Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Already posted in the stickied O2 sensor section however this is rather urgent, hoping on a main page it will get a bit more exposure.

curious

i stuck the cable in the com port of the stagea last night

unfortunately i have not been able to stick the cable in within 60 starts of the lst check engine light so i cant be too sure of the problem.

i'm thinking my o2 sensor is stuffed

the o2 sensor was reading 0.2 to 0.3 V (volts?) on a warm engine after start up

after continuous loops around 2 roundabouts boosting it hard for about 5 mins i returned home

the guage was stationalry, reading 0.02 V

is this a sign that my 02 sensor is shagged?

i'm not sure on what one should read and i dont want to go through the hard slog of country f**k wits to try and get one if its ok.

any ideas of theories?

img-resized.png Reduced: 93% of original size [ 1024 x 640 ] - Click to view full imageecutalk.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/277229-ecu-talk-o2-sensor-help/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

not sure whats up with ur screenshot, all the sensors there show 0

anyway, 0.3v o2 sensor generally means its dead (assuming its warm). when u rev the engine a bit at idle u should see it move around when engine is warm, if it doesnt react then its dead

best way to tell is log a run and then graph the sensor afterwards (or just look at the readings), it should be moving quite a bit from 0.1v up to 0.9v and back and forth when cruising/light load, and generally moving about to 0.9v on power etc.

hiya. I'm pretty sure it should ideally sit at 0.5v which is lambda (14.7:1 ideal afr) and it should periodically flick from 0 to 1. I know its never this exact but 0.2 sounds like its running a spot rich overall (never a bad thing I think personally - much better than the other way around lol!). The fact it doesn't move suggests the o2 sensor may have seen better days and they're not that much to replace so usually worth doing I think if you haven't.

edit sorry its the other way around - 1v is rich, 0v lean - sorry about that!

Edited by anthonymcgrath

the o2 sensor is a narrowband sensor, which basically means its either reporting 'richer than 14.7:1' or 'leaner than 14.7:1', it doesnt really ever sit on 0.5v but is continually going back and forth as ecu continually fine tunes the fuel around the 14.7:1 point.

so when cruising along, the correct behaviour would not be constant at 0.5v, but rather back and forth from close to 0v and to 1v (even if its reading 0.1v, this may not a whole lot leaner than 14.7:1, and likewise even 0.9v isnt too much richer than 14.7:1)

no the screen shot was after i moved the laptop inside to connect to the net and disconnected from ecu.

i wasn't sure of the scale of the o2 sensor being V (volts i assimed) i wasn't aware it had volts or was supposed to read resistance (ohms), so stuck it up to hopefully trigger someone to look at it.

at the moment on cruise it is sitting at 0.01v to nothing

i'm assuming its dead - casual drivin gets 350km to a 60L tank and would like to see a slight improvement

i just wanted a bit more understanding before i purchase something i may not need

Edited by 910trx

yep if it sits on any single value (but often close to 0v or 0.3v) when car is cruising then its dead. most people dont change them often enough (theyre supposed to be changed like every 40-80'000km i think, but most people are lucky to change them once in the cars lifetime).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pfft. As if I'd ever point a high pressure washer at my car.
    • The nature of my commute has changed. Way back then it was traffic lights all the way, for ~28km. It sucked. When they finally stitched the expressway together I could do a good 15+km of it at a steady 80-100 with no stopping. That alone has gotten me down to flat 10s. Prior to that it was mid-high 10s. I can't remember the delta that I saw when I got the idle down. It was only ~150 rpm, because the idle speed was never terrible, but for the delta in consumption to be noticeable it would have had to have been at least 0.2-0.3 L/100km - which is not to be sneezed at when it comes for absolute free. It's only about 50L per year, but that's ~$100. A few extra pizzas is always welcome. Note that I have a record of every tank of fuel that has ever gone through my car except for a handful put in by someone else, like my mechanic. I can show you the difference between stock RB20 and tuned RB20, stock RB5Neo and tuned, winter and summer fuel blends, winter and summer fuel blends when the ambient temperature is not appropriate for the blend, working O2 sensor, blown O2 sensor, boosting f**k out of it and frightened to boost it because it is pinging, and so on. OK, I probably can't do all that now with 100% clarity - but at the time when any of those things were in event, you could see it in the records. There's 25+ years of simple tank after tank records, so you have to look for landmarks to work out approximately how old any single record is. What's really important is the meta data and that lives in my head.
    • If you're claiming the issues are not skyline specific, then either the USA is living in the 90s / early 2000s, OR you have the issue of "survivor bias". Which is you're mainly hearing and listening to those with terrible experiences, and haven't found the guys who have cars with good decent builds and no problems. It happens in AU too, that plenty of people keep having issues, and they keep going to the workshops that are known to be shit "because I read on the internet". Even worse, are those who keep posting on the internet as though they know for a fact what something is, when they've never touched/looked at said item in their life, and again are making assumptions, based on something they read, or because it's a certain way in other cars. It's even funnier when those same people debate the facts with the people who've lived and breathed this stuff for over 15 years. Example, I've had someone tell me you can't do something with a Skyline, because they read it on the internet, except I can tell they're wrong, as I did that exact thing back in 2008 with my Skyline.
    • The funniest part I saw, was someone would bitch and moan on FB about something, Andy would be the one to respond, asking for more info, if he could contact them, what the engine setup is, what their config file was, and 95% of the responses were people just going "der! It doesn't work" and Andy going "What doesn't work?" And then going "The firmware!" And they'd go around in circles as no one could ever give information, and Haltech couldn't fault things on the bench, (especially when people wouldn't give any specifics).   Many moons ago, when Andy was back at e420c stage, he reached out to me, and asked me to test different plug and play looms for him (already had an e420c in the car on his V1 PNP loom). And he kept asking me, as I was competent enough to be able to give him some specific feedback on what was/wasn't working, how to replicate the faults etc, and work through things with him. Most people are terrible at answering the questions they're asked, or being able to provide quality feedback other than "it doesn't work".
    • I say it often, none of this stuff is really Skyline-specific per se. But in general there's not a lot of people who actually know what they're doing. A lot of people charging like they do. Agile software development probably isn't the greatest idea for an engine controller.
×
×
  • Create New...