Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

******

UPDATE: To avoid issues i'm just gonna set the time: WEDNESDAY 22nd October, 1pm @ 3rd Level Eng Carpark

******

after all the ruckus with my stereo being stolen at uni, its become apparent that there are quite a few forum users from Monash Clayton campus... who's up for a meet up in the last week @ uni???

Out the back of Building 72. Be there or have square stovetops.

clayton.gif

Have a look at the map, its marked as Building 76. I know its huge...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/27083-monash-clayton-skyline-meet/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ill b there, my car is there everyday anyway.

One problem though, anyone who goes to Monash would realise how hard it is to get a park after 10am, no ones going to be able to park....

Maximus - Did you ask Security and Traffic for the Security camera footage? What did they do?

Mr Fanny & Chop, read the thread guys

its this Wednesday 22nd October, the last week of uni... at the Eng carparks at outisde building 72.. at the very back of the uni

we could all try to park there before 10... c u guys there :D

btw I'm doing 3rd year Civil Eng/Law. Security and Traffic didn't pick anything up :)

Nah, i think N1 carpark is good.

Half of us would already have parks and any others that need to park for a bit can park in paid parks or car pool parks, irs not like the parking inspectors are ever there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Still fast enough to have fun (kinda). Time for a modern turbo with a divided turbine housing and a proper twin scroll manifold. I think 400-450kW is a great place to be, provided it's all in before 4500 rpm.
    • i'm not at 600 though 😢 its 484hp (356kw) at the wheels.. 
    • Nice. 600ish HP is probably a nice place to be.
    • In the US the EPA has been going after shops that sold aftermarket ECU tuning software that allowed you to disable CELs for things like EGR, DPF, SCR, or TWC failure. They also went after shops for selling emissions delete equipment. Their logic is that all cars built for street use have this emissions equipment and you cannot do an after the fact conversion to an off-road vehicle not intended for street use. Cobb, Hondata, and similar companies have basically all revised their tuning software such that going forward you cannot suppress DTCs for emissions-critical systems, nor can you toggle systems on and off in the tune like EGR. You also cannot adjust OBD emissions monitoring logic. You can still tune these cars. But you have to do things the hard way, basically. For example Subaru FA20DITs used to delete the TGV system to get spare analog IO for a flex fuel sensor. EGR also has to be dramatically pared back because without the TGVs the stock EGR map causes bad misfires. Now instead they have to implement the flex fuel system as a CAN bus sensor instead. IMO, this is heavy-handed but the EPA in the US gave so much leeway for so long and the aftermarket relentlessly abused that leeway to the point that they could actually see the effects of all these emissions-deleted work trucks on their air quality monitoring for cities that haven't met Clean Air Act standards. It's one thing to have a few people deleting emissions on their weekend car that spends 9 months out of the year on jack stands. It's another thing entirely for entire fleets of tradies driving around 8 hours a day on deleted diesels that emit 1000x the emissions per mile of a compliant vehicle.
    • Hmmm. that's a tough one. There's a lot of history bundled up in that lot. Perhaps instead we can create a new pinned thread, called "Legacy Pinned Threads" and provide links to the these ones that will be unpinned in there. And maybe put the names of the pinned threads that are linked inside in the tags so they can seen from the outside? Or something like? I mean, it's half a step back towards having a more complicated forum structure, without actually having it. But there's a reason that heirarchical architectures exist. They are logical, and if executed properly, make it easy to find something without having any upfront knowledge of where it would be , and without using a search function.
×
×
  • Create New...