Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Don't know what lens I should get..

I want to spend between $1-2k

I would like some thing that takes really good shots in low light or at night.

or

Some thing that is really good for landscape

or

some sort of fish eye..

any suggestions?

(for canon 40D)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276351-new-lens/
Share on other sites

I would like some thing that takes really good shots in low light or at night.

Canon 50mm f1.4 PLUS canon 85 mm f1.8 :D

OR canon 17-55 f2.8

Some thing that is really good for landscape

canon 10-22mm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Or even my sigma does quite well.. sigma 17-70mm

Or how about the canon 17-40L f4

some sort of fish eye

Just remember you wont get the full effect from a fish eye lens due to a 1.6x crop factor.

Best bet is to go full frame..

Dont bother looking into the canon 15mm fish eye.. you will be disappointed on your 40d.

Get either the sigma 8mm or sigma 10mm (however im not to sure the price on these two lens)

Everything else i have listed is between 1-2k :thumbsup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276351-new-lens/#findComment-4679067
Share on other sites

Landscapes – 10-22mm or the Sigma 10-20. Both have comparable IQ and around the same price. If you can afford and want too, I suggest getting the Tokina 12-24. This has a little bit better IQ than the lenses above, but is a little more pricey. Also, depends on how you take landscape shots, whether you just aim, focus and fire away, or you use Hyperfocal Distancing for sharpness front to back.

General Purpose use – Canon 17-55 2.8. For a crop camera, this is the best lens you can get. Pretty much equivalent to the 24-70L. IQ is comparable, sharpness corner to corner, no softness at all! I had a copy, they are great. Just be wary, that the build quality is not that great, the IS is a bit noisy and it is known to gather a lot of dust if not well treated. Has glass which is L standards.

Lens you must own – 70-200 2.8 IS. No doubt about it. Fantastic lens. People often complain that they don’t like the bulk or it is too heavy, but personally I find it is a perfect lens. Great for low light shots, great for portrait/candid shots, you can use a 1.4x TC as well as a 2x TC and still AF (f/5.6 with the 2x) although IQ drops with the 2x TC. This is a need for any photographers bag. Although this usually fetches for ~$2K used, you will not be disappointed. Otherwise, a f/4 IS (Sharpest zoom lens in canon’s line-up).

Fisheye – Don’t even bother, wait until you go full frame. Otherwise, maybe just buy a 10-20 or 10-22 and just use it at 10mm if it will be sufficient enough. Have you ever used a lens at 10mm? It is wiiiiddee.

Low light photography – Depends how low light you mean. Can you take a tripod for long exposures?? The DOF at 1.2-1.4 is razor thin and EXTREMELY hard to keep in focus and get the right DOF. This takes practice. I think the 85 1.8 is an extremely good lens, but on a crop camera this is quite a long lens. I would suggest Sigma 30 1.4. Great lens.

They are my recommendation for your 40D :O

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276351-new-lens/#findComment-4680331
Share on other sites

Canon 50mm f1.4 PLUS canon 85 mm f1.8 :(

OR canon 17-55 f2.8

canon 10-22mm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Or even my sigma does quite well.. sigma 17-70mm

Or how about the canon 17-40L f4

Just remember you wont get the full effect from a fish eye lens due to a 1.6x crop factor.

Best bet is to go full frame..

Dont bother looking into the canon 15mm fish eye.. you will be disappointed on your 40d.

Get either the sigma 8mm or sigma 10mm (however im not to sure the price on these two lens)

Everything else i have listed is between 1-2k :bunny:

thanks sidd

$800, it includes the lens petal and canon soft case. No box as I discarded it when I moved house. Lens is in perfect, mint condition with no marks or imperfections.

cool, ill keep it in mind.

Landscapes – 10-22mm or the Sigma 10-20. Both have comparable IQ and around the same price. If you can afford and want too, I suggest getting the Tokina 12-24. This has a little bit better IQ than the lenses above, but is a little more pricey. Also, depends on how you take landscape shots, whether you just aim, focus and fire away, or you use Hyperfocal Distancing for sharpness front to back.

