Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Mark,

The biggest question in regard to you getting money back for your car, that as far as i can see no one has asked, did the other guy have insurance? If he doesnt have insurance then you could be massively out of luck. I knew of someone in a simialr situation where the other guy that caused the accident didnt have insurance either and it ended up going to court with an outcome that the guy that caused the accident had to repay $10 a week because he didnt have the money, so although you may eventually get your money its of no real help because of the time span.

Fingers are crossed for you that he does have comprehensive insurance.

Not to lecture you as there has already been plenty of that, but this does highlight the need for even 3rd party insurance, because atleast that way you have some one on your side. And i know the financial issues that can effect having insurance, i pay something ridiculous like 4k each year with the cars i have, but i like to know that they are protected, and one of them i only drive 2 or 3 times a year if its lucky, but if the shed its stored in burns down its not covered as contents and i would be throwing 70k down the drain so im forced to have it insured. And as someone mentioned previously, without insurance if the car got stolen you wouldnt have a leg to stand on and all you could do is hope its recovered in reasonable condition, which is unfortunately unlikely with a GTR.

Anyway, good luck with it all, i hope it works out in your favour somehow.

Ben

Hi Mark,

The biggest question in regard to you getting money back for your car, that as far as i can see no one has asked, did the other guy have insurance? If he doesnt have insurance then you could be massively out of luck. I knew of someone in a simialr situation where the other guy that caused the accident didnt have insurance either and it ended up going to court with an outcome that the guy that caused the accident had to repay $10 a week because he didnt have the money, so although you may eventually get your money its of no real help because of the time span.

Fingers are crossed for you that he does have comprehensive insurance.

Not to lecture you as there has already been plenty of that, but this does highlight the need for even 3rd party insurance, because atleast that way you have some one on your side. And i know the financial issues that can effect having insurance, i pay something ridiculous like 4k each year with the cars i have, but i like to know that they are protected, and one of them i only drive 2 or 3 times a year if its lucky, but if the shed its stored in burns down its not covered as contents and i would be throwing 70k down the drain so im forced to have it insured. And as someone mentioned previously, without insurance if the car got stolen you wouldnt have a leg to stand on and all you could do is hope its recovered in reasonable condition, which is unfortunately unlikely with a GTR.

Anyway, good luck with it all, i hope it works out in your favour somehow.

Ben

That's right, something similar happened to my dad years ago. He went through the lights, someone ran a red, went into the side of him and wrote off the car. They didn't have insurance, had to go to court, they then had to pay $20 or so a fortnight for like 5 years (cant remember exactly) - then my parents had to mess around with them either not paying, then booking more court time to get them to pay, etc etc. I definitely suggest insurance....speaking of which i still need to organize :S.

Hi Mark,

I hope this thread has been of help.

I should have mentioned that you should keep a copy of all the paperwork you fill out and of all correspondence and reports.

You are entitled to get a copy of the police accident report too.

I would also ask for a copy of your GPs notes too (assuming you had to see a GP to get a certificate for the week off of work).

And it would be to your advantage if you could file everything so that you can find it later. I am still dealing with insurance companies for accidents that occurred in 2002, 2003, 2007 & 2008. It is a long process and insurance companies will delay paying you for as long as possible. You may be asked to produce documents that are generated at the time of the accident. For me that is nearly 7 years ago and counting!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • But we haven't even gotten to the point of talking about stateless controllers or any of the good stuff yet!
    • You guys need to take this discussion to another thread if you want to continue it, most of the last 2 pages has nothing to do with OP's questions and situation
    • And this, is just ONE major issue for closed loop control, particularly using PID. One such issue that is created right here, is integrator wind up. But you know GTSBoy, "it's just a simple PID controller"...  
    • Nah. For something like boost control I wouldn't start my design with PID. I'd go with something that originates in the fuzzy logic world and use an emergency function or similar concept. PID can and does work, but at its fundamental level it is not suited to quick action. I'd be reasonably sure that the Profecs et al all transitioned to a fuzzy algorithm back in the 90s. Keep in mind also that where and when I have previously talked about using a Profec, I'm usually talking about only doing an open loop system anyway. All this talk of PID and other algorithms only comes into play when you're talking closed loop boost control, and in the context of what the OP needs and wants, we're probably actually in the realm of open loop anyway. Closed loop boost control has always bothered me, because if you sense the process value (ie the boost measurement that you want to control) in the plenum (after the throttle), then boost control to achieve a target is only desirable at WOT. When you are not WOT, you do not want the the boost to be as high as it can be (ie 100% of target). That's why you do not have the throttle at WO. You're attempting to not go as fast as you can. If the process variable is measured upstream of the throttle (ie in an RB26 plenum, or the cold side pipework in others) then yeah, sure, run the boost controller closed loop to hit a target boost there, and then the throttle does what it is supposed to do. Just for utter clarity.... an old Profec B Spec II (or whatever it is called, and I've got one, and I never look at it, so I can't remember!) and similar might have a MAP sensor, and it might show you the actual boost in the plenum (when the MAP sensor is connected to the plenum) but it does not use that value to decide what it is doing to control the boost, except to control the gating effect (where it stops holding the gate closed on the boost ramp). It's not closed loop at all. Once the gate is released, it's just the solenoid flailing away at whatever duty cycle was configured when it was set up. I'm sure that there are many people who do not understand the above points and wonder wtf is going on.  
    • This has clearly gone off on quite a tangent but the suggestion was "go standalone because you probably aren't going to stop at just exhaust + a mild tune and manual boost controller", not "buy a standalone purely for a boost controller". If the scope does in fact stop creeping at an EBC then sure, buy an EVC7 or Profec or whatever else people like to run and stop there. And I have yet to see any kind of aftermarket boost control that is more complicated than a PID controller with some accounting for edge cases. Control system theory is an incredibly vast field yet somehow we always end up back at some variant of a PID controller, maybe with some work done to linearize things. I have done quite a lot, but I don't care to indulge in those pissing matches, hence posting primary sources. I deal with people quite frequently that scream and shout about how their opinion matters more because they've shipped more x or y, it doesn't change the reality of the data they're trying to disagree with. Arguing that the source material is wrong is an entirely separate point and while my experience obviously doesn't matter here I've rarely seen factory service manuals be incorrect about something. It's not some random poorly documented internal software tool that is constantly being patched to barely work. It's also not that hard to just read the Japanese and double check translations either. Especially in automotive parts most of it is loanwords anyways.
×
×
  • Create New...