Jump to content
SAU Community

My Dyno Results (Stockish Car)...


Anquetil
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yepp,

That looks about right. Shame it's in 3rd gear, although I'm not sure if it'd make a difference anyway.

That dip in power is normal for a GTS-t with a bit of boost. The dip get's worse as you wind up the boost :(

The A/F ratio's are also typical for a stock ECU. Running pretty rich up top.

Mine pulled 160 with the same mods but with a stock air box and a FMIC, so yours look pretty good.

Cheers

J

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i got 153rwkw on 9psi with a power dip like that....

but thats with stock dump, 2.5" cat..only mod is a front pipe so there's more restriction in mine...

after teh AFC tune I got 190rwkw, still stock dump/cat

200rwkw with de-cat and dump pipe should be about right :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Shane

- Stock ECU.

- Full 3" exhaust, Hi-flow Cat.

- Apexi Air Filter.

- 8-9 PSI

- Hot humid day, about 30.

Add a FMIC + Bosch 040 Fuel Pump + boost set to 12psi and you have my car... = 180rwkw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by benm

Add a FMIC + Bosch 040 Fuel Pump + boost set to 12psi and you have my car... = 180rwkw

You may need to change the description you wrote about your car (just below your avtar). I'll let you know what mine is running tommorow evening - putting it on the dyno tommorow arvo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good to here its about average.

Dual boost controller is set up for about 10PSI at the moment but needs a bit more adjustment.

I'm attempting the FMIC install tomorrow, should open her up a bit! If all goes well I'll post some pics of the ghetto home job :(

Mark let us know how yours go's with the new Turb's?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 96 Gtst has similar mods, Pod filter, Intercooler (large), HKS EVC boost controller set to 0.75 bar or 10.5psi, 3" exhaust all the way, plus hi flow cat and pulled 190kw at rear wheels. I will post my chart up once I get the pic scanned as my scanner ain't working.

Anyone else pulling similar power figures.

My engine has done only 60,000km. It also made 203kw at 0.90 bar, but they advised me I had a more reliable long term package this way with less boost especially for the turbos sake.

Paul:burnout:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since power is simply a measuring of rate of work, it shouldn't matter to a great extent what gear the car is in. The engine still revs from 0 to redline whether you're in 3rd gear or reverse. There are some slight differences because engines respond differently according to load, but it shouldn't matter too much. As long as you do each dyno run in the same gear each time you will be able to get the tuning right.

The reason why Skylines (and similar Jap cars) usually get dyno'd in 3rd gear is because in 4th they can run into the 180kph speed limiter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How much difference are we talking here though? If a car has say 200rwkw in 3rd gear, what would it have in 4th?

Edit: Hmm, maybe I'm not understanding this power thing then. I know that lower gears give you more torque, but you have less top speed. So in theory the power should work out to around the same in a taller gear, because you have less torque but more top speed. Someone educate me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's pretty good with 146 rwkw.

But just one question to all you guys here that has had their car dyno.

I have been reading some other threads on this forum and it has come to my attention that not all Dyno has the same reading.

Like your car might be 146 rwkw on this dyno but on someone else it might be more or less.

If this is so, how can we really compare our difference in kw output as we all would have dyno our cars on different machine?

See that is what I don't really get, isn't there like a standard for these dyno machine so that even if they are set different, on a special mode it would be relatively the same standard as the next machine. Or is that what the 'Shoot-out mode' is for?

It is just weird and don't really make much sense to me.

As I soon will want to dyno my car but whether how accurate it is, that is my question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by skylineakt

I have been reading some other threads on this forum and it has come to my attention that not all Dyno has the same reading.

Like your car might be 146 rwkw on this dyno but on someone else it might be more or less.

If this is so, how can we really compare our difference in kw output as we all would have dyno our cars on different machine?

We can't :rolleyes: This has been discussed and argued about many many times before here and everywhere else dynos are discussed. The best you can get from them is a rough guide. Most of them seem to be roughly within 10% of each other, so it's pretty obvious that a car with 250rwkw is going to be a lot more powerful than a different car running 150rwkw on a different dyno.

Generally speaking of course, because you can callibrate the dyno to read whatever you like. But if the second car was "tweaked" to read 250rwkw, it would be pretty obvious that it wasn't legit just by going for a ride in the car. Or even looking at some of the mods.

Even a 1/4 mile time can't accurately judge how much power you've got, because there are considerations such as driver skill, suspension setup, tyres, and sometimes just luck (good or bad). But again, it can give you a pretty good idea. ie, a Skyline running 11 seconds definitely is not stock.

Comparing power outputs is just a pissing match anyway, so I'm kind of glad that you can't compare dyno readings directly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Steve

Well imagine if you had 300nm of torque at 150kmh, if you had the same 300nm at 200kph, power would be lower.

I am not sure exactly how much difference it makes, just does make some difference.

I realise that, but say you were in redline at 3rd gear and doing say 100kph. At redline in 4th you would be putting less torque to the ground but the speed would be higher, which would indicate the same amount of work being done (just geared differently).

