Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi I have a 89 r32 gtr.

Like it says in the tittle i am chassing around 300 to 350 kw at the wheels. I have 2860r-5 turbos and wanted a descent fuel set up to support them. I have just purchased sard 800cc injectors and was wondering what fuel pump to use. At this satge I don't really want to make/ buy a surge tank but i am more after a good intank fuel pump. I have being doing a bit of research, though it has all conflicted each other.

What are the Bosch 040 good for or a 044 mounted in the tank (hp/kw wise) Or can somebody give me another option. I don't want the pump to be maxed out at the kw I am chasing

Cheers

Thanks to all the people who have replied to this.

Is the Bosch 040 good for 600hp or 400hp? I don't want the pump to be maxing out at around 350kw. Is any body using the 040 in a gtr with similar power figures to what I am chasing?

Cheers

according to the specs (4.7L/m) that nismo state for the gtr pump it will out flow a 044 but what it doesn't say is if that is free flow or with pressure.

i just put a 044 intank (R33) and you can barely tell the difference noise wise between it and the stock pump, i used 3 pieces of 25mm fuel resistant PVC tubing opened up and wrapped around the pump and the arm it mounts too.

post-32350-1241955462_thumb.jpgpost-32350-1241955475_thumb.jpg

will nismo in tank support 380awkw?

Put it this way. Twin RS's at anything up to 2 bar on a 2.8 litre stroker and im fine (Fuel pressure gauge in cabin to confirm). Your turbo's are smaller so you will be sweet!

yep, no question, nismo pump is the easy winner. it mounts properly in the stock cradle too which is a problem with other pumps. if they are not mounted correctly the pick-up can be too high resulting in fuel starvation. and the nismo pumps are 276 litres per hour, rated at 3bar (ie stock base pressure).

  • 2 weeks later...
yep, no question, nismo pump is the easy winner. it mounts properly in the stock cradle too which is a problem with other pumps. if they are not mounted correctly the pick-up can be too high resulting in fuel starvation. and the nismo pumps are 276 litres per hour, rated at 3bar (ie stock base pressure).

hmm deff sound like the best in tank option for no dicking around, need to source one now...

i got a bucket of dead walbros... want some spares.....

And my walbro is relagated to lift pump duties upto my surge/044 setup as it couldnt maintain flow above ~50psi rail pressure.

I'd be interested to know what setup a Walbro makes 380awkw with :cheers:

Snowman was/is using a stock R34 GTR pump for 380rwkw, so anything aftermarket is gonig to meet that easily enough

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...