Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all...everytime i jump in and by a second hand product something seems to go slightly wrong..lol..anyway atm i have a microtech lt12 and i am swapping it out for a wolf v400 plug in ... i am about to buy one 2nd hand and would love people to chuck hints and tips b4 buying if you know what i mean..lol...

the ecu i have now has the adapter plug so the stock loom and plugs are still there which is good.

im worried about air temperature sensors and things like this...

basically what should i look out for...any thoughts posted will be greatly appreciated

cherrs guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/269685-r33-gtst-wolf-3d/
Share on other sites

Make sure you get the Plug'n'Play version - I'm pretty sure they don't have an adapter.

I think you need to modify the CAS, although the PnP version might not need that.

Check them out at http://www.wolfems.com.au/

yeah im thinkin about buying then trading..... but i think it will do just fine though as ther v400...... microtech is a real good unit though imo... some people hate them but i reckon that it made the car run well on WOT and made solid power outputs. . i have just heard some bad stories about engine throwing pistons cause of wolf... however i think thats more the tuner...

does anyone have any info regarding installation of the air temp sensor.. i know it has to go after the cooler but is it welded or how is it fitted ect..... they say its not a must but for a better tune you should have it...cheers for the replies guys i really appreciate it :P;)

alex

Well anyone can get a car to run well on WOT dude - and that is probably the LEAST valid point of a aftermarket ECU really... being they ALL do WOT throttle well, even a monkey could tune a car to do that well.

Its the other stuff in the middle, idle, cold start, part throttle, cell resolution, economy and so on that the microtech simply fails at doing with any decent effort... add in someone that might only touch one every few weeks and you'd be better off with a stock ECU.

Well anyone can get a car to run well on WOT dude - and that is probably the LEAST valid point of a aftermarket ECU really... being they ALL do WOT throttle well, even a monkey could tune a car to do that well.

Its the other stuff in the middle, idle, cold start, part throttle, cell resolution, economy and so on that the microtech simply fails at doing with any decent effort... add in someone that might only touch one every few weeks and you'd be better off with a stock ECU.

better off with a stock ECU....ahhhh noooo....not at all...although microtech is best for rotors.. out of interest what ECU do you run..... i have run stock and microtech....and microtech for performance..which is what imo is the point....

ah well each to their own....

far better ecu than the microtech but stil not all that great, trade it in for a v500 if you want a wolf.

Agreed wolf aint the best ecu out there the v500 is far better then the older version but still wont beat a power fc for ease of instal and tuning, if you want an ausie ecu try the new haltech range far better then wolf.

Agreed wolf aint the best ecu out there the v500 is far better then the older version but still wont beat a power fc for ease of instal and tuning, if you want an ausie ecu try the new haltech range far better then wolf.

very few things beat the power fc in ease of tuning and install. however the power fc doesn't beat "proper ecu's" in the terms of results.

and as far as features and cost i'd choose the wolf over anything in the haltec range right now.

I had a Wolf 3D V4 with upgraded software when i had my 33 Gts-t. I had 720cc injectors that i had to change back to stock because the Wolf didnt like them (affected the cold start tune). Like previously mentioned by R31Nismoid, WOT tune is all well and good but if you cant get a good cold start tune, your gonna get pissed off real quick. I had to get it re-tuned 4 times by a reputable tuner so i really wouldn't choose it again, however, i have a mate with a 500hp S14 running the same comp and he loves it..same tuner too..

i have a wolf v4 on my rb25.. i want to burn it. every car i've seen with one doesn't run it properly.. takes ages to start etc... and the service from wolf? hah,.. goodluck with that

I have wolf, it takes ages to start when the motor is hot. Coldstart is no problem.

I have wolf, it takes ages to start when the motor is hot. Coldstart is no problem.

OOOOHHH WTF??!!!!! ive just gone and sold my old ECU and now im gettin told this...??... maybe the extra dollars for the v500.... ohhh yeop.... definately not going power fc... having to use sensors again...... shhhiittt..cheerws for the help guuys.

