simply because it will reduce the flow up through the baffles and thus reduce the amount of oil that gets put into the foam. It might not matter, but it seems like something to consider as a worthwhile thing to avoid.
    • Well, I have my IM240 results with a cammed LS1... My Nox was 0.11 and my CO g/km was 0.2. Euro4 is 0.08 and 0.1 respectively. I'm gonna say for a stock RB this is actually plausible, BUT in Australia they were complied pre-Euro2, so the limits were: Which as you can see, is way higher. I'd say a stock RB with a new OEM Cat could? actually pass Euro4 for NOX but you'd probably have to do a hell of a lot of testing to prove it, and getting a car emissions tested and carrying a certificate of emissions when/if you get pulled over may be cost prohibitive if it's even allowable to get your car tested and re-classified. You'd have to find out what the UK Govt is using as reference material. It may be non-negotiable.
    • I made a little more progress last night and added some E85 safe fuel tank baffle foam in behind the stock cam cover baffle plate.  It still feels really wrong shoving foam inside the engine but apparently its fine based on it pretty much being the MINES/Hi-Octane RB26 cam baffle kit and the few posts here I have found of people doing it and the lack of posts saying the foam broke down and ruined the motor... Still plan to check it frequently though lol The last step for this round of oil control modifications I plan to make is to add some -12AN fittings to the cam covers and connect them to some (already existing luckily) -12AN fittings on the sump. Basically a sudo head drain/sump breather/pressure equaliser without having to remove the motor and do the one on the rear of the head. My plan is to add them to either the tops or the sides of the cam covers at the back. unless there is a compelling reason to have them at the front on the sides which i have seen a few times though they were all on RB26 cam covers from memory so that may be due to the stock breathers being on the back and the integral baffle being different ?    
×
×
  • Create New...