Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

G-Day all, I've been looking a few Series II R33's and some R34's. I know a fair bit about the R33, but not that much about the R34's, can someone help me out here?

How do the 2 compare? And what sort of price range should a good R34 GT-T manual be?

All opinions appreciated, thanks,

Crazy.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2766-price-indication-on-r34-please/
Share on other sites

Hey Guys,

On the same note, does anyone know of any Sydney dealers with R34's at a decent price. I'm after a dealer as I don't want the hassle of selling my 33 privately. and would prefer to try and trade it in.

PS Sorry George, I think the convertable Stang will have to wait. probably when I go thrugh my mid-life crisis.

:P

Thanks

Bobby

meggalla, gotta disagree about resale value of the r34.

A 98 model now worth about 40k, will probably only get you about 25k in 2 years time.

just think about the r33's.. when they were around 4 years old (1994 in 1998) they sold for over 40k... now, the same car, you wont be able to get 20k for..

i disagree Pete,

try going to a dealer and asking 40k for a GTT? you'll find they are selling them closer to 50-55k and powerplayimports.com have "SWOOP" forsale at 75k! high hopes but its immaculate.

2 things which i believe will hold the value of R34's in particular, the second one not so particular to an R34:

1. the R34 will most likely be the last skyline with the RB engine and its arguably the best ever made.

2. stricter grey import laws in australia will certainly make it alot harder for imports to make it to our shores. So a certain demand vs supply will automatically hold their value up (with all imports in general).

thats my 2c anyways...

Back to Crazy's question...its all about preference, i know lots of ppl who love the R33 shape and lots who love the R34's shape. In terms of exterior and interior they are worlds apart. In terms of engine performance, there is a fair amount of differences.

* same engine but R34 has NEO equivalent

* R34 makes 48Nm more torque, 1200rpm's lower than the R33

* R34 runs 0.7bar boost, a little higher than the R33

* R34 peak power has risen to 206kw @ 6400rpm

these were possible through changes in engine management system, cam timing and turbo system.

There is a dearler here trying to sell 2 for 50odd, and these are brand new, about 5k on the clock on they have been there for a couple of years.

Generally the sell for 40 in the yards, my old man has one he got 12months ago for 40. Some sell privately for under 40k.

They will probably drop to low 30s in a couple of years i think.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
    • 95 is just a scam outright. 98 is the real "premium" with all the best detergents and other additive packages, and at least historically, used to be more dense also. 95 is just 91 bargain basement shit with a little extra octane rating. Of course, there's 91 and there's 91 also. I always (back in the 90s early 2000s) refused to put fuel in from supermarket related fuel chains on the basis that it was nasty half arsed shit imported from Indonesia. Nowadays, I suspect that there is little difference between the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the "bargain" chains and the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the big brands, given that most of it is coming from the same SEAsian refineries. Anyway - if there's still anything to that logic, then it would apply to 95 also. 98 is only made in decent refineries and, as I said, is usually the "premium" fuel, both in terms of octane rating and "use this because it's good for your engine because it's got the unicorn jizz in it!".
    • Yeah since those first 2 replies I actually went and put some 98 in it and tbf it's already doing much better than the 95 (which is weird and makes my inner tinfoil hat wearer think the 95 was a crap batch), getting 8ish around town. Again, wonder if it takes a while to stabilize if the fuel is changed a couple of times. I swear cars used to just either run "well" or "s**t* in my 20s, none of this fuel optimisation business haha 
×
×
  • Create New...