Jump to content
SAU Community

Eoi: White Te37's -[melb]


Recommended Posts

Hey boys/girls.

Thinking of Sellin my TE37's... not sure yet as i dont have any rims to put on the car if i was to sell em..

Wheel Spec's:

White TE37's

front: 17x8.5 +30

rear: 17x8.5 +30

For those who dont know what they look like. (I'm sure there is always 1. lol) Here is a pic!

They have RE01-R's on em.. 80ish% thred.

EOI price: 2.5k

myskylineuj7.png

Edited by Royalflush
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interested in your rims mate.

Can you measure how many mm till the wear indicator on the tyres?

Any damages on the rims?

Can you send me photos to [email protected]

Thanks

Measure how many mm till the wear indicator? Um yea ok.. Unless you want to come sus em out for your self?

No damages on the rims what so ever mate!

I'll send you a pic of the actual wheels later on this week..

Edited by Royalflush
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a fan myself... probably would suit an Integra but not a Skyline imo.

WHAT THE F**K?!

What a waste to put these wheels on an Integra!

Rays Engineering - Volk Racing TE 37's are one of the best wheels to come from Japan and you reckon to put it on an Integra.

:P

:mad:

The looks friggin tuff on GTR's.

post-46584-1244088007_thumb.jpg

LMFAO! :D

Spunky Munky you say some stupid things on SAU I can't help but laugh!

It's not a personal attack, all cool! :D

Back On Topic.

Royalflush, have you got a price in mind?

Selling these wheels with no tyres you can easily get $2000+

But depending on the condition of the wheels too, gutter rashes, scratches, paint etc...

I would keep them as I have set of 17" TE37's myself and they are very nice wheels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Dude, Thanks for your Input. Weird people have weird taste i guess. Spunky Munky maybe like Cromies?

8584976_1.jpg

After a few PM's over the past few days. I've came to the conclusion to leave the price @ $2500 FIRM

If they don't sell I'll just keep em. They have no damages on em so they in good condition. just needs a clean I guess.

RE01-R's are pretty hard to get too... So they a rear find.

Going back to how much tred is left on them, i would like to take my estimate back. As some people measure them differently. But Personally I believe they around maybe 80ish% tread left on them :banana:

Edited by Royalflush
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Removed the wheels off the car and bought them home. At closer inspection I noticed some small marks on the wheels. The one that has been marked by a 5 cent coin and taken picture of has is the most damaged.

Wheels can be inspected anytime. Located in Melbourne Western Suburbs.

Contact me via PM's.

post-55496-1244263874_thumb.jpg

post-55496-1244263975_thumb.jpg

post-55496-1244264185_thumb.jpg

post-55496-1244264222_thumb.jpg

post-55496-1244264303_thumb.jpg

post-55496-1244264352_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...