Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I have a ps3 n xbox360 and as most games come on both consoles i jst wanna know which one should i opt for? So far most games ive bought are on ps3 cos of the bluray compatibility or am i going about it wrong?

Which is a better console related to processing speed/graphics etc

thanks

-Johnny

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/275579-buy-games-for-xbox360-or-ps3/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

They are virtually identical in power/graphics.

Do some research as you will find most answers you get with questions like these are not based on evidence. Of course someone who owns only one system will state the system they have is the only choice. Just like the above poster.

The ps3 i think has a faster processor

The 360 has a better graphics processor

The majority of games on both the 360 and ps3 look and play better on the 360.

I have both systems and when i have the option to by a game for either system i always go for the 360. The controller suits me better and it plays and looks better. However for fighting games where you use the dpad i would choose the ps3 as i dont like the dpad on the 360.

Edited by Pattygtst

Well I would say PS3 for the pure fact that they reigon free. You can buy a game from overseas and be about $20-$30 cheaper (inc. delivery) where as the Xbox360 is region locked so you can't get some games (MLB 2K9 I really want on X360 but it's not coming out to Australia and it's reigoned locked to the US)

The Graphics on both systems are marginlly the same - some has better qualities than the other.

I have ps3/360/wii. Obviously the wii is only party games and stuff so I dont really bother with that for console games.

When I go to buy a game that's on both consoles, I consider who I am going to play the online stuff with, so depending on what style of game and what console those friends have. I dont really consider the graphics etc, as previously said, it's not that different over both consoles.

if there is heaps of online stuff I tend to go for the 360 cos I think xbox live is a fair bit better than the the online psn network.

They are virtually identical in power/graphics.

Do some research as you will find most answers you get with questions like these are not based on evidence. Of course someone who owns only one system will state the system they have is the only choice. Just like the above poster.

The ps3 i think has a faster processor

The 360 has a better graphics processor

The majority of games on both the 360 and ps3 look and play better on the 360.

I have both systems and when i have the option to by a game for either system i always go for the 360. The controller suits me better and it plays and looks better. However for fighting games where you use the dpad i would choose the ps3 as i dont like the dpad on the 360.

:P

Technically, two - PS3 and PC.

I had an Xbox 360 but didnt find it worthwhile keeping - only thing that kept me playing it was Forza 2, everything else I could play on the PS3 or the PC. I also had a Wii for a short period of time because my girlfriend wanted it, eventually sold it as it didnt offer much games that interest me and she only wanted it to play Mario Kart Wii.

Best mate has both PS3 and 360, tbh I'm glad he bought both because I like playing the exclusive games like Resistance. I wouldn't buy one myself though. BTW Activision is looking at withdrawing support for PS3 as of next year.

I reckon they're bluffing, although their sales on the PS3 are fairly poor - but then again, the only descent game they have is COD... which will be better on PC than any console anyway.

Guitar Queero is (for now) still selling truckloads of copies, plus the upcoming dj hero and tony hawks games among others.

After playing the PS3 and 360 a fair bit, I can't see anything about the PS3 that makes it better - when you put a new game in it decides to take 10 minutes dumping random files on the hard disk, the games are still in standard definition, there are no rumble packs in the controllers (not to mention siaxxis was a complete flop), and the controllers aren't as nice feeling as the 360.

Dunno about you, but I know 2 people who have a PS3 - everyone else has 360's!

The multiplayer on Xbox live also canes anything PS has to offer.

The main problem with the 360 is the propensity for the 3 red rings of death due to the shitty cooling system, but if you're the first purchaser and have resisted the urge to open it up for whatever reason, you can get it repaired free of charge.

PS3 runs 7 nvidia 512 cards and the xbox runs 5 512 ATI cards.

PS controller is tryed and proven and in my opinion the best controller shape and feel you can get, i never really liked the xpox controllers.

most if not all xbox games are on PC anyways (got one of those)

6 axiss is great for the right games, and all the new PS3 boxes come with dual shock controllers (ive still got the old non shock, battery lasts longer that way)

most peeps buy the xbox cause its cheaper, and for the online support, which is fair enough, but PSN is free unlike Xbox live.

and the MAIN reason behind buying a PS3 for me (other than the fact it was a Bday present from the missus) is the GT games, and killzone 2, greatest games ever :blink:

dude resistance 2 is like Gears of War for PS3, I've played a fair bit of it, and it was dissapoint.

I've only played the one game with Siaxxis, The Godfather, and it was more annoying than useful.

Most gamers I know would spend as much as it cost to get the premium gaming console, I was initially a fan of the PS3, but after seeing how good the Xbox games looked on a high definition TV, I was sold on it. You would also think that with something like 25GB a disc that there would be more content in the games as well.

Beer Baron, I don't know where you got your PS3 from, but all those I've played have come out with non rumble controllers?

Edited by bozodos

yeah my launch came with non rumble controller but they have been available to buy for ages now, and for the last year or so they ship with them too. I have 2 rumble ones and one original non rumble one from launch. :thumbsup:

They are exactly the same. You wont even notice a difference graphics wise. Games amde for ps3 and then ported to 360 will look a fraction better and vice versa (you wont even notice the difference.) The ps3 downloads files to the HDD so it reduces load times.

What is this about xbox live being better? Because you have to pay for it you want to believe your money is being well spent? Stop being a fanboy

edit: also don't forget some sites compare the ps3 to xbox graphics using the ps3's composite cable which is NOT hd

Edited by topher_

PS3 and xbox dont look the same, theres something so slightly different about the way they look, dunno what it is, but ive never liked the xbox, or 360's picture that much.

and yes $90 -$100 for a PS3 controller is a violation, id rather not rumble for that price. btw PS2 controllers work for most games in the PS3 as long as you have a USB adaptor from USB to PS2 (awesome adaptor to have, costs 4 bucks, and then you can use the PS controller on games like TMN, GRID, Dirt, and all those other awesome PC driving games)

yeah the price of dual shock controllers here is rude. I bought some in japan about 2 years ago and they were about $45-$50 which seemed about right.

but all PS3s do ship with them standard now and have done for quite a while.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey, it's a GT-R, it's just as significant a moment as mine😁 It's not ideal when things are uncertain; I'm the type of person that always has a set plan for things in life so being unsure of this plan puts me in a weird place mentally.
    • Hows your intake piping? Are you still running stock? Having in the stock AFM position would mean, if the BOV was shut/venting out, it'd create the almost stalling kind of effect right // "the rich pulse behaviour" due to MAF thinking air is flowing ? But this would be better than having the bov in the stock position + MAF on/just before cross over piping right?
    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card style AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had no flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
×
×
  • Create New...