Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 477
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Marko how is the Nitto oil pump going for you? What sort of oil pressures do you see hot?

- on cold start up it is over 6bar

- warm idle it is 4bar

- normal driving it is just over 6bar

- when i push gets close to 8bar

HEAPS of pressure on hand :P great for the main & big end bearings!

i am 'thinking' of upgrading the rear housings on my -10's (i probably wont be arsed yet its good to know anyway)...anyone have experience in running .86's in a twin (or single) configuration as i would liek to determine the power gain & fitment challenges as below:

- the requirement for customised dumps

- i was advised that .86 rear housing is more suited for single applications & that it might become too laggy (i dont want lag but maybe i can get away with it on a 3ltr)

- i wasnt sure if there would be adequate room & clearance to run the larger turbos in a low mount position?

here is the website, shows .86 option but no technical specs:

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...R_707160_10.htm

i am 'thinking' of upgrading the rear housings on my -10's (i probably wont be arsed yet its good to know anyway)...anyone have experience in running .86's in a twin (or single) configuration as i would liek to determine the power gain & fitment challenges as below:

- the requirement for customised dumps

- i was advised that .86 rear housing is more suited for single applications & that it might become too laggy (i dont want lag but maybe i can get away with it on a 3ltr)

- i wasnt sure if there would be adequate room & clearance to run the larger turbos in a low mount position?

here is the website, shows .86 option but no technical specs:

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...R_707160_10.htm

You dont think they would be a little big for the street? Run E85 then if you still want more (you nutbag) then go the bigger housings?

i am 'thinking' of upgrading the rear housings on my -10's (i probably wont be arsed yet its good to know anyway)...anyone have experience in running .86's in a twin (or single) configuration as i would liek to determine the power gain & fitment challenges as below:

- the requirement for customised dumps

- i was advised that .86 rear housing is more suited for single applications & that it might become too laggy (i dont want lag but maybe i can get away with it on a 3ltr)

- i wasnt sure if there would be adequate room & clearance to run the larger turbos in a low mount position?

here is the website, shows .86 option but no technical specs:

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...R_707160_10.htm

You dont think they would be a little big for the street? Run E85 then if you still want more (you nutbag) then go the bigger housings?

You dont think they would be a little big for the street? Run E85 then if you still want more (you nutbag) then go the bigger housings?

E85 isn't a bad idea but the inconvenience will definitely do my head in.

With the larger housings I do question the possible lag and clearance issues, anyone know what they are rated at with .82s?

i fitted the new plugs & splitfires - runs like a dream & seems to hit harder all around :down:

i know its probably better for the coil packs to run without the valley cover as they probably get more air ventilation, is this more apparent on the track though as mine is a street car (and the valley cover adds bling to the engine bay :P)

yep you should run the largest gap you can without missfiring, bigger spark = better burn = more power. 1.1 is ideal but many people gap them down as low as .8 under larger boost

Hi guys,

When i 1st ran my car over the weekend with my new coil packs & new plugs bcpr7es (gap 0.8mm) it was fine at the time but i only drove it for 10min. I started the car again last night & right from the onset on idle it was carrying on, coughing, very rough & could barely reverse it on flat ground so i let it run for about 10min & the idle slowly became cleaner but as soon i revved it the engine was extremely rough.

I checked the plugs & they were black like powder charcoal – very rich!

I then put my pfr7a’s (1.1mm gap) back in & the problem was fixed, drove it for an hour with no issues 

I am trying to sum up a conclusion as to the cause...both plugs run the same temp sooo it must be the gap right?

As u suggest Duncan, the larger the gap the stronger the spark & better fuel burn? It was tuned with pfr7a’s @ 1.1mm gap.

I am guessing that if i regapged my bcpr7es @ 1.1mm they would be fine.

