Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

DJR is right too, the best bang for buck wheel and tyre package for a 32 on the track is a set of 17X9s somewhere between +18 and +30 with some 235-255 semi slicks on them. there are heaps of wheel and tyre choices in this size. 33 GTR wheels are not bad at 17X9 +30, are forged, sort of light weight, strong and cheap and plentiful. a set of those with some 255 RE55s bridgestones will be good as a set of track wheels. I actually have 3 sets of 17X9s for my 'track 32'. BBS LM GPs for street in +20, Enkei NT-03s for circuit in +18 and weds sport TC-05s in +20 for circuit too.

no i agree about the handling, just not about the attesa handling tyres with 4mm difference.

nothing wrong with different sized tyres on a GTR, attesa's have a bit of tolerance before its an issue, enough tolerance that u can make almost any stagger in wheel diametre, width or tyre width fit fine on a GTR.

but for the love of god why would you want to? it looks worse. it handles worse. it's less economical. and yes sure you can make it work, but often it doesn't. so why?? and the tolerance is not that much. it's small enough that people have had problems when fitting new fronts with worn rears of the same size even.

it's small enough that people have had problems when fitting new fronts with worn rears of the same size even.

any evidence of this?

im not saying u should, im saying u can, pretty big difference.

u could go 245's on R32 GTR rims if u wanted, although i probably wouldnt reccomend it for circuit. but it depends on the tyres, if ur running semis with really hard sidewalls u can run 235's comfortably at the track without too much sidewall flex.

for a R32 GTR id be trying for a 17x10 +30 with a 255/40 at the rear, and a 17x9 +25 with a 235/45 at the front.

im not saying u should, im saying u can, pretty big difference.

Sounded like a recommendation.

Teh Baron is right. There is no good reason to use different tyres front & rear. There are a number of good reasons not to.

so your not recommending it now? just arguing it can be done? well that's a one sided argument. I agreed it could be done in my first post, but that it SHOULDN'T be done.

you agree it can cause awd problems but you want to continue arguing with me.... so if you know it's a bad idea why did you tell him to run 235 fronts and 255 rears? is that the best set-up in your GTR circuit experience? I look at probably in the hundreds of circuit GTRs every year ranging from road cars that do 1 or 2 track days a year, to full on half a million dollar race cars and they ALL use the same size tyres front and rear. but if you know better tell me why it's a good idea. Perhaps they can all improve based on this new revelation.

you keep arguing it can be done. I know it can be done. I acknowledged that in my first post. of course it can be done, but again what's the point? It's like saying you can drive a car with no gearknob. yes it may cause a sore hand. and it may not. but either way it offers no benefit so why would you bother? it is a dumb idea. it's worse performance wise and it MAY cause problems. so why on earth would anyone waste time trying to get it to work, sitting their calculating how to get the same diameter out of different width/profile tyres is a waste of time.

as for evidence of worn/new tyres causing attesa problems, have a search of this forum and you'll find some. or talk to any good GTR mechanic and he will have seen some over the years.

here is a text book case for you. guy bought new rear tyres and fronts were worn. all tyres were the same size etc. car started getting awd faults. when it faulted into 2wd car drove ok. when it was in 4wd car would surge and shudder... what do you reckon the problem was? http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/At...ng-t130266.html

no i agree about the handling, just not about the attesa handling tyres with 4mm difference.

nothing wrong with different sized tyres on a GTR, attesa's have a bit of tolerance before its an issue, enough tolerance that u can make almost any stagger in wheel diametre, width or tyre width fit fine on a GTR.

There is stuff all tolerance when you want the system to work properly.

Been there done that a million times over.

Ill tell you the biggest tire you will fit on an R32 GTR is a 320 wide rear slick and a 300 wide front slick.

My main issue with guard rolling is the paintwork, I've never had it done to any cars I've owned before, so I'm alittle worried about disadvantages of getting them done.

Not nessisarily true,

I have several GTR's running very different tire sizes and only one of them has this issue.

the VDC system on our Z picks up tread depth diffenernce however im yet to find a GTR thats this picky.

Im running 255/45's and 255/40's on one car with no issues, and another 34 GTR with 265/40's and 265/45's again without any problems.

