Jump to content
SAU Community

Love The Beast


CRD
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

You sound cut up Roy?

GTi's GTR's they've done it all.

Well done boys!

Andre, if you haven't realised if you make a bold statement on here it seems to upset people easily. It must be the stupid aussie tall poppy syndrome.

Well done on the results guys...top stuff.

Paul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

381kw! WOW that is intense!

Well done CRD! Once again raising the bar!

The Beast will be out at WSID on Wednesday night. Will post the results.

ps. the car is incredible, the difference the Cobb has made over and above the HKS setup is quite surprising. CRD have done a superb job with this car, it's incredibly drivable (moreso with the huge increases in torque across the range), and has ridiculous throttle response.

Larger injectors will really unleash this car's true potential.

Anyway, I'll provide an update next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forget the 381kw. plenty of 32/33/34 GTR with 2530s or T04Z making that much awkw. but check out the torque curve!!! or should I say torque platform! that is why when you're in your fairly laggy 380kw R32 GTR and you line up this bloke in his 35 you get left a long way behind...

and I'm with troy. I can remember the 1990s! :D croydon autosports. GTI specialists! when you guys moved and swtiched the name to CRD yeah you became more into the GTR scene in the 2000's... i don't think troy was 'cut up' lol. just giving a little stick. hell read the blurb on CRDs website..... :D

I would say croydon autosports definitely made the swift GTi a popular cult tuning car in the 90s. and I'd say they opened a lot of people up to small capacity engines as a good thing to own and tune. not sure I'd say they made the GTR a cult car, but since changing to CRD and moving they have tuned and built way more than most and have put out some very nice GTRs. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The jibe wasnt intended to be a cheap shot, perhaps what i think is funny isnt funny:)

I still say ITSMAD was the coolest buzz box getting around when i was young. They were the pioneers back in the early 90s with turbo GTis and Aus deliverd S14s before the import word went gangbusters and they are still on top now.

LOL, so ... maybe im showing my age. You say CRD i think ITSMAD :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THE BEAST SNARLED LOUDLY LAST NIGHT AT WISD WITH A SPECTACULAR 10.8 @127MPH 1ST TIME OUT, 1ST TIME DRIVER.

WITH A BIT MORE CLEANING UP WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO GO A COUPLE TENTHS BETTER.

CONGRATS PAUL!

Jim Souvas

TEAM CRD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THE BEAST SNARLED LOUDLY LAST NIGHT AT WISD WITH A SPECTACULAR 10.8 @127MPH 1ST TIME OUT, 1ST TIME DRIVER.

WITH A BIT MORE CLEANING UP WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO GO A COUPLE TENTHS BETTER.

CONGRATS PAUL!

Jim Souvas

TEAM CRD

Jim, I presume it will need a roll cage before you can get any faster - in the 10's, damn, that's impressive for a minor-ish mods. Great job guys - definitely very close to the fastest R35, 10.48s or so the US R35.

Edited by rehab2010
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim, I presume it will need a roll cage before you can get any faster - in the 10's, damn, that's impressive for a minor-ish mods. Great job guys - definitely very close to the fastest R35, 10.48s or so the US R35.

Now that is a goal worth pursuing...is 10.48 the best time in the US/world?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The jibe wasnt intended to be a cheap shot, perhaps what i think is funny isnt funny:)

I still say ITSMAD was the coolest buzz box getting around when i was young. They were the pioneers back in the early 90s with turbo GTis and Aus deliverd S14s before the import word went gangbusters and they are still on top now.

LOL, so ... maybe im showing my age. You say CRD i think ITSMAD :P

lol, I realised you were just havin a jibe Roy, I think GTi when I hear the name too :banana: Heck, I bought a NEW 1990 GTi and went to town on it, ten gearboxes later I realised something a little stronger in the driveline department was the go, so, GTR it was. haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...