Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone,

i still have a few parts lying around which i need gone this WEEK. Have had lots of interest, however alot of tyre-kickers also.

So, i am setting some new prices, which are ridiculously cheap for some items. Prices are FIRM, as i bleive that they are cheap enough already

RB25 LONG MOTOR (170,XXX KM.S)

COMES WITH ALL STOCK PARTS MINUS TURBO, ENGINE NEVER SAW MORE THAN 14PSI OF BOOST, PUSHED OUT A HEALTHY 250RWKW NEVER HAD A PBORLEM WITH IT

$1500 PICK UP MELBOURNE

APEXI POWER FC NO H/C FOR RB25 $900 PICK UP

TEIN HR COILOVERS R32 GTS-T HEIGHT ADJ W/C-SPANNERS $600

LEATHER RECARO SEATS FROM EVO 9 MR WITH RAILS FOR R33 - MINT CONDITION $3000 PAIR W/RAILS

SPATS FRONT STRUT BRACE $60

CUSCO STYLE REAR STRUT BRACE $50

HEADLIGHTS (RE-CO'D BRANDE NEW GLOBES, WIRING, SEALS) $200 PICK UP

RETURN FLOW INTERCOOLER W/CUSTOM STAINLESS STEEL PIPING $350

TRUST CAT BACK EXHAUST SYSTEM (12 MTHS OLD) $350

3" FRONT PIPE RB20/25 $100

SPLIT DUMP PIPE $70

PLENTY OF OTHER PARTS AVAILABLE, PM ME WITH YOUR EMAIL DETAILS AND I WILL SEND PICS THRU.

ALL REASONABLE OFFERS CONSIDERED, NEED THESE PARTS GONE

just letting everyone know that apart from the RB25 engine and engine related parts, all parts are for an R32 GTST

PM's replied, emails sent where possible :down:

Dump, front & decat pipe has been SOLD to R33 GTST Sereis 1 - top bloke mate, let me know how it goes fter install :D

Headlights sold pending pick up tmrw

MAKE ME AN REASONABLE OFFER GUYS!!!!!!!!!!

hey guys, must did a bit of shopping around on various interweb sites and it looks like i have the CHEAPEST RB25 ENGINE FOR SALE @ $1500 FOR A COMPLETE STOCK MOTOR MINUS TURBO.

SOMEONE SHOULD SNATCH THIS UP IT IS AN ABSOLUTE BARGAIN PRICE!!!!!!!!!!!

will give u 700 for the motor with no turbo no looms no harness no coilpacks

hey mate,

700 is peanuts for a healthy motor, even without turbo and all that other stuff.

I'll measure the cooler up tmrw and post pictures for everyone to see.

Have replied to all PMs, and anyone requesting pictures of the cooler or TEINS let me know i will be sending those pics out tmrw afternoon

Thank you everyone

Alitan - i'm quite firm on getting $1500 for the motor as it is i believe that is cheap enough already. At this stage i'm not willing to take any further parts off it.

Ash - i have already told ppl that i am including the c-spanners in the coilover package , if this changes i will lete u know.

Everyone waiting on pics of the cooler and coilovers, i wont be able to get them to you guys tonight as due to work i was unable to obtain pics of them before the wrecking yard that my car in sitting shut, so i will have to get them to everyone tmrw.

Thanks everyone for their patience, i have been completely inundated with requests and am doing my best to get back to you all in a timely fashion

Thanks again

Nzm

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
    • As I said, there's trade offs to jamming EVERYTHING in. Timing, resources etc, being the huge ones. Calling out the factory ECU has nothing to do with it, as it doesn't do any form of fancy boost control. It's all open loop boost control. You mention the Haltech Nexus, that's effectively two separate devices jammed into one box. What you quote about it, is proof for that. So now you've lost flexibility as a product too...   A product designed to do one thing really well, will always beat other products doing multiple things. Also, I wouldn't knock COTS stuff, you'd be surprised how many things are using it, that you're probably totally in love with As for the SpaceX comment that we're working directly with them, it's about the type of stuff we're doing. We're doing design work, and breaking world firsts. If you can't understand that I have real world hands on experience, including in very modern tech, and actually understand this stuff, then to avoid useless debates where you just won't accept fact and experience, from here on, it seems you'd be be happy I (and possibly anyone with knowledge really) not reply to your questions, or input, no matter how much help you could be given to help you, or let you learn. It seems you're happy reading your data sheets, factory service manuals, and only want people to reinforce your thoughts and points of view. 
    • I don't really understand because clearly it's possible. The factory ECU is running on like a 4 MHz 16-bit processor. Modern GDI ECUs have like 200 MHz superscalar cores with floating point units too. The Haltech Nexus has two 240 MHz CPU cores. The Elite 2500 is a single 80 MHz core. Surely 20x the compute means adding some PID boost control logic isn't that complicated. I'm not saying clock speed is everything, but the requirements to add boost control to a port injection 6 cylinder ECU are really not that difficult. More I/O, more interrupt handlers, more working memory, etc isn't that crazy to figure out. SpaceX if anything shows just how far you can get arguably doing things the "wrong" way, ie x86 COTS running C++ on Linux. That is about as far away from the "correct" architecture as it gets for a real time system, but it works anyways. 
×
×
  • Create New...