Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Picked my car up from ben at racepace yesterday after getting a tune done. Took it for a drive tonight and twice under load at mid-high rpm the car sounded like it was missing (didn't sound like detonation.) Had a look at my power fc and the first time the knock was at 34 and second time 46. Are they dangerously high levels? :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/274573-knock-question/
Share on other sites

Im surprised, usually with the stock default map they detonate out of th ebox. I wouldnt lean on it too hard without a tune. Remember a stock setup detonating can crack a piston easier than a 350rwkw well tuned setup.

im suprised too, it runs so much smoother than the stock computer just plugging it straight in.

i dont want to spend 500+ on a tune, then in 2 months time upgrade the turbo etc which im planning to do and then have to spend the same again to get it tuned again

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/274573-knock-question/#findComment-4655551
Share on other sites

im suprised too, it runs so much smoother than the stock computer just plugging it straight in.

i dont want to spend 500+ on a tune, then in 2 months time upgrade the turbo etc which im planning to do and then have to spend the same again to get it tuned again

I read an article on stock pfc maps for an s15 and they were very aggressive; i would assume that would be the same for most jdm imports too. You would feel more power but its probably running lean, a little too lean.

in regards to knock, I see 14 on cold nights at higher throttle but can see 34 or so on a hot day.........want to add, was cruising on a rough road at 80km/h, pushed the clutch in and let the car coast while i reset the handcontroller and monitored the knocks and it still registered about 25 so it would be plausible to assume that roadnoise can influence knock to some degree.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/274573-knock-question/#findComment-4656149
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
    • As I said, there's trade offs to jamming EVERYTHING in. Timing, resources etc, being the huge ones. Calling out the factory ECU has nothing to do with it, as it doesn't do any form of fancy boost control. It's all open loop boost control. You mention the Haltech Nexus, that's effectively two separate devices jammed into one box. What you quote about it, is proof for that. So now you've lost flexibility as a product too...   A product designed to do one thing really well, will always beat other products doing multiple things. Also, I wouldn't knock COTS stuff, you'd be surprised how many things are using it, that you're probably totally in love with As for the SpaceX comment that we're working directly with them, it's about the type of stuff we're doing. We're doing design work, and breaking world firsts. If you can't understand that I have real world hands on experience, including in very modern tech, and actually understand this stuff, then to avoid useless debates where you just won't accept fact and experience, from here on, it seems you'd be be happy I (and possibly anyone with knowledge really) not reply to your questions, or input, no matter how much help you could be given to help you, or let you learn. It seems you're happy reading your data sheets, factory service manuals, and only want people to reinforce your thoughts and points of view. 
    • I don't really understand because clearly it's possible. The factory ECU is running on like a 4 MHz 16-bit processor. Modern GDI ECUs have like 200 MHz superscalar cores with floating point units too. The Haltech Nexus has two 240 MHz CPU cores. The Elite 2500 is a single 80 MHz core. Surely 20x the compute means adding some PID boost control logic isn't that complicated. I'm not saying clock speed is everything, but the requirements to add boost control to a port injection 6 cylinder ECU are really not that difficult. More I/O, more interrupt handlers, more working memory, etc isn't that crazy to figure out. SpaceX if anything shows just how far you can get arguably doing things the "wrong" way, ie x86 COTS running C++ on Linux. That is about as far away from the "correct" architecture as it gets for a real time system, but it works anyways. 
    • Holy hell! That is absolutely stunning! Great work!!!
×
×
  • Create New...