  • 2 weeks later...

hi guys,

i had my gtr on the dyno for a quick health check & i asked about my exhaust (steve N1GTR prompted me on this, damn you mate im gona go broke hehe). im currently running a hks superdrager which is 3.25inch at the front, then steps to 3.5inch mid way & finished with 3.75inch at the diff.

my tuner told me if i wanted more power to increase size & run x-force front pipes (2 x 3inch pipes which collect into a 3.5inch) then with a new 4inch all the way thru to the rear.

he told me i should expect 20awkw gain or more as the larger capacity rb26/30 really doesn't like back pressure :ermm:

1 of his customers cars made more than 20awkw. where does it end haha

Thats exactly what Racepace told me when I asked them about building me a mines style front pipe with a 450awkw goal with my new engine. Bummer was that they couldnt make the pipe for me without me sending the car down to them though, seeing as all systems are custom made to fit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • All of that is absolutely true. At any time in the history of these turbos the lottery has always been that it could die at stock boost treated exactly as the factory intended, or it could die when pushed to 10, or 12, or 14, or 16 psi, after a short time, or a longer time, or it could last seemingly forever. You have the combination of all the possible statistical (probably) normal distributions of manufacturing tolerances and quality outcomes, on top of the statistical distributions of failure modes (which might be normal, but are probably biased, like Poisson distributions). You get the lucky turbo and you can beat on it for years. You get the really unlucky turbo and it will crap itself as it rolls out of the factory gate. And every possibility in between. But you can definitely still kill the lucky turbo. It's just that most people didn't try, once they knew they really shouldn't try.
    • Maybe I have Stockholm syndrome but working on an M2 isn't that hard. Getting parts cheaply and quickly is hard, but getting parts same day isn't necessarily hard if you're willing to pay way too much for it at local dealers. There's a lot going on, you need to have a build of ISTA on a laptop and the right cable, if you don't have the mindset of "do it exactly right or not at all" you will probably start seeing cascading failures. Skylines are a little more tolerant in that regard. The car doesn't potentially trash itself if you bought the wrong oil filter like a BMW would. Or trash the entire cylinder head and potentially spin a bearing because someone took the anti-drainback valve out of the plastic oil filter cap. An M2 will also do just fine on track, zero oil starvation concerns, factory brakes are great if you change the pads for a high temp compound + flush with track-ready fluid.
    • The "ideal/formula" that used to be touted was death of the turbo is going to be caused by a combination of 3 things. Heat Speed of turbo (boost level you're pushing) Time   Basically, you can get away with high heat and high boost for short periods. But start doing long hard pulls, or circuit driving etc, and now you've increased time as well which will shred things. From memory when Adrian was drag racing he was running 17psi, on a stock turbo, and running insane speeds. But he also had other additives helping in the setup too. Some people have success at 14psi for a while, while others due to pushing the cars hard for long periods opt down to lower temps. But also, generate a lot of heat (let's say bad tune), for a long time, and you'll be okay, until you try to spin that little guy up slightly. It's the one advantage of dumping a lot of fuel in, you'll be reducing EGT a bit and helping with the heat portion of the above 3 areas.   And these days, stock turbos are that old that there's the possibility of just outright failures due to material age. I'm not shocked that even when used in factory spec that a stock turbo fails when 30 years old. It's a worn out "precision" "balanced" performance item, that's likely no longer precise, or well balanced
    • this... hence I said what I said previously, SMSP nights you see mainly Hondas, Evos, A90s, F80x and the odd VW. The 5 or 6 times I went, I only saw 1x R32 GT-R, and other than that I was the only one in a shit box Skyline.
    • Yeah, but it's not "boost" that they can take more of. Well, I guess it actually is. They are the same turbine, driving different compressors. I think the failure is more of a turbine temperature and (probably mostly) speed thing. I think the RB25s end up needing the turbine to reach higher speeds in order to drive the compressor to achieve the same boost level. So they will fail at lower boost on a 25 because they've actually reached the same failure speed that they do on a 20 at a higher boost pressure. If that makes sense?
×
×
  • Create New...