Only reason tire sizes are different is they all come off different cars in pairs and make do as street tires.

There is stuff all tolerance when you want the system to work properly.

Been there done that a million times over.

Ill tell you the biggest tire you will fit on an R32 GTR is a 320 wide rear slick and a 300 wide front slick.

I just happened to have finished reading the other thread when you posted up here, so

Does this mean that you ended up having issues with those cars that had differing sized tyres front to rear??

I realise that the other post was 3 years ago but just curious as to the complete about face on this one??

I mainly ask as I did also get the occasioal 4WD fault on my GTR just before I replaced a set of rear tyres that were on the wear indicators while the fronts were approximately 75% still. Would flicker and light up the light in the dash just as the car started to roll.

Have not had another fault since putting new tyres on the rear.

here is a text book case for you. guy bought new rear tyres and fronts were worn. all tyres were the same size etc. car started getting awd faults. when it faulted into 2wd car drove ok. when it was in 4wd car would surge and shudder... what do you reckon the problem was? http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/At...ng-t130266.html

thanks for the link, gave me this quote:

Not nessisarily true,

I have several GTR's running very different tire sizes and only one of them has this issue.

the VDC system on our Z picks up tread depth diffenernce however im yet to find a GTR thats this picky.

Im running 255/45's and 255/40's on one car with no issues, and another 34 GTR with 265/40's and 265/45's again without any problems.

Only reason tire sizes are different is they all come off different cars in pairs and make do as street tires.

maybe risking later down the track had issues? which wouldnt surprise me however as they are a lot larger diferences than what we are talking about here, but still worth the quote.

Sounded like a recommendation.

Teh Baron is right. There is no good reason to use different tyres front & rear. There are a number of good reasons not to.

yeh and i later took it back and agreed that it wasnt a good balance for handling, whilst keeping with my argument that it wasnt an issue for the ATTESA. i didnt really word it very well, i shouldnt have said "this is what id do" as its not, i was just giving him an idea of what is possible. it wasnt a very clear post i admit.

as i mentioned i was more focused on wheel size/ offset for ability for maximum tyre width, front to rear. i admit i was being fairly conservative with the tyre width, but in fairness i was allowing for a low camber, low ride height setup. in a lot of these cases as mentioned the reason why a lot of these people are able to fit large tyres is because there cars are high enough that ur not compressing the tyre very far if at all into the guard (mainly at the front)

my honest reccomendation would be to roll the guards and go 17x9.5 +20 all round with 255/40's all round. as soon as u go beyond 255 in a 17" ur looking at much bigger $$.

I actually found that despite the system appearing to work okay it was not working at its best.

No damage was ever done but after using an AWD dyno the differance become obvious in the front to rear split compared to what it should have bee.

  • 4 weeks later...

i just got my hands on some R34 gtr rims and now i run federal 595's 265 R17 all round

that and some tein HA coilovers

best mod i have ever done it shits all over standard handling

  • 4 years later...

Hey guys, sorry to dig up an old thread but I couldn't find anything more recent.

At the moment I'm running 245 wide tyre's on 18x9.5 +12 rims. I need to get wider tyre's and I'm pretty sure I can run 265's without issue but I was wandering what is required to go wider. I see plenty of second hand 275 and 285 wide tyre's for sale but I don't think I can fit them without guard work.

the street setup for my 32 GTR will be running 18x9.5 TE37's with 265 35.

You will need to roll your guards for them to fit.

Below link has some pics on what the setup will look like.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/358190-fs-mlb-bronze-volk-te37-fitted-with-near-new-ku36/

Hey guys, sorry to dig up an old thread but I couldn't find anything more recent.

At the moment I'm running 245 wide tyre's on 18x9.5 +12 rims. I need to get wider tyre's and I'm pretty sure I can run 265's without issue but I was wandering what is required to go wider. I see plenty of second hand 275 and 285 wide tyre's for sale but I don't think I can fit them without guard work.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Jdm DC2R is also nice for a FF car compared to the regular hatches of the time.
    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
    • Every one has seemed to of have missed . . . . . . . The Mazda Cosmo . . . . . . what a MACHINE ! !
×
×
  • Create New...