Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 477
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Congrat on the set up Marko.

It must be one nice fun beast to drive in.

Yes I think your tuner is right :bunny:

You will need the Indy blue 1600cc if you want to change over to E85.

I am going through the process for my 3.0L and T618Z turbo at the moment.

I had around 90% duty cycle with 700cc injectors at 24psi with a power fc D jetro.

With the E85 and 1000cc injectors, the duty cycle was 100% at 23-24psi!

This was with a faulty vipec adaptor board though. One of the transistor on the board kept the EFI relay on and I have injector buzz even when the power was switched off. The injectors were loosely installed on the fuel rail as well, so I don't know how much E85 juice was wasted with these faults.

Dirt is right, the 3.0L sucks a lot of juice :rolleyes:

I should have the car retune in the next 2 weeks with the 1600cc injectors. I can keep you inform if you like.

Dirt is right, the 3.0L sucks a lot of juice :bunny:

I should have the car retune in the next 2 weeks with the 1600cc injectors. I can keep you inform if you like.

yes well ive noticed it drinks a substantial amount of fuel, its not built for economy so i dont care

i'd be most interested to see your results - please keep me informed.

what hp is the t618z rated at?

i went for a drive last night, its actually much harder to push the car on the road as the power band is much wider than my other setup (i.e. starts spooling @ 3000rpm, rb26 started @ 5500rpm) so i find that im changing gears much sooner than my rev limit (i.e. 7000rpm). i need to get used to it.

i gave it a good squirt in 2nd gear & it broke out into a wild wheel spin :rolleyes:

for the 1st time ive rated my car as dangerous as my previous bike (suzuki gsxr1000 worked with 173.5rwhp)...now im waiting for a litre bike to pick on me :bunny:

I had around 90% duty cycle with 700cc injectors at 24psi with a power fc D jetro.

With the E85 and 1000cc injectors, the duty cycle was 100% at 23-24psi!

That's 58.7% more E85 (700 x 90% versus 1000 x 100%). Something is drastically wrong, there is no way any car I have ever seen with E85 uses 58.7% more fuel. I have seen 25% and the occasional 30% when more power(boost) and/or rpm is tuned for. But 58.7% in the same engine at the same boost and rpm is unbelieveable.

This was with a faulty vipec adaptor board though. One of the transistor on the board kept the EFI relay on and I have injector buzz even when the power was switched off. The injectors were loosely installed on the fuel rail as well, so I don't know how much E85 juice was wasted with these faults.

Based on the above I'd say about 30%.

Dirt is right, the 3.0L sucks a lot of juice :P

It depends on the comparison, my last 3 litre used less fuel for the same horsepower than the RB26 that it replaced. Mostly because I used a lot lower rpm, keeping in mind torque x rpm / 5250 = horsepower.

I should have the car retune in the next 2 weeks with the 1600cc injectors. I can keep you inform if you like.

Thanks that will be most helpfull

Cheers

Gary

i went for a drive last night, its actually much harder to push the car on the road as the power band is much wider than my other setup (i.e. starts spooling @ 3000rpm, rb26 started @ 5500rpm) so i find that im changing gears much sooner than my rev limit (i.e. 7000rpm). i need to get used to it.

i gave it a good squirt in 2nd gear & it broke out into a wild wheel spin :(

for the 1st time ive rated my car as dangerous as my previous bike (suzuki gsxr1000 worked with 173.5rwhp)...now im waiting for a litre bike to pick on me :D

A big torque GTR is nuts on the street...id roll on the throttle and it would break traction at 6000rpm...that was with a little more than 1/2 throttle. I was unusually quiet after my first real drive around my test track here in Newcastle. Ill admit it did scare me...very used to it now though and want more. :(

hey gary - the scale along the bottom is kph (0-200)

post-a235105-dyno.JPG

Have I got it right, max torque is around 4,250 rpm and max horsepower is around 6,100 rpm and it makes less than 50 rwkw at 3,000 rpm? Or is my maths totally screwed up?

Cheers

Gary

A big torque GTR is nuts on the street...id roll on the throttle and it would break traction at 6000rpm...that was with a little more than 1/2 throttle. I was unusually quiet after my first real drive around my test track here in Newcastle. Ill admit it did scare me...very used to it now though and want more. :cool:

chasing hp is a never ending story...i did the hill climb on the old rd coming back after the brooklyn bridge and my mate was following me, i applied the throttle in 3rd gear overtaking a fireblade exiting a corner and he told me i left 4 black lines, felt like a tiger hanging on with its paws

Have I got it right, max torque is around 4,250 rpm and max horsepower is around 6,100 rpm and it makes less than 50 rwkw at 3,000 rpm? Or is my maths totally screwed up?

Cheers

Gary

your calculations are not right, would be if it was a rgv250

Edited by Marko R1

Yes it would be nice to have rpm/speed on the X-axis.

Isnt' the rpm limit at 8500rpm on that dyno print out?

Marko, Trust doesn't really advertise any power for the T517z or T618z.

It's not nice for the price that they charge for these turbo.

However I always had good results with Trust turbo so I stayed with them.

