Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Some places are getting strict on RWC...

Without taking the turbos off, you mechanic would have to bolt on a stock exhaust system, air box, you might get away with the Front mount intercooler but I would assume you will need to put back a R33 Side mount intercooler.

After passing the RWC you can bolt everything back on.

how would a RWC know if you have an upgraded turbo? unless its an obvious highmount, i doubt they would know whats under the heatsheild?

Intercooler is legal as long as you dont have airpod. So replace it with the standard airbox. Although if you cut a hole under the battery tray to pass intercooler piping they might sting you on that.

Why does it matter if you have an upgraded turbo or not? Isn't a roadworthy check over the general condition of the car, ie all safety components work (seatbelts etc.) all lights work, and the car has no major leaks anywhere?

Page 10 - Section J of the rwc requirements thing on vicroads states:

"All mountings, brackets, and fastenings, necessary for the safe operation of the vehicle must be secure and free from damage, deterioration or abnormal distortion. All shafts, splines, universal joints, support bearings, tail shaft guards and other drive-line components must be in good condition and free of excessive wear and vibration.

The power unit, clutch system, transmission system, differentials, axle housings, and all associated pipelines must be properly sealed and free of dripping or flowing oil leaks onto the roadway, exhaust system, or brake friction surfaces. Dampness, weeping or staining are acceptable but oil leaking from the underside of the vehicle to such an extent that it is likely to drop oil on the road surface (if the vehicle is parked or idling stationary for any length of time) is unacceptable.

Any insulating material in an engine enclosure must be in good condition and free from contamination by fuels or lubricants and there must not be any accumulation of fuel or lubricant in the engine compartments."

No where does it state you can't have an upgraded turbo?

There is a section on modified vehicle, stating modifications fall into three categories etc. but also states that "an examination should be confined to checking that the modification appears to be properly executed and not in a condition which presents a hazard."

the up grading of turbo will be under the emissions area which is a item , any way go to Oh performance 186 mc intyre rd sunshine , they do one for you , im sure you have all your tyres and stuff ok , go and try them out , they have helped a lot of guys out ,

Why does it matter if you have an upgraded turbo or not? Isn't a roadworthy check over the general condition of the car, ie all safety components work (seatbelts etc.) all lights work, and the car has no major leaks anywhere?

Page 10 - Section J of the rwc requirements thing on vicroads states:

"All mountings, brackets, and fastenings, necessary for the safe operation of the vehicle must be secure and free from damage, deterioration or abnormal distortion. All shafts, splines, universal joints, support bearings, tail shaft guards and other drive-line components must be in good condition and free of excessive wear and vibration.

The power unit, clutch system, transmission system, differentials, axle housings, and all associated pipelines must be properly sealed and free of dripping or flowing oil leaks onto the roadway, exhaust system, or brake friction surfaces. Dampness, weeping or staining are acceptable but oil leaking from the underside of the vehicle to such an extent that it is likely to drop oil on the road surface (if the vehicle is parked or idling stationary for any length of time) is unacceptable.

Any insulating material in an engine enclosure must be in good condition and free from contamination by fuels or lubricants and there must not be any accumulation of fuel or lubricant in the engine compartments."

No where does it state you can't have an upgraded turbo?

There is a section on modified vehicle, stating modifications fall into three categories etc. but also states that "an examination should be confined to checking that the modification appears to be properly executed and not in a condition which presents a hazard."

Refer to the Vehicle Standards Information (VSI's) that are on VicRoads website (all of them, not just #26), they make no clear indication that you CAN have a turbo.

If fact they make bugger all reference to emissions at all in most instances. Being this is a job for the EPA.

Therefore one must assume it is now allowed until you seek written advice from VicRoads... and guess what they will say? :)

The RWC form is very general, your talking about a specific modification specific to model of car and so on.

Its certainly not allowed to emissions rules, and emission rules can put your car off the road/deem it unroadworthy - so its pretty simple.

VicRoads documents as always, are broad and unspecific and make no reference to anything in particular. Also to boot they are horribly outdated and have not been substancially reviewed in over 10 years.

If you have specific questions get it from them in writing and see what happens :(

the up grading of turbo will be under the emissions area which is a item , any way go to Oh performance 186 mc intyre rd sunshine , they do one for you , im sure you have all your tyres and stuff ok , go and try them out , they have helped a lot of guys out ,

LOL, by 'them' you mean you? ......right? nice plug

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...