Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am thinking that I may have to replace my front discs sometime in the near future as theres a fair difference in height/thickness of the disc from where the pad wares on the disc to the small area on the edge of the disc that the pad dosent touch.

Was wondering if its the same setup as the 350z non brembo for pads and discs? and if anyone knows what the min safe thickness is

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/277476-v35-std-brakes-non-brembo/
Share on other sites

Should be.

I have Z33 non-brembo pads in my M35 and they fit perfectly.

Considering that the Brembo package is the same between the Z33 and V35 (also a bolt on for my M35), I would imagine that the non-brembo would be the same and fit all three models.

Edited by iamhe77

same setup

I sold quite a few rotors and pads for early V35 coupe and they're basically early 350Z rotors and pads...

The late model update is a bit tricky at the rear 308mm, V35 coupe 2005~ has rear park brake of around 170mm but a late 350Z has rear park brake around 190mm - so fitting a rear 350Z late model rotors will render the park brake useless.

No issue for early V35 / 350Z either non-brembo or brembo....

I can definitely say that for a series 2 V35 std brakes are NOT the same as 350z.

A couple of years back i had pretty much one of the first series 2's and went to a place to have them changed thinking they were the same but when i got there, quite different.

The V35 pads are much larger than the 350Z non brembo's. Not sure about disc size.

I think the pads should be the same, just the rotor size different?

Rotor Sizes:

V35 early 2001-2004

Front 296mm Rear 292mm (same as 350Z early)

V35 track 2003-2004

Front 324mm Rear 322mm (same as 350Z track)

V35 late 2005-2008

Front 320mm Rear 308mm (Front is same as 350Z late 17" EXCEPT rear rotor inner diameter)

Pads:

V35 early 2001-2004

Front DP2775 or DP21636 Rear DP21666

V35 track 2003-2004

Front DP21644 Rear DP21537

V35 late 2005-2008

Front DP2775 or DP21636 Rear DP21666

DP2775 and DP21636 have very similar shape and interchangeable.

  • 4 years later...

Did anyone end up solving this issue ? I have sane problem right now please help.. im sick of rda denying that their database is incorrect. I have v35 2005 6mt coupe series 2 .... I need correct rear rotor... inmer diameter is provlem right now.

:) I feel your pain.. I have had the same problem with brake suppliers refusing to accept their catalogues are wrong regardless of how much evidence you give them.

Just about all local brake suppliers will tell you that all V35 non brembo brakes are the same.. This is WRONG!

The listings they have are for Series 1 brakes only!

After researching this quite a bit in the past, this is what I came up with -

early non-brembo 350z (pre 05) and Series 1 V35 front and rear brakes are the same (296mm front rotors, 292mm rear rotors, single piston front and single piston rear callipers).

05+ non-brembo 350z and Series2/3 V35 front and rear brakes are the same (320mm front rotors, 308mm rear rotors, twin piston front and single piston rear callipers)

Not too sure about the brembos, but I wouldn't be surprised if they are the same.

Rear pads are the same across all.

Front Pads are different.

As for the handbrake, I researched this a little and couldn't find anything to suggest the 05+ 350z rear rotors have a 190mm handbrake, all the resources I found said it was a 170mm just like the V35. However, I did find the Brembo rears have a 190mm handbrake.

However, some have claimed the have seen non-brembo 350z rear rotors with a 190mm handbrake, so I am not to sure of this.

As for real life experience, I have a 05+ 350Z rear rotor on my S2 V35 and it fits perfect, same size handbrake.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • One other question, is there a chance that changing the idle speed can lead you down a rabbit hole and is the reason the tuner didn't touch it? Reason I ask is because if that's the reason the tuner avoided it then I probably shouldn't be touching it lol.
    • Pfft. As if I'd ever point a high pressure washer at my car.
    • The nature of my commute has changed. Way back then it was traffic lights all the way, for ~28km. It sucked. When they finally stitched the expressway together I could do a good 15+km of it at a steady 80-100 with no stopping. That alone has gotten me down to flat 10s. Prior to that it was mid-high 10s. I can't remember the delta that I saw when I got the idle down. It was only ~150 rpm, because the idle speed was never terrible, but for the delta in consumption to be noticeable it would have had to have been at least 0.2-0.3 L/100km - which is not to be sneezed at when it comes for absolute free. It's only about 50L per year, but that's ~$100. A few extra pizzas is always welcome. Note that I have a record of every tank of fuel that has ever gone through my car except for a handful put in by someone else, like my mechanic. I can show you the difference between stock RB20 and tuned RB20, stock RB5Neo and tuned, winter and summer fuel blends, winter and summer fuel blends when the ambient temperature is not appropriate for the blend, working O2 sensor, blown O2 sensor, boosting f**k out of it and frightened to boost it because it is pinging, and so on. OK, I probably can't do all that now with 100% clarity - but at the time when any of those things were in event, you could see it in the records. There's 25+ years of simple tank after tank records, so you have to look for landmarks to work out approximately how old any single record is. What's really important is the meta data and that lives in my head.
    • If you're claiming the issues are not skyline specific, then either the USA is living in the 90s / early 2000s, OR you have the issue of "survivor bias". Which is you're mainly hearing and listening to those with terrible experiences, and haven't found the guys who have cars with good decent builds and no problems. It happens in AU too, that plenty of people keep having issues, and they keep going to the workshops that are known to be shit "because I read on the internet". Even worse, are those who keep posting on the internet as though they know for a fact what something is, when they've never touched/looked at said item in their life, and again are making assumptions, based on something they read, or because it's a certain way in other cars. It's even funnier when those same people debate the facts with the people who've lived and breathed this stuff for over 15 years. Example, I've had someone tell me you can't do something with a Skyline, because they read it on the internet, except I can tell they're wrong, as I did that exact thing back in 2008 with my Skyline.
    • The funniest part I saw, was someone would bitch and moan on FB about something, Andy would be the one to respond, asking for more info, if he could contact them, what the engine setup is, what their config file was, and 95% of the responses were people just going "der! It doesn't work" and Andy going "What doesn't work?" And then going "The firmware!" And they'd go around in circles as no one could ever give information, and Haltech couldn't fault things on the bench, (especially when people wouldn't give any specifics).   Many moons ago, when Andy was back at e420c stage, he reached out to me, and asked me to test different plug and play looms for him (already had an e420c in the car on his V1 PNP loom). And he kept asking me, as I was competent enough to be able to give him some specific feedback on what was/wasn't working, how to replicate the faults etc, and work through things with him. Most people are terrible at answering the questions they're asked, or being able to provide quality feedback other than "it doesn't work".
×
×
  • Create New...