Down low the power readings will be lower in the taller gear but I would think that the peak power should be roughly the same no matter what gear you are in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well.... yes and perhaps no. It depends on what you mean by "spool". For most of us, the point that we would describe as where the turbo is "spooling" is the point where the wheel speed gets high enough for it to start making some boost. This is coincidentally around about the point where it starts making noise - hence the "spooling" sound. If that is what you mean, then no - the wastegate should still be shut at this point. The boost will still be way below the point where it should start opening. If, on the other hand, you mean "spool" as "reach full boost", then yes. At the point where the boost has reached target, then boost control has already started. The wastegate is already open, and has been for some time. Some short time, definitely, but still, some time. If you have no boost controller - just the wastegate actuator connected to the boost source, then you have a mechanical system working as a pressure balance. There is pressure on one side of the wastegate actuator's diaphragm from the spring, and pressure on the other side coming from the boost measurement location (the "source"). This is not a digital thing. The wastegate does not stay shut until the boost pressure reaches the spring "pressure". The spring will start to compress as soon as you start to apply any pressure onto it. This can be controlled somewhat by adding pre-load into the spring, but you cannot add enough preload to make it into a digital switch behaviour. The wastegate will crack open and start to leak exhaust out (and therefore not though the turbine) well before you reach the target boost pressure. Electronic (and some mechanical/pneumatic) boost controllers will act to prevent the boost source applying pressure to the actuator until just before you reach target boost, thus preventing the wastegate from creeping open. And some boost controllers will apply boost pressure on the spring side to further push it shut. And this can be be necessary because the exhaust pressure in the manifold also pushes on the wastegate valve and tries to open it and you cab get it leaking even without it being connected to the boost source.
    • A stand alone boost controller will not give you the control you need, unlike a modern ECU. Your boost will always naturally target the wastegate's opening pressure first, your controller then will allow you to add more boost as required.
    • I recently discovered that I could not remove the outer bolt on one of my rear UCAs. Looked like it was seized to the crush tube. It wasn't all that long since I had last had that arm out (I dunno exactly, but certainly <2 yrs), so I was a bit surprised. I thought I had stock bushes in the rear knuckles, so I ordered some new PU bushes and resigned myself to having to do some dismantlery....and some butchery. It was clear that the seized bush was going to need to have the bolt cut out of it and then possibly some more brutality after that. Upon getting the 3x arms on each side disconnected from the knuckles (with the exception of the seized one, of course), I discovered that I had in fact put PU bushes into the knuckles when I did the subframe conversion about 12-13 years ago. So, I say "Oh, good, I might not have to swap any of these others out". We set to work butchering the bolt out of the seized arm. Stainless blade in a big-arse Milwaukee recipro made short work of it, and also damaged the arm, which added a welding and grinding and painting step to the whole exercise. During the butchery it became clear that the bolt was not just seized but bent. Head scratching ensued, as it is hard to understand how that bolt could get bent. I did suffer a broken (stock) toe control arm on that side a few months ago, and drove some miles with some significant rear wheel self steer and lack of control, which probably was the cause. But it's still hard to understand how it would bend that bolt, rather than just bend the arm. But here's the start of the real discoveries. The crush tube was rusty as all shit. I mean seriously rusty. A little on the inside, contributing to the tube seizing to the bolt (along with the bend). But the outside had at least 2-3mm of compressed flaky iron oxide jammed in between the parent metal and the PU bush. This one was brutalised and still took some effort to get the PU off the crush tube. So I thought I'd inspect the others more closely. The one on the tension rod adjacent the bent one was first. I had to use a 2-jaw puller to get the crush tube out, and it took some effort. It came out looking like the first one. All 6 of them were the same, except for one that looked not too bad. Had some corrosion on it, but was mostly OK. There was also a significant amount of corrosion on the inner surfaces of the knuckles. They took some convincing with pointy tools to let go their grip on the inside of the holes they were in. There was no sign of the original (SuperPro) lube anywhere. I and my bro-in-law have never seen any crush tube end up looking like this. It was seriously like the car has spent time putting boats into the water at the boat ramp. So, it seems like the PU might have been bonded to the steel on both sides, which would have to make them work more like stock rubber bushes (where arm deflection results in twist inside the rubber). Despite this, I have never had cause to believe that they were so tightly bound up. The suspension moved up and down much as you'd expect. The car never made any noises in those bushes that would have led me to believe there was a problem. Maybe the rusty interfaces actually were "sliding". Anyway, lesson learnt. Even quiet, non-troublesome PU bushes should be inspected every now and then!
    • the boost controller allows you to adjust the opening of the wastegate (which only has one preset spring) I'm going to see how it acts on it
    • I studied the principle of wastegate to begin with. so if I understood correctly. the moment when the turbo "spool" is where the boost control begins. When the target level of "psi" is reached the wastegate opens to regulate the exhaust pressure passing through the turbo and thus control its speed and the rate of boost
×
×
  • Create New...