Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

EOI for anyone that may be interested being assigned a novated lease over a 2007 black, 6speed manual, 350Z track edition.

Has burnt orange leather interior, k-speed adjustable coilovers and 20 inch Kruz k28 mags on it.

Currently has 35,000 kilometres on the vehicle and is unmarked, presenting as new.

Currently, the vehicle is fully maintained through SGfleet, reducing take home pay by about $550 per fortnight, and that includes allowances of approx $115 in fuel per week (a full tank is 80 litres and travels upwards of 600 kms), rego, a full set of tyres each year, all servicing, insurance etc and on the basis that you are in the 11% FBT range (ie $5,500 in FBT payments).

Depending on your proposed travel per week, this can be adjusted, the lease payments would be the minimum your expenditure could be and are $1047 per month, over a remaining term of 51 months and a residual of approx $13,100 September 2013.

If you look on line, currently 2003 model 350Z are still fetching upwards of $30,000 so at the end of the lease you could sell the car, pay off the residual and pocket $15k odd, trade or refinance to keep.

The only reason I am looking at selling the vehicle is that I cannot get a towbar fitted to the Z and I need to be able to tow my WR around as well as a jetski and IRB for surf lifesaving.

If anyone is interested and wants more information, please give me a call on 0438 942 693

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/271267-eoi-novated-vehicle-assignment/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...