OOOOHHH WTF??!!!!! ive just gone and sold my old ECU and now im gettin told this...??... maybe the extra dollars for the v500.... ohhh yeop.... definately not going power fc... having to use sensors again...... shhhiittt..cheerws for the help guuys.

where are you located mate?

and yeah like i said i have no experience with the v4. seems like it had a few bugs though.

i'm running 600cc injectors and 264inlet 273 exhaust cams, i after a little fiddle with the tune i can report no problems in either cold start or hot start at all. hell it even idle's up when cold or when the aircon's going like a factory ecu. if it's tuned to do so.

plus if you get it mapped like mine with mapping points ever 125rpm, the smoothness and throttle response is amazing.

better off with a stock ECU....ahhhh noooo....not at all...although microtech is best for rotors.. out of interest what ECU do you run..... i have run stock and microtech....and microtech for performance..which is what imo is the point....

ah well each to their own....

Ahhhh Yesss. Thats how bad a microtech is to setup and get working. Better off running a resistor to trick the stock ECU.

Backyard style but at least its less problems/headaches.

I run a PFC, always have, always will for a RB.

so if i had a microtech...using no afm ect..... for me to go power fc what would have to be done ??

z32 afm.... that it??

i still have stock loom so the power should just plug away with the afm and hurray??

get the d-jetro pfc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • In the context of cam 'upgrader' I mean generally people who upgrade headers/cams - not my specific change. I mean it makes sense that if I had a bigger cam, I may get more false lean readings. So if I went smaller, I'd get less false lean readings. To a point where perhaps stock.. I'd have no false lean readings, according to the ECU. But I'm way richer than stock. My bigger than normal cam in the past also was giving false rich leanings. It's rather odd and doesn't add up or pass the pub test. Realistically what I want is the narrowbands to effectively work as closed loop fuel control and keep my AFR around 14.7 on light sections of the map. Which is of course the purpose of narrowband CL fuel control. So if I can change the switch points so the NB's target 14.7 (as read by my WB) then this should be fine. Haven't actually tested to see what the changed switchpoints actually result in - car needs to be in a position it can idle for awhile to do that. I suspect it will be a troublesome 15 min drive home with lots of stalling and way too rich/lean transient nightmare bucking away for that first drive at 2am or whevener it ends up being. Hopefully it's all tune-able. Realistically it should be. This is a very mild cam.
    • Messing with narrowband switchovers is a terrible bandaid. I don't want to think about it. You are a cam "upgrader" only in concept. As you said, your new cam is actually smaller, so it's technically a downgrade. OK, likely a very small downgrade, but nevertheless. But the big thing that will be the most likely suspect is the change of the advance angle. That change could be equivalent to a substantial decrease in cam lobe duration. I haven't gone to the effort of trying to think about what your change would actually cause. But until someone (you, me (unlikely), Matt, someone else) does so and comes to a conclusion about the effect, it remains a possibility that that is the change that is causing what you're seeing.
    • The previous switchover point was 501mv. The stock value is like ~360. They now were idling at about ~880. The thing is, most people get a false lean condition. I am getting false rich conditions. This isn't a quirk of terminology, most cam upgraders get awful fuel economy because the O2's read false lean and add fuel - Mine are attempting to aggressively subtract fuel.
    • So... the whole idea was to upgrade the power of the motor from stock. The motor I bought with the gearbox had 'some' stuff done to it in the past, but it wasn't as well thought out/what I had wanted to do. The stock heads typically are a big restriction on LS's and need porting to unlock quite a lot of power. You can then go a bit silly with aftermarket castings to get more, aftermarket intake manifolds for a little more, and then porting those for more. <- We are here. Nobody in Australia really goes down this path (for some reason). It might* make 3kw or something more than doing things the tried and true path for 10X the cost. So that's probably why - I wouldn't even recommend it to people, the money was and is likely better spent on just CNC'ing the stock heads and putting a 6.3L stroker kit in. I didn't want to go down the 'normal' path and then think: But if I'd just done a bit more - I could have had a slightly better result. I assumed the heads were running out of flow and it always annoyed me - Turns out the previous installer advanced the cam 6 degrees so this is likely why it was coming on earlier and running out of puff earlier than advertised. The body panels were just lack of planning/no information on this anywhere on the internet and the fact they came out different was annoying. From test fitting the guard it appears I could have gotten away with GTR guards only, but I got the bonnet and raisers and everything else as well for a pretty decent package deal.
×
×
  • Create New...