Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yep - this is the problem EVERYONE said would happen.

But as usual, ignorant developers said it would be the "best" system ever concieved... ye fken right.

If that is happening already, then forget online for PC.

And with the recent 10s to 100s of thousands of locked out 360s for being modded we can see that consoles clearly solve piracy...

  • Replies 343
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Ok, really really frustrated...

I thought I would be able to refrain from jumping into the hype of slagging IW.NET etc but;

I am unable to play Multiplayer, I cannot get my ping to a reasonable playing level. My internet connection is not the issue, I'm sure of it.

Without having anyone complain about the lack of dedicated servers (cause I agree), can anyone actually tell me whether they are able to get green bars at all? (Serious question)

meh with MW thats ALL I get generally unless I luck out and get matched to an Aussie. Still playable, just have to account for the lag.

HAHA @ shit flamin mongrels who go on Xbox Live with modded boxes, its a well known fact that MS ban at random; delayed effect works better for those who would try and circumvent the system, a la the anti cheat system on Steam. One would think that you'd have one xbox to play online and a modded one to play backups, since realistically there's only a handful of games that are big on Xbox Live

Ok, really really frustrated...

I thought I would be able to refrain from jumping into the hype of slagging IW.NET etc but;

I am unable to play Multiplayer, I cannot get my ping to a reasonable playing level. My internet connection is not the issue, I'm sure of it.

Without having anyone complain about the lack of dedicated servers (cause I agree), can anyone actually tell me whether they are able to get green bars at all? (Serious question)

yeah i have got lots of green bar games, I found big team battle (watever its called) and domination allways sends me to american games, but team death match and headquarters gets local games 99% of the time.

Been playing spec ops with a mate for last few hours, game is worth buying just for that and single player !

on PC here, multiplayer was a bit random on servers on launch day with shit pings etc... but was better last night and was awesome tonight, played for a few hours, only had a couple of server migrations which worked everytime. Was full green on pings for all the games, on TPG in Brisbane.

Very happy with multiplayer, already finished single player, great game :happy:

What I have found is that when playing team death match max I got was 2 yellow squares. When I played 3rd person mode I got so many ausies playing and was on full green. f**k 3rd person view. I find the gameplay barable with such a high ping but get annoyed when people knife me when I'm a distance from them of I get shot once I move behind a wall but doesn't register it quick enough and I die

Well alot of the complaints from gamers is the removal of modding and dedicated server support. I played mulitplayer on PC at a friends place (to see if I wanted to buy it) but seems that IW shot themselves in the foot

from what I played maximum 9 players in free for all and 9v9 team combat....that aint right and I was getting okish pings but the worst thing about it that you don't know if you are the server (IW.net picks the computer at random to be server). If that player drops out the game will freeze while it picks out a new player to host.

I love the people on other forums that are blaming piracy becuase of these changes. Well you always needed a legit cd-key to play COD: MW1 and COD: WAW right??

I don't mind playing on steam but with no local server content...I'm going to pass for now (until stuff improves)

So basically, LFD2 is getting stupid censorship, while this game has crap online performance...

Looks like there's 2 games I'll be torrent-ing instead, right after my current internet month ends.

from what I played maximum 9 players in free for all and 9v9 team combat....

This I did notice and found really weird! Why limit it back so much from 32 or even 64 players... Crazy!!

I know the answer is because one of the players is the host with a bad connection to be able to host, but isn't that saying something about how the current system works??

Edited by W1ngnut

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
    • Dort sounds above 3k rpm are dorty 🤣 I might krinkle black the alloy 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...