Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all , a while back I read an article from Autospeed (JE) that made me stop and think .

Google EBDI or ethanol boosted direct injection and there's a bit to read , this PDF one looks interesting .

http://www.ethanolboost.com/LFEE-2005-01.pdf

Just as a taste I believe some of the manufacturers are trying to find ways to close the gap on fuel consumption between Unleaded Petrol and Ethanol blends of which E85 is one .

The thing that was always going to be the stumbling block for ethanol blended fuel was the greater usage and how to make that cost neutral or even cheaper .

Well it seems that ways are being found by upping the static CR's and I'd say playing with dynamic (effective CR's) with sophisticated variable valve lift/duration valve trains .

I haven't had time to read much yet but I get the feeling that direct injection and evaporative cooling properties of Ethanol are helping with detonation supression and I'd imagine NOx emissions .

I think what the manufacturers are trying to achieve is more power from smaller than usual capacity engines run in a higher state of tune . The smaller capacity engines have the ability to get better consumption but they have to be able to make acceptable torque to haul the typical SUV barge around .

I think there's a shift towards lowering C02 output as well so the manufacturers are obviously concerned about political correctness , Kermit customers and the real danger of this #@^&*ng carbon credit scheme business .

All I care about is interest in ethanol fuels and the available blends ratio increasing .

I think the secret with fuel consumption is higher CR's but detonation and NOx have to be delt with .

Thoughts , cheers A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Ah yes but were you responsible? In the time I've had it (just before Christmas) I spun off the track twice and drove into things twice, so four separate incidents.. in two outings. Luckily I have a full OEM GTR front end to put on which is hopefully not a precursor for further, future, more expensive mistakes to come. It is some consolation that anyone who would want to buy my Altia bar would have to paint it anyway, the guards, too. (if they can get over the asymmetry). Hopefully over the weekend I will disassemble and see how badly things are bent. From what it looks like, the headlight has actually just been pushed back and bent the headlight support (which .. somehow... crushed the guard in). I guess the headlight plastic is strong stuff.
    • These things happen And I believe "we, the people, who modify stuff, and actually use it, cannot have nice things" It's just a shame that it happened so soon after paint  I still win the award for quickly destroying newly painted panels I think, as my car came back from the paint shop all nice and shiny, until about 4 hours later when the boot was destroyed by a wayward locker that was blown around by the wind.... What doesn't kill you makes you stronger, and poorer.....dooh
    • This. And also, the rotor thickness is constrained by the calipers. Cannot be much thicker, if at all. Cannot be much thinner, if at all. New rotors are....fairly cheap. Turbo calipers can still be picked up for sensible money. Arguably, the best thing is to get R32 calipers and put them on mount spacers on 324mm discs. That's about the cheapest and easiest way to get quite large brakes that are essentially bolt on. And that's despite maintaining for years that the R32 calipers are not the best choice because they seem to be more flexy and creaky than the others. If you were prepared to put up with nasty little NA sliding calipers, these will still seem like Brembos by comparison.
    • A quick Google said 297mm..
    • Why would you not fit the biggest possible brakes?
×
×
  • Create New...