Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

No I did not. I haven't touched any springs/shocks on my car since it arrived from Japan.

Aren't coupe always a little bit lower than sedans?

going from 245/45R18 to 275/35R19 does reduce the diameter by about 2.5mm which is not really much, and reduce the rolling diameter by about 8 mm only.

maybe the car had 350Z spring or a lowered spring, but the ride felt stock - no sign of aftermarket spring feel when it was on its OEM 18" a while ago. On 19" with lower profile it does introduce a bit more harshness because of the smaller sidewall...

It's also a very tidy auto so very unlikely the previous owner modified it in Japan with coilovers etc.

What is the correct size for rims + tyres for 19" on the Coupe?

Do a bit of research on g35driver.com plenty of info there.

Coupes can take a much wider wheel/tire combo front and back not to mention run really low offsets as well. You should take full advantage of this if you have a coupe. My advice:

1. find the wheel that you like

2. see if they are available in 9" front and 10" rear

3. choose an offset between +10 to +15

4. Then use the tire calculator to work out tyre profile and width

If you are looking locally at wheel shops etc, your choices will be significantly limited with regards to offset and width.

Try sourcing 2nd hand Jap wheels, there are quite a few around if you keep your eyes peeled.

Ok, been looking around.

If i decide to go from 225/40/18f to 245/35/19f, then i actually lower the ride height by about 40mm? Is that right?

They are both completely wrong profiles for a V35.

Use the calculator and stick in 245/45/18 as your tyre then compare it with profiles in 19 inch.

To give you an idea I'm running 245/40/19 and 275/35/19. Your overall diameter should be around 675mm on average +/1 15mm is ok

sorry n1sm0, 245/40/19 is the WRONG profile for V35 front.

the closest profile to stock 225/45/18 at the front is 245/35/19

the rear 275/35/19 you have IS the closest profile to stock 245/45/18

245/40/19 = 678mm

275/35/19 = 674mm

245/45/18 = 677mm

Don't argue with me :( I've done my homework, my tire guys agree with me and the guys in the US run this profile on their g35s :)

Our cars are rear wheel drive, best to compare it with the rears.

The guys on the G35 forums are saying the closest to stock is 245/35/19f and 275/35/19r but not on OEM 19" rims, only on rims that are at least 9"....

That's why i was wondering if i went from 225/40/18 (my current incorrect tyre) at the front, and wanted to get a 19" wheel+rim, then apparently the correct is 245/35/19f and 275/35/19r, and my question was - this actually lowers the ride height?

Edited by Eldubb
The guys on the G35 forums are saying the closest to stock is 245/35/19f and 275/35/19r but not on OEM 19" rims, only on rims that are at least 9"....

That's why i was wondering if i went from 225/40/18 (my current incorrect tyre) at the front, and wanted to get a 19" wheel+rim, then apparently the correct is 245/35/19f and 275/35/19r, and my question was - this actually lowers the ride height?

it won't lower ur ride height, it will give u increased ground clearance.

Rianto - the 225/45/18 & 245/45/18 combo is a bit of an exception to the rule, difference in OD is quite a fair bit and the 350zs came with these from factory, so I understand where you are coming from. But remember, our cars (sedan) came out of the factory with all 4 same width wheels and tyre profiles, so it would make sense to keep the OD front and rear as close as possible.

There are guys in the US tht run 245/35/19 & 275/30/19..they are the ones who dump their cars and like running skinny tires which looks good.

it won't lower ur ride height, it will give u increased ground clearance.

Rianto - the 225/45/18 & 245/45/18 combo is a bit of an exception to the rule, difference in OD is quite a fair bit and the 350zs came with these from factory, so I understand where you are coming from. But remember, our cars (sedan) came out of the factory with all 4 same width wheels and tyre profiles, so it would make sense to keep the OD front and rear as close as possible.

There are guys in the US tht run 245/35/19 & 275/30/19..they are the ones who dump their cars and like running skinny tires which looks good.

yep, but that's because the guy who's asking this question wants a 19" for his coupe, that's why I was referring to the staggered coupe sizes...

and very unlikely he's going for a standard OEM 19" from late model V35...

V35 coupe also come with this size from factory, exactly like 350Z, despite both 18" rims has 8" wide front and back... don't ask me why, I think Nissan should have made the front ones 7" or 7.5" as it shown on my OEM rims the 8" wide with skinny 225 tyre at the front caused the previous owner in Japan scratch the rims badly on japanese gutter.

as it shown on my OEM rims the 8" wide with skinny 225 tyre at the front caused the previous owner in Japan scratch the rims badly on japanese gutter.

My 18" have also bad gutter rash from japan because of this. so we all agree if i go 19 x 9, i'll try to get the 245/35 front and 275/35 back?

Edited by Eldubb

Hey Eldubb,

I'm looking at exactly the same issue too. So did you buy the 19" at 245/35f and 275/35r?

Also for the guys that know, the offsets that are supposed to best suit the V35 are in the teens, i.e. +15.

The guys at the tyre shop were offering me +30's offset, what is the difference? How will it affect the ride?

In terms of rim, they have Work wheels, which are beautiful, but a little pricey of course.

They also have Taiwanese made wheels, which look great, but a lot heavier and cheaper, what do you guys think?

Standard offset on V35 coupe is +30 front and back...

My aftermarket is +30 front and +25 rear. There is no need to go to +15... the more the difference in offset that can cause more strain to the hub, causing premature wear on hub bearings....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 馃槓
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
  • Create New...