Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

you need to run a tiny bit of neg camber (near flat) overall so they are flat on WOT.

problem is that when you drop a skyline the negative camber increases a lot so you need to run positive camber to compensate for the excess negative

did that make sense? lol

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Just checked the wheel worx website there's some new rims Tarmac ts01 17x10" +35 according to the offset calc I will need 14mm more clearance for the rears, but my cars not lowered coz I don't want just springs. What do you reckon fit or not? Might stick out enough to be illegal

Edited by DaGr81
Just checked the wheel worx website there's some new rims Tarmac ts01 17x10" +35 according to the offset calc I will need 14mm more clearance for the rears, but my cars not lowered coz I don't want just springs. What do you reckon fit or not? Might stick out enough to be illegal

they will be 1mm further out than the ones in my photo...

shouldn't you be running positive camber in the rear to aid traction as I said before when the car squats you get 0 camber therefore more contact between tyre and road, but I guess it also depends how much positive camber you can run

No you shouldn't be running positive camber for a street car.

Yes, it is suitable for a straight line car. However, when going around corners, the vehicle actually needs some negative camber.

For example, when turning right, the outside of your left wheels will be the ones taking most of the wieght of the car, if you have positive camber, it will reduce the amount of tyre surface on the road.

You need SOME negative camber to compensate when turning in order for more tyre to touch the road surface.

Sorry if I explained it bad, maybe someone else can do a better job.

Ultimately, the choice is yours. If you put in positive camber at the rear wheels, you're going to be oversteering if you're giving it around corners and stuff.

However, in the straight line, it will be better.

No you shouldn't be running positive camber for a street car.

Yes, it is suitable for a straight line car. However, when going around corners, the vehicle actually needs some negative camber.

For example, when turning right, the outside of your left wheels will be the ones taking most of the wieght of the car, if you have positive camber, it will reduce the amount of tyre surface on the road.

You need SOME negative camber to compensate when turning in order for more tyre to touch the road surface.

Sorry if I explained it bad, maybe someone else can do a better job.

Ultimately, the choice is yours. If you put in positive camber at the rear wheels, you're going to be oversteering if you're giving it around corners and stuff.

However, in the straight line, it will be better.

but when you lower a skyline the negative camber increases, so you need to dial in positive camber to counter this. you still retain negative camber overall, but less than you would have without adjusting it...

this does not mean your wheels are instantly going to be flat, but if you dont do this you will not be getting traction on a lowered car.

if you want to get your power to the ground on a low skyline then this is a must...

I've decided I'll go drifteks simply because they have a good deal going at the moment and because they aren't expensive I wouldn't mind if it gets banged up a lil - gutters rocks etc. And I think I'll go 17s as well but the only decent 17" sizes are gtr offset 17x9.5 +18 all round, I could always mix and match like 17x8 +34 front and 17x9.5 +18 rear, I don't know how it will look though as the offsets are very far apart. But if I can fit 17x9.5s at the front I will. Q: with some guard work is it worth attempting to fit them? Or should I mix and match ? 17x8 fronts and 17x9.5 rears or even 17x9 fronts and 17x9.5 rears, the rears will need a bit of work obviously but how about the fronts?

for reference i run:

235/40/18's and

5/7kg coilovers

positive camber a few deg, but cant remmeber exactly

car is 10mm lower than in that pic now (320mm centre to guard)

i can just 1 finger up to the second knuckle between the guard and tyre

car also has swaybars and strutbraces front and rear

guards are rolled but not flared - paint did not crack

i do not get any scrubbing to worry about, a tiny bit of black on my finger if i run it around the guards, and only if its been driven hard

the 73 hub should be aight.... from memory mine are 76mm and i had custom hub locators made up, but most people that run professors dont bother...

Look what you wrote above i.e. You run positive camber. I interpreted this exactly the way it's written.

You didn't say you dialed in more positive camber to offset the excessive negative camber, however, overall, you still retain a little bit of negative camber.

not hugely as my coilovers probably wont do so well without them...

prolly a 10mm is under i'd say, i'd go lower cause i'm very fashionable, but its just not practical (well neither is the height i already run, but its easily livable)

I've decided I'll go drifteks simply because they have a good deal going at the moment and because they aren't expensive I wouldn't mind if it gets banged up a lil - gutters rocks etc. And I think I'll go 17s as well but the only decent 17" sizes are gtr offset 17x9.5 +18 all round, I could always mix and match like 17x8 +34 front and 17x9.5 +18 rear, I don't know how it will look though as the offsets are very far apart. But if I can fit 17x9.5s at the front I will. Q: with some guard work is it worth attempting to fit them? Or should I mix and match ? 17x8 fronts and 17x9.5 rears or even 17x9 fronts and 17x9.5 rears, the rears will need a bit of work obviously but how about the fronts?

the 9.5 + 18's do fit on the front guards of a 33but are REAL far out...

and the 8" are not far enough....

what is the offset of the 17x9" ?

Wait a second just thinking about it, shouldn't the 17x9 +34 front and 17x9.5 +18 rears fit without a problem, car hasn't been lowered at all, according to the offset calc it will stick out only 13mm more at the front and 16mm more at the rear, so only the rears may need a lip/roll and when the car gets coilovers and a better ride height then the fronts will need a lip/roll.

Any thoughts? Corrections? Suggestions?

Thanks for all the help dude

Edited by DaGr81

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...