Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

To all interested SAU SA members and financial (paid) members of SAU SA:

A quick reminder (again :P) that your nomination/voting forms will need to be received by Sunday 24th May 2009 @ 1pm at Ministry of Bass, along with your membership form and fee if you have not done so already. PM me for an email address to send the completed forms to, and bank details for your payment, if you cannot do this in person.

I've had many enquiries about who to select. I can't and won't tell you who to select. PM me if you want to know who I am considering, but you must do your own "shopping around". I will advise you however now of the paid members of SAU SA and members who have lodged their form (but are yet to pay) ...

Paid members:

RubyRS4 (Reuben)

Damo_R34 (Damien)

Rodders211 (Rodney) - (I still need your form Rodney)

SLED (Pete)

Type_Vu (Vu)

Lovemy32 (Anthony)

mrRS4 (Brendan)

YOUWISH (Lex)

Jamesrb25 (James)

Krishy (Krishneel)

RBWARE (Shane)

MissR34 (Cara)

To come: (a little nudge for you guys) ;)

Hostile (Martin)

FR33K

Bunny33 (Kellie)

NeneRS260 (Janene)

GRIM (Ben)

Sapphiregraphics (Troy)

Destroy (Chad)

MattyR31 (Matty)

I'm sure there are others I'm forgetting. I'm at work now and have things to do, so I'll add to this when I have a clearer head.

The list is not limited to those paid members above. If you have a nominee, get their approval that they'd be interested in a position and encourage them to join SAU SA. Committee Members are required to be paid members.

Electing the Committee:

Met briefly with a small group last night, including Shane and Martin (former SVD guys) and I've agreed with their thinking on how the first SAU SA Committee should be voted in. Namely ...

Vote forms will be collected from paid members. The interim Committee will look to count the votes to fill the Secretary position first. Once the member has been notified of the position and they have accepted it, the Interim Committee will step away from the votes and hand over the authority/responsibility to the Secretary to fill the remaining Committee positions according to number of votes and best suited person for the positions. Therefore the nomination for the Secretary position is crucial.

The Secretary position will not be an easy position. The Secretary is deemed pretty much the busiest person on the Committee. So whomever you vote for Secretary would need to be very much a dedicated enthusiast, be firm in their position, and have a good knowledge of other members to select the best Committee they can from the votes.

Term:

It has been discussed that Committee positions will be renewed/re-elected around mid January each year. Therefore, the first Executive Committee for SAU SA will be for approximately 7 months. This will help voters for the next election to get a feel for who is best suited on the Executive Committee. So ... the first SAU SA Committee have 7 months to prove themselves :)

PM me your email address if you wish to obtain copies of the forms. :(

Good luck.

Shane/Martin, if I've missed out anything or am incorrect on anything above, please advise.

Edited by RubyRS4
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/270115-sau-sa-club-committee-vote-2452009/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Wow the list of members is looking rather good there ruby

could you please PM me your choices, just for comparison reasons mate

cheers

I will. I'd do it faster if SAU would allow me to PM faster than it does. Almost time to empty my inbox again :P

I will. I'd do it faster if SAU would allow me to PM faster than it does. Almost time to empty my inbox again :P

Yeah I get paid sometime next week so I'll xfer cash to you then.

Will go over the forms tonight, scan then and send them back as pdf.

-D

Yeah I get paid sometime next week so I'll xfer cash to you then.

Will go over the forms tonight, scan then and send them back as pdf.

Do I have your email addy Dohmar? The forms have been updated, so I'd like to get you the 'fresh' ones. Lodging the old forms won't hurt in any case if you've already completed them ... as some guys have already done so.

Edited by RubyRS4
Do I have your email addy Dohmar? The forms have been updated, so I'd like to get you the 'fresh' ones. Lodging the old forms won't hurt in any case if you've already completed them ... as some guys have already done so.

Yeah you sent me the updated ones yesterday :P

-D

roo do i have a copy of the updated forms, the ones you sent me a while ago

I'm sure they are. Nomination form has 6 positions, not 4 (like the old ones).

:P

Whats the best postal addy for the forms then guys??

If you can't email them to me at [email protected] then mail them to 18 Jarrat Road, Ferryden Park SA 5010. :blink:

Hi Roo..

Sorry for not being in Contact.. things have been hectic to say the least! Could you please email My work address with a fax number for yourself., and the bank details again. I will pay our member fees tomorrow :ninja:

xo Nene

Roo, did you receive a PM from Shane.....if not, clear your IN Box bud.

I did. But could only reply to one PM every 5 minutes or so ... and I had a few to answer. So I had to go away and come back. Stupid rules :)

Shane's PM has been replied to. :ninja:

Hi Roo..

Sorry for not being in Contact.. things have been hectic to say the least! Could you please email My work address with a fax number for yourself., and the bank details again. I will pay our member fees tomorrow :)

xo Nene

Hectic? Don't tell me about hectic. :ninja:

All is good. Email sent to you, Adam and Chris for your requests.

Catch up soon babe. Wanna do a road trip to Kadina in two weeks? :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...