General Purpose use – Canon 17-55 2.8. For a crop camera, this is the best lens you can get. Pretty much equivalent to the 24-70L. IQ is comparable, sharpness corner to corner, no softness at all! I had a copy, they are great. Just be wary, that the build quality is not that great, the IS is a bit noisy and it is known to gather a lot of dust if not well treated. Has glass which is L standards.

Lens you must own – 70-200 2.8 IS. No doubt about it. Fantastic lens. People often complain that they don’t like the bulk or it is too heavy, but personally I find it is a perfect lens. Great for low light shots, great for portrait/candid shots, you can use a 1.4x TC as well as a 2x TC and still AF (f/5.6 with the 2x) although IQ drops with the 2x TC. This is a need for any photographers bag. Although this usually fetches for ~$2K used, you will not be disappointed. Otherwise, a f/4 IS (Sharpest zoom lens in canon’s line-up).

Fisheye – Don’t even bother, wait until you go full frame. Otherwise, maybe just buy a 10-20 or 10-22 and just use it at 10mm if it will be sufficient enough. Have you ever used a lens at 10mm? It is wiiiiddee.

Low light photography – Depends how low light you mean. Can you take a tripod for long exposures?? The DOF at 1.2-1.4 is razor thin and EXTREMELY hard to keep in focus and get the right DOF. This takes practice. I think the 85 1.8 is an extremely good lens, but on a crop camera this is quite a long lens. I would suggest Sigma 30 1.4. Great lens.

They are my recommendation for your 40D :D

Cheers for that :O

I think I have a bit to think about now :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276351-new-lens/#findComment-4680364
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • We are literally just kids stuck in an adult's body with bills and mortgages to pay 🥲
    • Behrman is great quality stuff. My 34 has some serious clouding as well but I’m too nervous to try and replace the glass myself so I haven’t bought them yet. 
    • This might be true if you live in NZ but I can't see how this could be true for us locals here.  I've found the customer support for Haltech to be absolutely amazing. I've turned up to Haltech and spent entire days with their tech support guys, they've even helped me with wiring dramas that had nothing to do with their products.  They have the best customer support of any company I've dealt with, I can't imagine how my experiences with them could possibly be any better.
    • If you want to do a single throttle body conversion easily, you won't need to pull anything apart. Take the linkage from your throttle off the linkage controlling the ITBs. Now open the ITBs wide open, and lock the linkages in said position. Now add a single throttle body onto the front of your inlet plenum. No it's not ideal for the last nth of a kw, but it'll be a lot better than what you're already trying to do...   PS, ITBs can be so damn hard to tune from, because roughly 20% movement in a throttle body equates to a change in roughly 80% of its flow (Hence power). When you add up the flow limitations of those small throttle bodys, it is a LOT higher than that of a single large throttle. Hence, TPS is very very sensitive with them, and you do a LOT of work with sensor fusion, and some Maths behind the scenes to make those blends nice, and be smooth.
    • Yep, when Haltech purchased Adaptronic, and all of the Adaptronic staff, including Andy went with it, it took Haltech to the next level. Haltech wanted Adaptronic as they wanted things like Andy's fuel models, and some other IP, AND they wanted Andy too as he is brilliant! Andy has spoken about the incompatibilities between the old 1500 stuff vs Nexxus, and it totally makes sense. It's not JUST software that is different, there is huge changes in the underlying hardware too. It's why Haltech has had soooo many changes in the last couple of years, in terms of Hardware, and Software, and why it has become so damn Amazing. Why do you think guys like Rob Dahm with his quad rotor, went from running Adaptronic's to running Haltechs? Andy. Pretty much, Haltech these days, is Adaptronic, but with more funds behind it, and more staff, and hence Andy's visions, and visions of other people that he helps shape their great visions, into amazing new products. All the new Nexxus gear, whole new software for it, new and better dashboards, the apps that will run on headunits and NOT be slow to respond! I understand people being burnt in the past, but if you're ragging on a company, about products and issues from many years ago, it's more a reflection on yourself, not looking or keeping up with new stuff. In which case, those people should be going back to PowerFC and Nistunes as the ECU's to rave on about...
×
×
  • Create New...