Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

GT-Rs are perhaps best described as "intelligent" 4WD.

Subarus, Lancers, and the like are basically FWD that also feed (constant) drive to the rear wheels.

GT-Rs on the other hand are RWD, and feed some drive to the front wheels when the system detects a need to do so. Not simply when (rear) wheel slip is detected, but also when cornering forces indicate a need for some FWD.

The GTR and GTS4 4WD system is unique to Nissan. There is no centre diff as in most other 4WD systems.

The way it works is that it behaves like a normal RWD most of the time, and under certain conditions, there is a clutch that will feed torque to the front wheels.

I believe the computer that controls the 4WD clutch looks at throttle position, as well as lateral and longitudinal accelerometers, and relative front/rear wheel speeds, and decides how much torque to feed to the front wheels.

It combines awsome straight line traction, but has none of the corner entry understeer of a full time 4WD. It is a very good highly developed system far better than full time 4WD.

Full time 4WD is probably better in mud, dirt, or snow, but the GTR system is more suited to driving on wet or dry sealed roads. It was made to win races, not drive around paddocks.

Hi SIR33, Warspeed covered it pretty well. I would only add that a GTR can have 100% torque to the rear wheels, whereas a front wheel drive based all wheel drive (Sub, Mitsi, VW, Audi etc) can only ever have a maximum of 40% of the engine's torque available to the rear wheels.

Since acceleration and cornering weight transfer is to the rear or diagonal, a GTR will always have higher traction capacity regardless of the suspension set up.

The Evo V111 (some 14 years after the R32 GTR) is the only car that even comes close. Notice "close" not "as good".

Hope that adds to the previous posts

This probably explains why alot of PRO-GTR drag racers are having a hard time getting the right setup with the correct torque split for the 4WD. There are plenty of GTST RWD's running quicker times than their GTR equivalents. This is something that HKS struggle with on their car too, apparently. Because all of those drag RWD suspension and tyre setups go out the window as soon as you try to do it on a 4WD.

Hi Zensoku, a lot of the fast GTST's run drag slicks, whereas a lot of the fast GTR's run street legal radials. There is a huge difference in traction and launch torque handling capacity between a proper drag slick and a radial.

Then there is the weight factor, it takes a lot of extra power to overcome a 250 kg weight handicap.

Hope that adds to the thread

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes, while being... strictly unnecessary. Tuning is a bit like quantum physics. You don't need to understand what Schroedinger's equation actually means. You just need to run the computation and accept the answers. With tuning, you just push page up/down until the exhaust tells you that you've got the fuel right. The VE can stay hidden behind the curtain like the Wizard of Oz and you'll never need to know what he looked like.
    • The second part yes, the first part about easy VE calculation is something I've seen a few people talk about online.
    • You 100% could do that, would save money on a gym membership lol. But yeah, getting a cordless orbital sander will feel priceless coming from doing it manually.  Good luck with it mate
    • I initially was going to do the whole car with a block then realised, it would be a bigger monster of the job 😂 I guess that's all part of the learning process. I appreciate all that advice, I think I got a good idea on how to tackle this whole job.
    • I admire your efforts with the scuff pad.  As a mere mortal, I use this for the baulk of my sanding work- https://sydneytools.com.au/product/milwaukee-m18bos125-0-18v-li-ion-cordless-125mm-5-random-orbital-sander-skin-only Yes you can easily create a low spot while sanding. There are 2 types of filler, 1 part of 2 part. The 2 part filler will get used for large corrections and the 1 part filler will get used for pin holes and areas that only need slight filling.  Depending on how zealous you are with the sander (very easy to do with a power tool) or if you are chasing rust etc, yes those low spots will need to get filled or you will end up with a very obvious defects in the paint.  Using the guide coat and large sanding block, high and low areas will be revealed (watch youtube videos for a good visual on this). Its up to you if you think its worth the effort to make the car completely flat before you spray it (you make it flat by filling the low areas).  At the end of the day, it comes down to time. The end result comes from the level of prep put in to the car. If you want a perfect result, you have to put in the time during the prep stage or else it will be impossible to achieve a perfect result during the spraying process. 
×
×
  • Create New...