Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well it made more power than a stock 350z, but not with a bad issue....

my car seems to be leaning out at the lower and higher rpm. the midrange seems to be ok. i will try scan the dyno graph. 1st run made 162kw 2nd run made 158kw but leaning out even worse than before.

what could be the cause of this? the dyno tuner said that most possibly the fuel pump may be on the way out.

i have recently just installed the plenum spacer, the cf intake and the grounding kit. i did an ecu reset as well.

what else could contribute to very bad AFR? an air leak somewhere?

-mark

well it made more power than a stock 350z, but not with a bad issue....

my car seems to be leaning out at the lower and higher rpm. the midrange seems to be ok. i will try scan the dyno graph. 1st run made 162kw 2nd run made 158kw but leaning out even worse than before.

what could be the cause of this? the dyno tuner said that most possibly the fuel pump may be on the way out.

i have recently just installed the plenum spacer, the cf intake and the grounding kit. i did an ecu reset as well.

what else could contribute to very bad AFR? an air leak somewhere?

-mark

Make sure your plemun blots are tight and use some lock tight on them. Double check your intake for leaks. Even if you reset your ECU give your car some time to adjust to your mods. A few hours running time and not just idle but go drag some XR6's and a few SS's :teehee: . But if you have had your mods for a few weeks then there sould be no problems with ECU.

Hrmm yeah check round the intake and make sure nothing is pinching from the plenum spacer installation (eg. the oil fill rubber grommet/neck thing).

But you said it felt faster than before install ?

My car runs a tad (13's) lean as well. I'll try and scan sometime if you want but overall it's quite good.

yeh i did use the loctite on the bolts and the plenum spacer install seems to be A-Ok. all tourqed up to specific settings.

The thing is i dont think the pelnum spacer will cause a problem with AFR as the air is being sucked in, not let out hence the pressure is the othere way

yes when i did the install i made sure the oil filler thing is not pinching when i installed it.

Have you changed you PCV on the right bank of the motor.

I have been told that these are ofter replaced on the V35. The service manual recommends at each major service which on these would be around the 80k mark.

If it is clogged up or faulty it can be letting in air into the manifold after the butterfly.

Cheers

Andy

Good news, glad to see nothing is wrong with the car! How'd you determine the car was fine ?

Do you know who did the dyno run at ISMR? I've been there for a few years and never had any issues, including dyno runs.. not much required for a power run, just set the parameters, then floor it!

The first time my V went on IS' dyno, it only posted 130kw atw.. it's fixed now though :thumbsup:

have u got the dyno graph for that?

here is my graphs:

Old - car stock:

V35%20Dyno.jpg

Recent - after mods:

3710641540_61b5045045.jpg

and this is what the guys over on the us forums had to say:

OK, what ever that is, its not real. There is no way your car would run at that AFR. Its way too high and way too erratic.

What ever it is, its not your car. It would run like complete garbage (or not at all) if it truely was at 19+

At this point I'm thinking it was the dyno AF sensor or something similar in nature.

and ideas guys? also on the first run it made 162.8rwkw though..... the 2nd run made even less????

Edited by BLISTC

o.0 !!

Omg what on earth..

Yeah what the US guys said, if your AFR was really up there, you should be pinging and the motor probably would've said byebye awhile ago. Maybe it is the AFR sensor on the dyno like you said. However, did you check to see if any of the cars run after you had ok AFR readouts ? That should give you some clues..

Your stock afr readout is about right. Pretty much the same mapping my car is running but with the mods in my list (just simple breather stuff).

Even with everything you've heard/read from forums and mechs...if my car was posting an AFR like that...i'd take it to another dyno just to make sure everything was actually ok. GL.

hey mark

it's daniel here with the blue 350z at the ISMR day.

the reading is due to the sensor they place in the exhaust not being placed in all the way, hence the strange AFR readings. It was happening with quite a few cars and on a few occasions i saw them remove the sensor and Indy himself placed it back in to get a proper reading. Dyno KW readout itself however shouldn't be affected by that. The ISMR dyno is renowned for reading a fair bit lower than other dynos around, and i wouldnt really bother comparing graphs from other places together!

Edited by danielb

hey daniel

thanks for the heads up

thats good to know because i got the fuel pump checked out today and the fuel filter and it is all in pristine condition.

its all working fine which is a relief. yeh considering your car is stock and mine isnt, and made a few extra kw with the mods installed it is about right. i heard people say the ISMR dyno was reading up to 20KW lower than what it used to read.

Glad you got to the bottom of it all. Yeah ISMR's dyno is a conservative reader.

