Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Without back to backing with an open 0.82 housing it is hard to tell.

On the road it drives nicely, it makes boost much earlier on the road than the dyno. I am not sure it is down on power. It is +/-10kw to most other results (excluding the outlying results from special dyno's)

Yavus felt there was an exhaust restriction based on the rate of climb and the taper at the top end. I am not so sure, it could be the old external gate (pretty sure it runs a 7-8psi spring) it could be the turbine housing maxing out. A 1 bar spring would make life easier for the boost controller. Anyone know where to get one for an old school HKS gate?

Ultimately it makes power around where it should, 200rwkw at 4100rpm isn't shabby on this dyno. I can reinstall the de-cat but 10kw or so extra top end is useless to me (assuming it is even an issue).

We could have played silly buggers and brought it all on much earlier for dick schwinging reasons but this is consistent with other Unigroup sheets.

the atp housing would probably be becoming a decent restriction at that power level, hence the top end. you could probably squeeze a decent amount more out of it with big boost though.

i have the same gate and found a mob that manafacturers copies and springs to suit a while ago but lost all the details when my hard drive died unfortunately. they are out there though, just gotta find them.

  • 2 months later...

Without back to backing with an open 0.82 housing it is hard to tell.

On the road it drives nicely, it makes boost much earlier on the road than the dyno. I am not sure it is down on power. It is +/-10kw to most other results (excluding the outlying results from special dyno's)

Yavus felt there was an exhaust restriction based on the rate of climb and the taper at the top end. I am not so sure, it could be the old external gate (pretty sure it runs a 7-8psi spring) it could be the turbine housing maxing out. A 1 bar spring would make life easier for the boost controller. Anyone know where to get one for an old school HKS gate?

Ultimately it makes power around where it should, 200rwkw at 4100rpm isn't shabby on this dyno. I can reinstall the de-cat but 10kw or so extra top end is useless to me (assuming it is even an issue).

We could have played silly buggers and brought it all on much earlier for dick schwinging reasons but this is consistent with other Unigroup sheets.

Any update on this mate?

did u sort out a new spring/exhaust restrictions and been back for a new reading?

Should make a different assume the split is from the manifold to the wheel tip of the turbo. It also makes the a/r slightly smaller then what it is depending on the thickness of the divider.

yer the a/r stays the same but the with the same a/r housing in both open and divided the divided will lose a small amount of gas area due to the divider, but this is more than made up for by the increased efficiency of the divided pulses

  • 1 year later...

Well after years of having sub-standard options for going twin scroll on Garrett turbos we can now get genuine Garrett VBand Housings in open or twin scroll... will be interesting to see how these perform!

post-11136-0-39728500-1366684260_thumb.jpg

Dafarq. I was half expecting to see a fleshlight when the email notification came through :P

Hahahaha yeah it was a bit random but the inlet looks like a piggy!

They should be a good thing though hopefully!

Well after years of having sub-standard options for going twin scroll on Garrett turbos we can now get genuine Garrett VBand Housings in open or twin scroll... will be interesting to see how these perform!

attachicon.gifGarrett Divided.jpg

Ahhh nice find Lithmeister! Where did you find this gem?... they had their rapid prototyped stuff at SEMA a while back, looks like they have come through with goods.

I'm well connected, and always have my ear to the ground.

(aka, I follow Turbo By Garrett on Facebook and they posted an update which I spotted while slacking off :P )

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152761602720103&set=a.10150407102375103.644054.46944410102&type=1&theater

I'm well connected, and always have my ear to the ground.

(aka, I follow Turbo By Garrett on Facebook and they posted an update which I spotted while slacking off :P )

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152761602720103&set=a.10150407102375103.644054.46944410102&type=1&theater

Liked! :yes:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And if you want more power, more reliably, and cheaper, go get the Aussie RB... The 4L Barra and put that in instead.
    • No cats will keep discolouring the rear bar. Sends white paint a weird yellow stain. Cut and polish normally gets it out, but you'll be doing that every fortnight I found.
    • Both heads will be equally reliable or unreliable depending on what you do to them.  Stock the RB26 head will flow more. You have access to the stock intake ITB manifold on the RB26 cheaply which flows really well(1000hp+).   Arguably more aftermarket support for RB26, though in Aus we love our RB30 SOHC heads too.    The only downsides to the RB26 head is if you have a VL commodore and want to keep the SOHC look.  Where you may have an issue is drilling out the rb30 block for the bigger head studs but if you are building a big power motor you'd probably put bigger studs on the SOHC head too.  This is just about finding a good machine shop, sometimes easier said than done.  RB30 head worked can make big power just like a Rb26 head, so really it actually more comes down to what your preference is for your car.  People now even making billet versions of both.
    • 2630s work perfectly well. There is something to be said for just using the 30 head, as it saves all the pain of the conversion, still makes tons of power, still sounds cool, etc etc. 2630 will obviously make more power again, but the differences are not stupidly big. It really depends on whether you're racing for sheep stations or not. If it's dead serious, then it's a 26 head. If it's just for fun, it could go either way. But the 26 head and the effort to get it set up, etc etc, is part of the fun.
    • I've been building a 26/30 for a few years now. I've had the head built with all the good stuff. I had a 32 gtr but blew it up and yes its all going into a vl but im looking for some advice from some RB nuts on pros and cons on putting a 26 head on a 30 bottom end is it worth it Works are as follows Head -Extensive porting 1mm oversized supertech valves Supertech double springs Supertech valve guides Supertech titanium retainers Tomei solid lifters Tomei 270 x 10.25 cams Head drain Bottom end series 2 rb30 block Cp ceramic coated pistons Eagle rods Romac balancer Oil restrictions  O ringed blah blah spent a fortune And will get a girdle because the 30s arent used to handling that much rpm Nitto billet oil pump Hypertune plenum 6boost mani Refurbed astra pump thats the cover for it in the boot I did have a precision 6262 but sold it because drag car life. Currently building the ass end full 4 link floater rear end with a 2 speed  But the dilemma i have is my mate rekens I should just stick with the 30 head for reliability. Has any one had any issues with mounting the 26 head ie compression blowing gaskets etc. Just looking for some advice from people who have gone down this route. Here's some photos. Blew the oil pump in the gtr and decided to rip the motor out at the time and do a full build only to find it had been a repairable write off so went down this path.     
×
×
  • Create New...