The only results I've seen around for T618z are from Uras and this chart

post-a221725-powerfact1.JPG

Sydneykid, thanks for the calculation. I was thinking the same too. I've made a lot of changes since the tune mentioned, but I will retune the car at the same boost and rpm for comparision. I will keep you guys informed.

it's an awesome result mate, just one thing and this bugs me all the time. and that's people confusing the dynos measurement of tractive effort (expressed in N) as torque expressed in Nm. that is not 930 newton metres of torque and sadly you can't really compare it to manufacturers who quote for example 320kw and 600nm of torque. it's 9000N. it's a measurement of tractive effort, yes, but it's not the same and not directly comparable or easily converted to NM. it's one thing that always pisses me off that dyno's read 'torque' in this way.

it does look to me it's making about 75kw at 3,000 and 150kw at 4,000 but by 5,000 it's making 225rwkw and is well on it's way! 6000 is making 330rkw, 7000 = 375kw and then it's making 400+ from 8,000 onwards. it would be pretty hairy from about 5,500 when the torque is ramping up hard and hitting it's peak at 6,000 or so.

it's a lot of power in a road car and will keep you entertained for a while I reckon. Greg builds great engines and I've recommended him to a number of people over the years all of whom were very happy.

Is anyone else wondering what that curve would look like with equal lift but lower duration cam profiles?

what about smaller cams, turbo's ,capacity, same dyno, same tuner, same fuel and relatively standard home built engine using only pistons, rod bolts and cams from the aftermarket catalogue?

Edited by DiRTgarage
what about smaller cams, turbo's ,capacity, same dyno, same tuner, same fuel and relatively standard home built engine using only pistons and cams from the aftermarket catalogue?

No not your motor's dyno graph Paul, just cam duration change to Marko's one :cool:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No worries at all 🫡 I think the most satisfying things to make are the little bits that are just impossible to find or they're no longer manufactured. Generally I always try to replace parts with OEM wherever possible. This little project is also great because it'll never see the light of day, but strengthen these brackets so it's not just relying on the little standard screws in the headlight plastic. As soon as I saw the standard brackets and screws I thought, "well I'm not going to install with just the screws, the plastic tabs will just snap off". It's crazy how expensive everything has become yeah. But I suppose that's supply and demand; granted it's a lot easier to get brand new genuine parts these days which is fantastic 😊, I don't have to get totally reamed at the local Nissan dealer ha ha We sure are lucky we have all these manufacturers making parts these days, a few really great Australian companies too like Platinum Racing Products and Fit Mint Automotive, what a time to be alive ❤️ . I've got my eye on the RB26 head by PRP as mine has a very fine hairline crack, so that'll need to be addressed some time in the future. If you have any requests or odd things to make feel free to let me know and I can have a crack at making replacement parts ✌️
    • Thanks for sharing this, and BTW if your headlights are in good condition they are worth thousands....you might want to consider replacing them with brand new LED ones like this (https://www.nengun.com/78works/full-led-headlights-r32-skyline) and making enough profit to buy a house in Sydney
    • I'm not sure what sort of shops are nearby, but I'd expect any reasonable exhaust shop could put a cat in it that will not restrict the power that engine makes. Otherwise, if you want to remove it, short lengths that replace the cat are readily available online, search for "de-cat pipes" or "test pipes"  
    • Howdy friends, So another weird one today, I was looking into replacing some broken clips holding the front grille for the R32 GTR (part number 01553-03831), and noticed the brackets which are supposed to hold the grille in place were also missing 😑. I do recall seeing this issue many years ago, but didn't fix it at the time. A quick look on eBay and I was able to find the genuine brackets, along with all the screws which suited the headlights (part numbers 26042-08U05,26092-08U05). Happy days!....  Once they arrived however there was an extra nut in the packaging which implied that there should also be a bolt or a stud, and sure enough, after a bit of searching I found this thread from 2013, and @Ants clearly shows a stud should be present. Reading around a bit more, it's possible the headlights on my car are the "povo pack" headlights as mentioned by @funkymonkey in this thread way back in 2008. This could explain why the studs are missing on my set of headlights. Looking at the headlight diagram I wasn't able to see a suitable part number for the stud itself. The headlight did indeed have a recess that looked like it would accept a stud, but interestingly no thread or anything obvious how the stud would be affixed to the headlight, I suspect it may have been glued in, press fit, or melted into the plastic at the factory. Another member may be able to clarify if they happen to have a genuine set of N1 headlamps. The only thing we have to work with within the recess is a keyway which likely is there to prevent the stud from rotating within the recess. In any case, back to 3D printing, I put together a model which acts like a pug with a friction fit inside this recess, making use of the keyway so it doesn't rotate while tightening a bolt. Printing in TPU will allow it to slightly swell making a nice snug fit without cracking the part. I've designed the adaptor it to accept an 20 mm M6 bolt (stainless with a cap head in my case), as opposed to the standard M5 stud and I made use of the standard galvanised split washer that came with the genuine brackets from Nissan. Once the bolt and screws were all in place, giving the bracket a gentle shake gave the classic "shaking the car" feeling, very solid, which gives me confidence this is going to be able to hold on much better than the janky solution which seems to have been here for the past decade or so. Overall I'm really pleased with how this turned out and maybe there are more people out there running these headlights without a centre stud at all! Link to the freely available model on Printables: Click here Regards, Sean  
    • Hey everyone, This is my first post apart of the introduction. I tried searching a bit on the forum but couldn't really get a straight answer. I got the car to my mechanic as I felt it being weak. It seems that it was missing on two cylinders due to the injectors. I had all my injectors clean and the car runs much better. The mechanic also confirmed my suspicions that the cat is clogged and needs to be tackled asap. The cat rattles a bit and the hot exhaust warning frequently lights up when driving after getting the injectors clean. In my introduction I was asked about what modification I might be interested in and mentioned a cat delete. From what I was told, this is not really beneficial on the RB20DE and there are more cons than pros.  Could perhaps anyone give some suggestions on what the best course of action would be since the current cat is toast and needs to be removed/replaced anyway? I can also sometimes smell a strong smell of fuel, but I'm not sure if this is related.
×
×
  • Create New...