Interesting on their afr sensor not working properly..i only dyno'd there not long before the dyno day you guys went to but my afr readout seems to be ok. On the printout below, you can see my 130kw run and my after run.

gallery_56118_3384_23685.jpg

130 was when i first bought the car and it had a problem. 170 was only a few weeks ago. Indy simply printed an older run on the recent printout for comparison. As you can see, the afr's are quite decent i think.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Got started on the modification to make these splash plates fit over the long weekend. First the surprisingly time consuming task of swapping all the cam camp bolts to Tomei cam cap studs. I did the method of removing one bolt at a time, applying loctite to the stud, double nutting to torque as the manual described. Then carefully unlocking the nuts without disrupting the torque of the stud (and going back to re-torque a few times when it slipped). Finally applying the nut and torquing to spec. Repeat x28 Next up I went about removing the stock cam cover baffle so I could ensure it was fully clean after drilling for stud clearance.  As the blind rivets holding the baffle on were domed I used a punch to mark the center then used 4mm drill bit to carefully drill out the rivet without going too far part the baffle. As seen in other thread here is what is inside the stock baffles I decided on M4x6mm bolts to bolt the baffle plate back on with. I used a 3.3mm drill bit with some tape to mark the depth at ~8mm. Next was to tap the threads using a cheap bunnings kit M4x0.7. With the baffle removed I also drilled out the spot welds holding in the baffle plate oil returns. Unsure whether this was the best option or if I should have cut holes in the Hypertune splash plates to allow the oil drains to still function... time will tell. I then removed the the Hypertune splash plates so I could rest the cam cover on top and use a dab of grease to mark where the studs impacted the oem cam cover baffle. The most obvious spot was on the hump from the stock mesh is held. Using this hole as an anchor I bolted the oem baffle plate back into the cam cover and lined up the Hypertune splash plate. Marked the rest of the holes for the studs and drill those out too. Total 32 holes drilled and 12 threads tapped on the passenger side cam cover alone for this bolt on part that totally clears all OEM cam covers.. Drivers side next as well as some E85 safe fuel foam to fill the space behind the behind cam cover baffle plates. oh and some lock nuts for the splash plates of course.
    • I had the same previously, and it really shits me. They just run off red book averages or whatever as the maximum insured, there are never good quality cars available to buy for anywhere near those prices. I don't even understand why they do it. Sure having a customer overinsure then false claim is a risk, but how often does that really happen in the world, 1%? 0.1%? On the other hand, all 10-20% above redbook listed prices and charge 10-20% higher premium, surely that is more profitable for those cockroaches
    • My take on gg2 48mm, 54mm, 58mm, and 62mm compressor map for same size compressor vs gg1 : All gg2 only outflow gg1 above 20 psi. As all g gen 2 surge line at lower left of comp map move to the right, all gg2 sacrifice spool vs same size gg1, surge line move to the right worst for 54mm gg2. So for same size compressor if you want best response, use gg1, if you want max hp at >20psi use gg2 but you will be laggier vs same size gg1. Max compressor efficiency drops to max 75% on all gg2 vs max 76%-80% of same size gg1. Iirc lower efficiency means hotter iat less dense air so lower hp at same operating point of comp map. Also curious why gg2 is mapped to lower max rpm vs same size gg1 (only 48mm size both gg1 gg2 mapped to same rpm) : 54mm gg1 165,000 rpm  vs  gg2 160,000 rpm. 58mm gg1 150,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000rpm. 62mm gg1 145,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000 rpm. If gg2 can safely spin to gg1 rpm then they can flow a bit more than as mapped. Good thing that all gg 2 interchange compressor and turbine housings with same size gg 1. So gg1 owners can buy gg2 chra only if planning to boost >20psi.
    • My stuff is all with Shannon's, granted, I don't really have imports I'm driving on the road, however, I've had multiple cars at the same time with them. Presently we have the Landcruiser on laid up cover, Sarah's Kluger on full cover, and the house insured. About 18 months ago Sarah wrote her Subaru Liberty GTB off, insured with Shannon's, and the payout, and buy back of the wreck was super quick. In 2020 we had the VF Commodore totalled in a major hailstorm. Storm was on the Saturday, I called on the Sunday and lodged it, vehicle was towed on Tuesday night, assessment team called on Wednesday to say it was a total loss and get payout details, money was in the bank on Thursday morning. Have had a few other claims both at fault, and not at fault, over the years, and never had an issue with them.   Funnily enough, they're also the cheapest insurer I find for things like Sarah's Kluger.   I will say I'm less impressed dealing with them lately around "the experience", as a lot of their staff that you deal with aren't car enthusiasts. Shannon's has a much more main stream feel ever since they decided to become "big corporate", laid a heap of staff off, and then hired a bunch of non enthusiasts. At the same time they've been making a push to be less "call us and we'll personally have someone who cares help" to "hey, this computer can do stuff for you" and are trying to get more square pegs to fit round holes. (That's just the vibe I get from them). Again, have had no issues with claims with them, but get a bit of a "less personal" feel from them.
    • A thing I wasn’t happy with with enthusiast was during the initial phone call they told me they’d insure it for 130k but needed photos.   I then sent them photos and they told me $80k as there were other cars either similar modifications available for around that price, I told them to send me the links to said cars so that I can buy them. i then sent the modification list with prices of the parts (no labor) and the price then came to 115k, which is still shy of the 130 that was agreed in the initial phone call 
×
×
  • Create New...