Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I couldnt seem to find anything on this but i am known to be hopeless with the search

After reading a massive thread on a ls1 going into an r32 i got onto thinking for myself. I used to own a vt s/c and loved the motor.

When installing the ls1 there is a clearance issue on the steering rack just wondering if anyone would know if this would be removed with the super 6 engine?

And what people's views on it are

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/273148-holden-v6-supercharged-into-r32/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i think the big issue here is that the cost of manufacturing things up to fit is going to make it more expensive than just dropping a rb25 in which will give it more power (10kw more just in stock form and it's much easier to get power out of the rb25 without the engine packing it in than the betsy motor). also the suprcharged motors are only available in auto so if you want a manual you will have to go new flywheel, etc.

now i'm not saying it's a stupid idea as i think doing things differently is great, but in this case i think that the time and effort isn't going to achieve any gains, or even be as anywhere near as good as the commonly used ideas. the rb25 or a twin cam rb30 is going to give more power for the money as well as take abuse much more. the supercharged commodore motors (and the non supercharged motors as well) don't handle power upgrades that well without adding in a lot of extra bolt ons, unlike a rb25 that will gain 60 or 70hp just by going exhaust, fmic and winding the boost up and won't really shorten its life at all.

the advantage with going to a ls1 is that the engine is lighter than the stock motor due to it being all alloy, and it sits nice and far back in the engine bay giving good weight distribution and makes much more power than the rb25.

go the LS1, better a/m support, just as involved and honestly better than any rb combination for torque.... especially if you charge it down the road.

Image this charged LS2 in your R32......

post-34927-1244093810_thumb.jpg

Edited by URAS

the VT V6 with a supercharger is a complete waste of time into your 32. they are rubbish. go the LS for sure if you are going to that effort. you may have thought it a great motor at the time but I'm guessing you don't have a lot to compare it to as they are pants. I'm sure people in east berlin thought their worked wartburg 353 went hard until they drove a reliant robin too... :banana:

the VT V6 with a supercharger is a complete waste of time into your 32. they are rubbish. go the LS for sure if you are going to that effort. you may have thought it a great motor at the time but I'm guessing you don't have a lot to compare it to as they are pants. I'm sure people in east berlin thought their worked wartburg 353 went hard until they drove a reliant robin too... :banana:

Ha ha so true.

The buick V6 is one of the worst engines ever made its with the likes of the rover V8(however its heavy and can be used as a boat anchor).

If you would even bother i'd choose a dirty big v8 with injection systems and twin turbos, doubt it would fit but it would fry tyres better than a frypan.

this is a killer car, let down early on by china turbo's (kkr) i think it now runs something martin imports. If this car ever came up at the right price i would jump on it asap.

post-34927-1244195207_thumb.jpg

post-34927-1244195238_thumb.jpg

I have been passenger in an infiniti with a supercharged vq45 and that was a sweet set up. However the ls engines would have better aftermarket support in oz, no question. I just have a thing for the jap v8's. I think they handle extra load better.

I have been passenger in an infiniti with a supercharged vq45 and that was a sweet set up. However the ls engines would have better aftermarket support in oz, no question. I just have a thing for the jap v8's. I think they handle extra load better.

yeah i just got given a 1UZFE.... debating whether or not to swap the 26 out of the laurel or not.

IMO its either rb30det or the ls1/ls2. Owning a mild ls1 they are quite a good motor. They rev hard and have buckets of torque with pretty damn good economy.

The old buik v6's make my ears bleed, they are horrid sounding things not to mention they don't really get up and go unless they have a decent turbo or two shoved on to them.

Edited by SLAPS

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Out here E90s are the cheapest way into a sporty-ish car because everyone knows just how expensive the repairs can get. 8-10k USD for an automatic 335i. 
    • Noted. Have noticed BMW are more 'high maintenance' for sure. They've attracted my attention as I think the used car prices seem reasonable vs other options, and the extra quality overall vs a commodore / camry / corolla or similar of the same vintage is appealing, especially the interior, and they are more on the sporty side whereas the others mentioned can be more cruising or economical A-to-B only.
    • Haha yeah I know, this is SAU after all, why are we talking about BMW's of all things!? I hear you on the 'don't have to worry about it' side of things. Having been fortunate enough to be have been able to buy a brand new motorbike or two...never really enjoyed them as much as I'd have liked as you worry so much about where you park it, will it get scratched, stolen, attempted theft, knocked over, etc...and yes dirty. Older less valuable bikes you can just go where you want and park it wherever and not really worry that much in comparison. And who cares if it gets dirty! Never owned a V8, and have had my eyes on VE / VF commodores for years but with their prices climbing so high, the M3 has come into focus more as prices are much closer than I've ever seen...is it a potential contender now?...of course need to factor in the S65 'maintenance' especially and like you said general M car 'tax'. One can dream anyway. But more on the reality front - did read the whole 330i thread as well and was a great read too, both threads enlightening as I've never even driven one of these cars! I do recall 330i didn't seem to have the same amount of issues for almost the same car (turbos and related differences notwithstanding)...perhaps down to getting it earlier in it's life so looked after better than the 335i? Perhaps so as your 130i has been good and quite similar, so finding a car that's been looked after well is the especially-crucial-BMW-first-step.
    • Nice. Dont worry about the time of not running. My current skyline hasn't run since I bought it. About 8 years ago.
    • It's also worth noting that I am heavily and unconditionally biased. I've had a lot of cars including some GTRs a fair while ago. I love my BMW's now a lot. They make no sense a lot of the time and the guys on here remind me regularly that I could get something else that does what I want better and cheaper. If you're going to take on an older BMW it's definitely a commitment. If you bail on it early you'll lose money and also the ability for it to put a smile on your face. Stick with it and it just gets better.  f**k I should get into advertising.  
×
×
  • Create New...